All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: john.hubbard@gmail.com
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: "Alexander Viro" <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	"Björn Töpel" <bjorn.topel@intel.com>,
	"Boaz Harrosh" <boaz@plexistor.com>,
	"Christoph Hellwig" <hch@lst.de>,
	"Daniel Vetter" <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
	"Dan Williams" <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
	"Dave Chinner" <david@fromorbit.com>,
	"David Airlie" <airlied@linux.ie>,
	"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	"Ilya Dryomov" <idryomov@gmail.com>, "Jan Kara" <jack@suse.cz>,
	"Jason Gunthorpe" <jgg@ziepe.ca>, "Jens Axboe" <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	"Jérôme Glisse" <jglisse@redhat.com>,
	"Johannes Thumshirn" <jthumshirn@suse.de>,
	"Magnus Karlsson" <magnus.karlsson@intel.com>,
	"Matthew Wilcox" <willy@infradead.org>,
	"Miklos Szeredi" <miklos@szeredi.hu>,
	"Ming Lei" <ming.lei@redhat.com>, "Sage Weil" <sage@redhat.com>,
	"Santosh Shilimkar" <santosh.shilimkar@oracle.com>,
	"Yan Zheng" <zyan@redhat.com>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org,
	bpf@vger.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"John Hubbard" <jhubbard@nvidia.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] mm/gup: introduce __put_user_pages()
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2019 15:34:13 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190722223415.13269-2-jhubbard@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190722223415.13269-1-jhubbard@nvidia.com>

From: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>

Add a more capable variation of put_user_pages() to the
API set, and call it from the simple ones.

The new __put_user_pages() takes an enum that handles the various
combinations of needing to call set_page_dirty() or
set_page_dirty_lock(), before calling put_user_page().

Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>
---
 include/linux/mm.h |  58 ++++++++++++++++++-
 mm/gup.c           | 137 ++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
 2 files changed, 124 insertions(+), 71 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h
index 0334ca97c584..7218585681b2 100644
--- a/include/linux/mm.h
+++ b/include/linux/mm.h
@@ -1057,8 +1057,62 @@ static inline void put_user_page(struct page *page)
 	put_page(page);
 }
 
-void put_user_pages_dirty(struct page **pages, unsigned long npages);
-void put_user_pages_dirty_lock(struct page **pages, unsigned long npages);
+enum pup_flags_t {
+	PUP_FLAGS_CLEAN		= 0,
+	PUP_FLAGS_DIRTY		= 1,
+	PUP_FLAGS_LOCK		= 2,
+	PUP_FLAGS_DIRTY_LOCK	= 3,
+};
+
+void __put_user_pages(struct page **pages, unsigned long npages,
+		      enum pup_flags_t flags);
+
+/**
+ * put_user_pages_dirty() - release and dirty an array of gup-pinned pages
+ * @pages:  array of pages to be marked dirty and released.
+ * @npages: number of pages in the @pages array.
+ *
+ * "gup-pinned page" refers to a page that has had one of the get_user_pages()
+ * variants called on that page.
+ *
+ * For each page in the @pages array, make that page (or its head page, if a
+ * compound page) dirty, if it was previously listed as clean. Then, release
+ * the page using put_user_page().
+ *
+ * Please see the put_user_page() documentation for details.
+ *
+ * set_page_dirty(), which does not lock the page, is used here.
+ * Therefore, it is the caller's responsibility to ensure that this is
+ * safe. If not, then put_user_pages_dirty_lock() should be called instead.
+ *
+ */
+static inline void put_user_pages_dirty(struct page **pages,
+					unsigned long npages)
+{
+	__put_user_pages(pages, npages, PUP_FLAGS_DIRTY);
+}
+
+/**
+ * put_user_pages_dirty_lock() - release and dirty an array of gup-pinned pages
+ * @pages:  array of pages to be marked dirty and released.
+ * @npages: number of pages in the @pages array.
+ *
+ * For each page in the @pages array, make that page (or its head page, if a
+ * compound page) dirty, if it was previously listed as clean. Then, release
+ * the page using put_user_page().
+ *
+ * Please see the put_user_page() documentation for details.
+ *
+ * This is just like put_user_pages_dirty(), except that it invokes
+ * set_page_dirty_lock(), instead of set_page_dirty().
+ *
+ */
+static inline void put_user_pages_dirty_lock(struct page **pages,
+					     unsigned long npages)
+{
+	__put_user_pages(pages, npages, PUP_FLAGS_DIRTY_LOCK);
+}
+
 void put_user_pages(struct page **pages, unsigned long npages);
 
