All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org>
To: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>,
	Michal Marek <michal.lkml@markovi.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org,
	clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com,
	Peter Smith <peter.smith@linaro.org>,
	Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com>,
	Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
	Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Subject: [PATCH v3] kbuild: Check for unknown options with cc-option usage in Kconfig and clang
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2019 09:48:03 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190730164803.45080-1-swboyd@chromium.org> (raw)

If the particular version of clang a user has doesn't enable
-Werror=unknown-warning-option by default, even though it is the
default[1], then make sure to pass the option to the Kconfig cc-option
command so that testing options from Kconfig files works properly.
Otherwise, depending on the default values setup in the clang toolchain
we will silently assume options such as -Wmaybe-uninitialized are
supported by clang, when they really aren't.

A compilation issue only started happening for me once commit
589834b3a009 ("kbuild: Add -Werror=unknown-warning-option to
CLANG_FLAGS") was applied on top of commit b303c6df80c9 ("kbuild:
compute false-positive -Wmaybe-uninitialized cases in Kconfig"). This
leads kbuild to try and test for the existence of the
-Wmaybe-uninitialized flag with the cc-option command in
scripts/Kconfig.include, and it doesn't see an error returned from the
option test so it sets the config value to Y. Then the Makefile tries to
pass the unknown option on the command line and
-Werror=unknown-warning-option catches the invalid option and breaks the
build. Before commit 589834b3a009 ("kbuild: Add
-Werror=unknown-warning-option to CLANG_FLAGS") the build works fine,
but any cc-option test of a warning option in Kconfig files silently
evaluates to true, even if the warning option flag isn't supported on
clang.

Note: This doesn't change cc-option usages in Makefiles because those
use a different rule that includes KBUILD_CFLAGS by default (see the
__cc-option command in scripts/Kbuild.incluide). The KBUILD_CFLAGS
variable already has the -Werror=unknown-warning-option flag set. Thanks
to Doug for pointing out the different rule.

[1] https://clang.llvm.org/docs/DiagnosticsReference.html#wunknown-warning-option
Cc: Peter Smith <peter.smith@linaro.org>
Cc: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com>
Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Cc: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org>
---
 Makefile                | 1 +
 scripts/Kconfig.include | 2 +-
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
index 9be5834073f8..517d0a3f6539 100644
--- a/Makefile
+++ b/Makefile
@@ -536,6 +536,7 @@ KBUILD_AFLAGS	+= $(CLANG_FLAGS)
 export CLANG_FLAGS
 endif
 
+
 # The expansion should be delayed until arch/$(SRCARCH)/Makefile is included.
 # Some architectures define CROSS_COMPILE in arch/$(SRCARCH)/Makefile.
 # CC_VERSION_TEXT is referenced from Kconfig (so it needs export),
diff --git a/scripts/Kconfig.include b/scripts/Kconfig.include
index 8a5c4d645eb1..4bbf4fc163a2 100644
--- a/scripts/Kconfig.include
+++ b/scripts/Kconfig.include
@@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ failure = $(if-success,$(1),n,y)
 
 # $(cc-option,<flag>)
 # Return y if the compiler supports <flag>, n otherwise
-cc-option = $(success,$(CC) -Werror $(1) -E -x c /dev/null -o /dev/null)
+cc-option = $(success,$(CC) -Werror $(CLANG_FLAGS) $(1) -E -x c /dev/null -o /dev/null)
 
 # $(ld-option,<flag>)
 # Return y if the linker supports <flag>, n otherwise
-- 
Sent by a computer through tubes


             reply	other threads:[~2019-07-30 16:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-07-30 16:48 Stephen Boyd [this message]
2019-07-30 16:49 ` [PATCH v3] kbuild: Check for unknown options with cc-option usage in Kconfig and clang Nathan Chancellor
2019-07-30 16:51   ` Masahiro Yamada
2019-08-01  2:56     ` Masahiro Yamada

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190730164803.45080-1-swboyd@chromium.org \
    --to=swboyd@chromium.org \
    --cc=clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=dianders@chromium.org \
    --cc=linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=michal.lkml@markovi.net \
    --cc=natechancellor@gmail.com \
    --cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
    --cc=peter.smith@linaro.org \
    --cc=yamada.masahiro@socionext.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.