From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Andreas Dannenberg <dannenberg@ti.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2019 13:50:13 -0500
Subject: [U-Boot] [RFC] bug.h: Drop filename from BUG/WARNING logs if
 building for TPL/SPL
In-Reply-To: <20190711184317.GG6891@bill-the-cat>
References: <20190710213044.19985-1-dannenberg@ti.com>
 <20190711153326.wkz3atrfqxlnhbr2@jiji>
 <CAK7LNAREU1ObiCzNNwHqp9v=-RTdt9VHimnnfCkSrtN9PiVf4A@mail.gmail.com>
 <20190711181216.vznixfd5xzk2ihfe@jiji>
 <20190711184317.GG6891@bill-the-cat>
Message-ID: <20190711185013.qrynmdt3iejkbzhh@jiji>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

Hi Tom,

On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 02:43:17PM -0400, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 01:12:16PM -0500, Andreas Dannenberg wrote:

<snip>

> > Also some additional background why I am even looking into this. One of
> > our platforms (AM335x) has a regression building on Travis CI with some
> > of our pending patches applied. Interestingly, this only happens on
> > Travis, which still uses GCC 7.3.0 for arm (why?). With newer, more
> > efficient compilers there is no such issue.
> 
> On this last point, gcc 7.3 is the current GCC release that doesn't have
> regressions elsewhere until we reach gcc-9, for which I cannot find good
> pre-built toolchains.  We can get gcc-8.3 (or 8.2?  I forget) from Arm
> Ltd now, but that has problems on x86.

Thanks for the background Tom, I wondered about the reasons behind.

Regards, Andreas


--
Andreas Dannenberg
Texas Instruments Inc