 #if defined(CONFIG_SPARSEMEM) && !defined(CONFIG_SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP)
diff --git a/mm/gup.c b/mm/gup.c
index 98f13ab37bac..6831ef064d76 100644
--- a/mm/gup.c
+++ b/mm/gup.c
@@ -29,87 +29,86 @@ struct follow_page_context {
 	unsigned int page_mask;
 };
 
-typedef int (*set_dirty_func_t)(struct page *page);
-
-static void __put_user_pages_dirty(struct page **pages,
-				   unsigned long npages,
-				   set_dirty_func_t sdf)
-{
-	unsigned long index;
-
-	for (index = 0; index < npages; index++) {
-		struct page *page = compound_head(pages[index]);
-
-		/*
-		 * Checking PageDirty at this point may race with
-		 * clear_page_dirty_for_io(), but that's OK. Two key cases:
-		 *
-		 * 1) This code sees the page as already dirty, so it skips
-		 * the call to sdf(). That could happen because
-		 * clear_page_dirty_for_io() called page_mkclean(),
-		 * followed by set_page_dirty(). However, now the page is
-		 * going to get written back, which meets the original
-		 * intention of setting it dirty, so all is well:
-		 * clear_page_dirty_for_io() goes on to call
-		 * TestClearPageDirty(), and write the page back.
-		 *
-		 * 2) This code sees the page as clean, so it calls sdf().
-		 * The page stays dirty, despite being written back, so it
-		 * gets written back again in the next writeback cycle.
-		 * This is harmless.
-		 */
-		if (!PageDirty(page))
-			sdf(page);
-
-		put_user_page(page);
-	}
-}
-
 /**
- * put_user_pages_dirty() - release and dirty an array of gup-pinned pages
+ * __put_user_pages() - release an array of gup-pinned pages.
  * @pages:  array of pages to be marked dirty and released.
  * @npages: number of pages in the @pages array.
+ * @flags: additional hints, to be applied to each page:
  *
- * "gup-pinned page" refers to a page that has had one of the get_user_pages()
- * variants called on that page.
+ *	PUP_FLAGS_CLEAN: no additional steps required. (Consider calling
+ *			 put_user_pages() directly, instead.)
  *
- * For each page in the @pages array, make that page (or its head page, if a
- * compound page) dirty, if it was previously listed as clean. Then, release
- * the page using put_user_page().
+ *	PUP_FLAGS_DIRTY: Call set_page_dirty() on the page (if not already
+ *			 dirty).
  *
- * Please see the put_user_page() documentation for details.
+ *      PUP_FLAGS_LOCK: meaningless by itself, but included in order to show
+ *			the numeric relationship between the flags.
  *
- * set_page_dirty(), which does not lock the page, is used here.
- * Therefore, it is the caller's responsibility to ensure that this is
- * safe. If not, then put_user_pages_dirty_lock() should be called instead.
+ *      PUP_FLAGS_DIRTY_LOCK: Call set_page_dirty_lock() on the page (if not
+ *			      already dirty).
  *
+ * For each page in the @pages array, release the page using put_user_page().
  */
-void put_user_pages_dirty(struct page **pages, unsigned long npages)
+void __put_user_pages(struct page **pages, unsigned long npages,
+		      enum pup_flags_t flags)
 {
-	__put_user_pages_dirty(pages, npages, set_page_dirty);
-}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(put_user_pages_dirty);
+	unsigned long index;
 
