From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Petazzoni Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2019 17:46:05 +0200 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 2/2] toolchain: enable musl for riscv In-Reply-To: <20190730102331.25609-2-joerg.krause@embedded.rocks> References: <20190730102331.25609-1-joerg.krause@embedded.rocks> <20190730102331.25609-2-joerg.krause@embedded.rocks> Message-ID: <20190730174605.4481ad0d@windsurf> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Hello, On Tue, 30 Jul 2019 12:23:31 +0200 J?rg Krause wrote: > Since version 1.1.23 musl supports the RISC-V architecture. > > Signed-off-by: J?rg Krause > --- > toolchain/toolchain-buildroot/Config.in | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/toolchain/toolchain-buildroot/Config.in b/toolchain/toolchain-buildroot/Config.in > index d9f16e2a3a..b4168bd40c 100644 > --- a/toolchain/toolchain-buildroot/Config.in > +++ b/toolchain/toolchain-buildroot/Config.in > @@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ config BR2_TOOLCHAIN_BUILDROOT_MUSL > depends on BR2_aarch64 || BR2_arm || BR2_armeb || BR2_i386 || \ > BR2_microblaze || BR2_mips || BR2_mipsel || BR2_mips64 || \ > BR2_mips64el || BR2_or1k || BR2_powerpc || BR2_powerpc64 || \ > - BR2_powerpc64le || BR2_sh || BR2_x86_64 > + BR2_powerpc64le || BR2_riscv || BR2_sh || BR2_x86_64 My understanding is that musl 1.1.23 only supports RISC-V 64 bits, not RISC-V 32 bits, so that should probably be "BR2_RISCV_64" instead of just "BR2_riscv". Best regards, Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Bootlin Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering https://bootlin.com