All of
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Brown <>
To: Linus Walleij <>
Cc: Andrey Smirnov <>,,,
	Mark Brown <>
Subject: Applied "spi: gpio: Add SPI_MASTER_GPIO_SS flag" to the spi tree
Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2019 18:58:19 +0100 (BST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <>

The patch

   spi: gpio: Add SPI_MASTER_GPIO_SS flag

has been applied to the spi tree at for-5.3

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.  

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.


From 2922d1cc1696200a3e1fd6d82a7798fcd2cadf12 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Linus Walleij <>
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2019 22:46:51 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] spi: gpio: Add SPI_MASTER_GPIO_SS flag

The GPIO SPI master has some code in its local CS
callback to set the initial sck GPIO value. This was
lost in the commit converting it to use SPI core
GPIO handling as this callback isn't called if the
internal GPIO handling is active.

Add the special SPI_MASTER_GPIO_SS to ascertain it
gets called anyway so we get the initial SCK setting
right. There is some platform provided GPIO handling
there as well but this will be skipped as the cs_gpios
will be NULL.

My test targets seem not to care about the initial
SCK value so I am uncertain if this is a regression,
but to preserve the previous semantic we better do

Cc: Andrey Smirnov <>
Fixes: 249e2632dcd0 ("spi: gpio: Don't request CS GPIO in DT use-case")
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <>
 drivers/spi/spi-gpio.c | 6 ++++++
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-gpio.c b/drivers/spi/spi-gpio.c
index eca9d52ecf65..9eb82150666e 100644
--- a/drivers/spi/spi-gpio.c
+++ b/drivers/spi/spi-gpio.c
@@ -410,6 +410,12 @@ static int spi_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	bb = &spi_gpio->bitbang;
 	bb->master = master;
+	/*
+	 * There is some additional business, apart from driving the CS GPIO
+	 * line, that we need to do on selection. This makes the local
+	 * callback for chipselect always get called.
+	 */
+	master->flags |= SPI_MASTER_GPIO_SS;
 	bb->chipselect = spi_gpio_chipselect;
 	bb->set_line_direction = spi_gpio_set_direction;

      reply	other threads:[~2019-07-17 17:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-07-16 20:46 [PATCH] spi: gpio: Add SPI_MASTER_GPIO_SS flag Linus Walleij
2019-07-17 17:58 ` Mark Brown [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \ \ \ \ \ \ \
    --subject='Re: Applied "spi: gpio: Add SPI_MASTER_GPIO_SS flag" to the spi tree' \

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.