-/**
- * put_user_pages_dirty_lock() - release and dirty an array of gup-pinned pages
- * @pages:  array of pages to be marked dirty and released.
- * @npages: number of pages in the @pages array.
- *
- * For each page in the @pages array, make that page (or its head page, if a
- * compound page) dirty, if it was previously listed as clean. Then, release
- * the page using put_user_page().
- *
- * Please see the put_user_page() documentation for details.
- *
- * This is just like put_user_pages_dirty(), except that it invokes
- * set_page_dirty_lock(), instead of set_page_dirty().
- *
- */
-void put_user_pages_dirty_lock(struct page **pages, unsigned long npages)
-{
-	__put_user_pages_dirty(pages, npages, set_page_dirty_lock);
+	/*
+	 * TODO: this can be optimized for huge pages: if a series of pages is
+	 * physically contiguous and part of the same compound page, then a
+	 * single operation to the head page should suffice.
+	 */
+
+	for (index = 0; index < npages; index++) {
+		struct page *page = compound_head(pages[index]);
+
+		switch (flags) {
+		case PUP_FLAGS_CLEAN:
+			break;
+
+		case PUP_FLAGS_DIRTY:
+			/*
+			 * Checking PageDirty at this point may race with
+			 * clear_page_dirty_for_io(), but that's OK. Two key
+			 * cases:
+			 *
+			 * 1) This code sees the page as already dirty, so it
+			 * skips the call to set_page_dirty(). That could happen
+			 * because clear_page_dirty_for_io() called
+			 * page_mkclean(), followed by set_page_dirty().
+			 * However, now the page is going to get written back,
+			 * which meets the original intention of setting it
+			 * dirty, so all is well: clear_page_dirty_for_io() goes
+			 * on to call TestClearPageDirty(), and write the page
+			 * back.
+			 *
+			 * 2) This code sees the page as clean, so it calls
+			 * set_page_dirty(). The page stays dirty, despite being
+			 * written back, so it gets written back again in the
+			 * next writeback cycle. This is harmless.
+			 */
+			if (!PageDirty(page))
+				set_page_dirty(page);
+			break;
+
+		case PUP_FLAGS_LOCK:
+			VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(flags == PUP_FLAGS_LOCK);
+			/*
+			 * Shouldn't happen, but treat it as _DIRTY_LOCK if
+			 * it does: fall through.
+			 */
+
+		case PUP_FLAGS_DIRTY_LOCK:
+			/* Same comments as for PUP_FLAGS_DIRTY apply here. */
+			if (!PageDirty(page))
+				set_page_dirty_lock(page);
+			break;
+		};
+		put_user_page(page);
+	}
 }
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(put_user_pages_dirty_lock);
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(__put_user_pages);
 
 /**
  * put_user_pages() - release an array of gup-pinned pages.
-- 
2.22.0


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID
From: john.hubbard@gmail.com
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: "Alexander Viro" <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	"Björn Töpel" <bjorn.topel@intel.com>,
	"Boaz Harrosh" <boaz@plexistor.com>,
	"Christoph Hellwig" <hch@lst.de>,
	"Daniel Vetter" <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
	"Dan Williams" <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
	"Dave Chinner" <david@fromorbit.com>,
	"David Airlie" <airlied@linux.ie>,
	"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	"Ilya Dryomov" <idryomov@gmail.com>, "Jan Kara" <jack@suse.cz>,
	"Jason Gunthorpe" <jgg@ziepe.ca>, "Jens Axboe" <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	"Jérôme Glisse" <jglisse@redhat.com>,
	"Johannes Thumshirn" <jthumshirn@suse.de>,
	"Magnus Karlsson" <magnus.karlsson@intel.com>,
	"Matthew Wilcox" <willy@infradead.org>,
	"Miklos Szeredi" <miklos@szeredi.hu>,
	"Ming Lei" <ming.lei@redhat.com>, "Sage Weil" <sage@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] mm/gup: introduce __put_user_pages()
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2019 15:34:13 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190722223415.13269-2-jhubbard@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190722223415.13269-1-jhubbard@nvidia.com>

From: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>

Add a more capable variation of put_user_pages() to the
API set, and call it from the simple ones.

