From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A5CDFCB8 for ; Wed, 17 Jul 2019 09:28:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from userp2120.oracle.com (userp2120.oracle.com [156.151.31.85]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5803063D for ; Wed, 17 Jul 2019 09:28:09 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2019 12:27:53 +0300 From: Dan Carpenter To: Takashi Iwai Message-ID: <20190717092753.GB3111@kadam> References: <7b73e1b7-cc34-982d-2a9c-acf62b88da16@linuxfoundation.org> <20190628205102.GA3131@agluck-desk2.amr.corp.intel.com> <20190629134329.GA4620@andrea> <20190630163120.GA13925@chatter.i7.local> <20190701072013.GJ3402@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20190717092313.GA3111@kadam> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190717092313.GA3111@kadam> Cc: Peter Zijlstra , ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [MAINTAINERS SUMMIT] Patch version changes in commit logs? List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 12:23:13PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: > On Mon, Jul 01, 2019 at 09:53:54AM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote: > > On Mon, 01 Jul 2019 09:49:56 +0200, > > Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, 1 Jul 2019, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > > > > > > On Sun, Jun 30, 2019 at 12:31:20PM -0400, Konstantin Ryabitsev wrote: > > > > > On Sat, Jun 29, 2019 at 05:16:18PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > > > > > > Makes all sense to me. One question/remark: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst says: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > "If the patch follows from a mailing list discussion, give a URL to the > > > > > > > mailing list archive; use the https://lkml.kernel.org/ redirector with > > > > > > > a ``Message-Id``, to ensure that the links cannot become stale." > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and it does not mention "lore.kernel.org": does this doc want an update? > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes. lkml.kernel.org/r was the initial redirector, but lore is the new > > > > > > thing. > > > > > > > > > > FYI, lkml.kernel.org == lore.kernel.org in all respects. Using > > > > > lore.kernel.org/r/ will match *any* mailing list archived at > > > > > lore.kernel.org (for the full list, see https://lore.kernel.org/lists.html). > > > > > I prefer people use lore.kernel.org because that name doesn't imply that the > > > > > search will only match LKML. > > > > > > > > I much prefer https://lkml.kernel.org/r/$msgid over lore, because I can > > > > change it to marc.info with a single character change. And while lore > > > > has improved, the thing is still a horrible horrible ugly site (an > > > > actual fixed frame for the thread overview, and hiding that 'Reply > > > > instructions' and 'LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org' somewhow would > > > > already be a big improvement). > > > > > > But lore allows to reference all mailinglists which are archived > > > there, while lkml.k.org is hardcoded to lkml. > > > > > > > Also, strlen("lkml.kernel.org/r/") < strlen("lore.kernel.org/lkml/"). > > > > > > Come on .... > > > > If the size matters, how about just putting the message id? > > Something like: > > Link: > > We could add an option to `git am` to save the Message-ID automatically. Oh, there already is a --message-id option... Duh. regards, dan carpenter