From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Subject: Re: [PATCH] virtio_pmem: fix sparse warning Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2019 13:45:36 -0400 Message-ID: <20190711134403-mutt-send-email-mst__7945.99978705577$1562867738$gmane$org@kernel.org> References: <20190710142700.10215-1-pagupta@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190710142700.10215-1-pagupta@redhat.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Errors-To: virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org To: Pankaj Gupta Cc: linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org, cohuck@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, yuval.shaia@oracle.com, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, dan.j.williams@intel.com, lcapitulino@redhat.com List-Id: virtualization@lists.linuxfoundation.org On Wed, Jul 10, 2019 at 07:57:00PM +0530, Pankaj Gupta wrote: > This patch fixes below sparse warning related to __virtio > type in virtio pmem driver. This is reported by Intel test > bot on linux-next tree. > > nd_virtio.c:56:28: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different base types) > nd_virtio.c:56:28: expected unsigned int [unsigned] [usertype] type > nd_virtio.c:56:28: got restricted __virtio32 > nd_virtio.c:93:59: warning: incorrect type in argument 2 (different base types) > nd_virtio.c:93:59: expected restricted __virtio32 [usertype] val > nd_virtio.c:93:59: got unsigned int [unsigned] [usertype] ret > > Signed-off-by: Pankaj Gupta > Reported-by: kbuild test robot > --- > > This fixes a warning, so submitting it as a separate > patch on top of virtio pmem series. > > include/uapi/linux/virtio_pmem.h | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/virtio_pmem.h b/include/uapi/linux/virtio_pmem.h > index efcd72f2d20d..f89129bf1f84 100644 > --- a/include/uapi/linux/virtio_pmem.h > +++ b/include/uapi/linux/virtio_pmem.h > @@ -23,12 +23,12 @@ struct virtio_pmem_config { > > struct virtio_pmem_resp { > /* Host return status corresponding to flush request */ > - __u32 ret; > + __virtio32 ret; > }; > > struct virtio_pmem_req { > /* command type */ > - __u32 type; > + __virtio32 type; > }; > > #endif req/resp are in memory right? Then this looks like a wrong fix. The accessors should all use cpu_to/from_le and they types should be __le32. > -- > 2.20.1