The new __put_user_pages() takes an enum that handles the various
combinations of needing to call set_page_dirty() or
set_page_dirty_lock(), before calling put_user_page().

Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>
---
 include/linux/mm.h |  58 ++++++++++++++++++-
 mm/gup.c           | 137 ++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
 2 files changed, 124 insertions(+), 71 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h
index 0334ca97c584..7218585681b2 100644
--- a/include/linux/mm.h
+++ b/include/linux/mm.h
@@ -1057,8 +1057,62 @@ static inline void put_user_page(struct page *page)
 	put_page(page);
 }
 
-void put_user_pages_dirty(struct page **pages, unsigned long npages);
-void put_user_pages_dirty_lock(struct page **pages, unsigned long npages);
+enum pup_flags_t {
+	PUP_FLAGS_CLEAN		= 0,
+	PUP_FLAGS_DIRTY		= 1,
+	PUP_FLAGS_LOCK		= 2,
+	PUP_FLAGS_DIRTY_LOCK	= 3,
+};
+
+void __put_user_pages(struct page **pages, unsigned long npages,
+		      enum pup_flags_t flags);
+
+/**
+ * put_user_pages_dirty() - release and dirty an array of gup-pinned pages
+ * @pages:  array of pages to be marked dirty and released.
+ * @npages: number of pages in the @pages array.
+ *
+ * "gup-pinned page" refers to a page that has had one of the get_user_pages()
+ * variants called on that page.
+ *
+ * For each page in the @pages array, make that page (or its head page, if a
+ * compound page) dirty, if it was previously listed as clean. Then, release
+ * the page using put_user_page().
+ *
+ * Please see the put_user_page() documentation for details.
+ *
+ * set_page_dirty(), which does not lock the page, is used here.
+ * Therefore, it is the caller's responsibility to ensure that this is
+ * safe. If not, then put_user_pages_dirty_lock() should be called instead.
+ *
+ */
+static inline void put_user_pages_dirty(struct page **pages,
+					unsigned long npages)
+{
+	__put_user_pages(pages, npages, PUP_FLAGS_DIRTY);
+}
+
+/**
+ * put_user_pages_dirty_lock() - release and dirty an array of gup-pinned pages
+ * @pages:  array of pages to be marked dirty and released.
+ * @npages: number of pages in the @pages array.
+ *
+ * For each page in the @pages array, make that page (or its head page, if a
+ * compound page) dirty, if it was previously listed as clean. Then, release
+ * the page using put_user_page().
+ *
+ * Please see the put_user_page() documentation for details.
+ *
+ * This is just like put_user_pages_dirty(), except that it invokes
+ * set_page_dirty_lock(), instead of set_page_dirty().
+ *
+ */
+static inline void put_user_pages_dirty_lock(struct page **pages,
+					     unsigned long npages)
+{
+	__put_user_pages(pages, npages, PUP_FLAGS_DIRTY_LOCK);
+}
+
 void put_user_pages(struct page **pages, unsigned long npages);
 
 #if defined(CONFIG_SPARSEMEM) && !defined(CONFIG_SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP)
diff --git a/mm/gup.c b/mm/gup.c
index 98f13ab37bac..6831ef064d76 100644
--- a/mm/gup.c
+++ b/mm/gup.c
@@ -29,87 +29,86 @@ struct follow_page_context {
 	unsigned int page_mask;
 };
 
-typedef int (*set_dirty_func_t)(struct page *page);
-
-static void __put_user_pages_dirty(struct page **pages,
-				   unsigned long npages,
-				   set_dirty_func_t sdf)
-{
-	unsigned long index;
-
-	for (index = 0; index < npages; index++) {
-		struct page *page = compound_head(pages[index]);
-
-		/*
-		 * Checking PageDirty at this point may race with
-		 * clear_page_dirty_for_io(), but that's OK. Two key cases:
-		 *
-		 * 1) This code sees the page as already dirty, so it skips
-		 * the call to sdf(). That could happen because
-		 * clear_page_dirty_for_io() called page_mkclean(),
-		 * followed by set_page_dirty(). However, now the page is
-		 * going to get written back, which meets the original
-		 * intention of setting it dirty, so all is well:
-		 * clear_page_dirty_for_io() goes on to call
-		 * TestClearPageDirty(), and write the page back.
-		 *
-		 * 2) This code sees the page as clean, so it calls sdf().
-		 * The page stays dirty, despite being written back, so it
-		 * gets written back again in the next writeback cycle.
-		 * This is harmless.
-		 */
-		if (!PageDirty(page))
-			sdf(page);
-
-		put_user_page(page);
-	}
-}
-
 /**
- * put_user_pages_dirty() - release and dirty an array of gup-pinned pages
+ * __put_user_pages() - release an array of gup-pinned pages.
  * @pages:  array of pages to be marked dirty and released.
  * @npages: number of pages in the @pages array.
+ * @flags: additional hints, to be applied to each page:
  *
- * "gup-pinned page" refers to a page that has had one of the get_user_pages()
- * variants called on that page.
+ *	PUP_FLAGS_CLEAN: no additional steps required. (Consider calling
+ *			 put_user_pages() directly, instead.)
  *
- * For each page in the @pages array, make that page (or its head page, if a
- * compound page) dirty, if it was previously listed as clean. Then, release
- * the page using put_user_page().
+ *	PUP_FLAGS_DIRTY: Call set_page_dirty() on the page (if not already
+ *			 dirty).
  *
- * Please see the put_user_page() documentation for details.
+ *      PUP_FLAGS_LOCK: meaningless by itself, but included in order to show
+ *			the numeric relationship between the flags.
  *
- * set_page_dirty(), which does not lock the page, is used here.
- * Therefore, it is the caller's responsibility to ensure that this is
- * safe. If not, then put_user_pages_dirty_lock() should be called instead.
+ *      PUP_FLAGS_DIRTY_LOCK: Call set_page_dirty_lock() on the page (if not
+ *			      already dirty).
  *
+ * For each page in the @pages array, release the page using put_user_page().
  */
-void put_user_pages_dirty(struct page **pages, unsigned long npages)
+void __put_user_pages(struct page **pages, unsigned long npages,
+		      enum pup_flags_t flags)
 {
-	__put_user_pages_dirty(pages, npages, set_page_dirty);
-}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(put_user_pages_dirty);
+	unsigned long index;
 
-/**
- * put_user_pages_dirty_lock() - release and dirty an array of gup-pinned pages
- * @pages:  array of pages to be marked dirty and released.
- * @npages: number of pages in the @pages array.
- *
- * For each page in the @pages array, make that page (or its head page, if a
- * compound page) dirty, if it was previously listed as clean. Then, release
- * the page using put_user_page().
- *
- * Please see the put_user_page() documentation for details.
- *
- * This is just like put_user_pages_dirty(), except that it invokes
- * set_page_dirty_lock(), instead of set_page_dirty().
- *
- */
-void put_user_pages_dirty_lock(struct page **pages, unsigned long npages)
-{
-	__put_user_pages_dirty(pages, npages, set_page_dirty_lock);
+	/*
+	 * TODO: this can be optimized for huge pages: if a series of pages is
+	 * physically contiguous and part of the same compound page, then a
+	 * single operation to the head page should suffice.
+	 */
+
+	for (index = 0; index < npages; index++) {
+		struct page *page = compound_head(pages[index]);
+
+		switch (flags) {
+		case PUP_FLAGS_CLEAN:
+			break;
+
+		case PUP_FLAGS_DIRTY:
+			/*
+			 * Checking PageDirty at this point may race with
+			 * clear_page_dirty_for_io(), but that's OK. Two key
+			 * cases:
+			 *
+			 * 1) This code sees the page as already dirty, so it
+			 * skips the call to set_page_dirty(). That could happen
+			 * because clear_page_dirty_for_io() called
+			 * page_mkclean(), followed by set_page_dirty().
+			 * However, now the page is going to get written back,
+			 * which meets the original intention of setting it
+			 * dirty, so all is well: clear_page_dirty_for_io() goes
+			 * on to call TestClearPageDirty(), and write the page
+			 * back.
+			 *
+			 * 2) This code sees the page as clean, so it calls
+			 * set_page_dirty(). The page stays dirty, despite being
+			 * written back, so it gets written back again in the
+			 * next writeback cycle. This is harmless.
+			 */
+			if (!PageDirty(page))
+				set_page_dirty(page);
+			break;
+
+		case PUP_FLAGS_LOCK:
+			VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(flags == PUP_FLAGS_LOCK);
+			/*
+			 * Shouldn't happen, but treat it as _DIRTY_LOCK if
+			 * it does: fall through.
+			 */
+
+		case PUP_FLAGS_DIRTY_LOCK:
+			/* Same comments as for PUP_FLAGS_DIRTY apply here. */
+			if (!PageDirty(page))
+				set_page_dirty_lock(page);
+			break;
+		};
+		put_user_page(page);
+	}
 }
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(put_user_pages_dirty_lock);
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(__put_user_pages);
 
 /**
  * put_user_pages() - release an array of gup-pinned pages.
-- 
2.22.0

  reply	other threads:[~2019-07-22 22:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-07-22 22:34 [PATCH 0/3] introduce __put_user_pages(), convert a few call sites john.hubbard
2019-07-22 22:34 ` john.hubbard
2019-07-22 22:34 ` john.hubbard [this message]
2019-07-22 22:34   ` [PATCH 1/3] mm/gup: introduce __put_user_pages() john.hubbard
2019-07-23  5:53   ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-07-23  6:33     ` John Hubbard
2019-07-23  6:33       ` John Hubbard
2019-07-23 15:36       ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-07-23 15:36         ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-07-22 22:34 ` [PATCH 2/3] drivers/gpu/drm/via: convert put_page() to put_user_page*() john.hubbard
2019-07-22 22:34   ` john.hubbard
2019-07-22 22:34 ` [PATCH 3/3] net/xdp: " john.hubbard
2019-07-22 22:34   ` john.hubbard
2019-07-23  0:25   ` Ira Weiny
2019-07-23  0:25     ` Ira Weiny
2019-07-23  4:41     ` John Hubbard
2019-07-23  4:41       ` John Hubbard
2019-07-23 12:47       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-07-23 12:47         ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-07-23 18:06       ` Ira Weiny
2019-07-23 18:06         ` Ira Weiny
2019-07-23 23:24         ` John Hubbard
2019-07-23 23:24           ` John Hubbard

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190722223415.13269-2-jhubbard@nvidia.com \
    --to=john.hubbard@gmail.com \
    --cc=airlied@linux.ie \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=bjorn.topel@intel.com \
    --cc=boaz@plexistor.com \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=idryomov@gmail.com \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
    --cc=jglisse@redhat.com \
    --cc=jhubbard@nvidia.com \
    --cc=jthumshirn@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=magnus.karlsson@intel.com \
    --cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
    --cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sage@redhat.com \
    --cc=santosh.shilimkar@oracle.com \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    --cc=zyan@redhat.com \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH 1/3] mm/gup: introduce __put_user_pages()' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.