From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D290BC433FF for ; Thu, 1 Aug 2019 04:22:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95AA9214DA for ; Thu, 1 Aug 2019 04:22:20 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1564633340; bh=wX3aVTKu4GQPcVJzRJpgGpEpqupjqD0i6Q9nh8qWnK4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-ID:From; b=p1f9Kg3fE61OM26lg/6MVHwZl7Ss5bMBm/pSfX/bzD+PBz0UX3qs/WbcfZ8WX5h7d VV9mFhXgnXO04NOQ2TwW06KTniqg7DGqE++ExwNAR4ZQ4C76cwUyhbH3QZX7ablydR amd08o3hl7OcmHTXNIVdBv2LPTwXZooirUN/dc1I= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727537AbfHAEWR (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Aug 2019 00:22:17 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:36006 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725283AbfHAEWR (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Aug 2019 00:22:17 -0400 Received: from localhost (c-98-234-77-170.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [98.234.77.170]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 92CE8206B8; Thu, 1 Aug 2019 04:22:15 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1564633335; bh=wX3aVTKu4GQPcVJzRJpgGpEpqupjqD0i6Q9nh8qWnK4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=b/SwCI6Cpy109EtBNqad4RqL+FNau8hYh1Ex0ejxlmXr0cACwc1LtzB550QQwlawK qaJksGju8dh82nrD+EQ3L6TSHRYFQbUA10JAJLznO6ISLrbmlfp2ylyXkJiQ5nET5+ LFNEyHxADIBaqxti0VT9erTDxk5gm4igGVz7zE4o= Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2019 21:22:15 -0700 From: Jaegeuk Kim To: Chao Yu Cc: Chao Yu , linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 RESEND] f2fs: introduce sb.required_features to store incompatible features Message-ID: <20190801042215.GC84433@jaegeuk-macbookpro.roam.corp.google.com> References: <20190729150351.12223-1-chao@kernel.org> <20190730231850.GA7097@jaegeuk-macbookpro.roam.corp.google.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.8.2 (2017-04-18) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 07/31, Chao Yu wrote: > On 2019/7/31 7:18, Jaegeuk Kim wrote: > > On 07/29, Chao Yu wrote: > >> From: Chao Yu > >> > >> Later after this patch was merged, all new incompatible feature's > >> bit should be added into sb.required_features field, and define new > >> feature function with F2FS_INCOMPAT_FEATURE_FUNCS() macro. > >> > >> Then during mount, we will do sanity check with enabled features in > >> image, if there are features in sb.required_features that kernel can > >> not recognize, just fail the mount. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Chao Yu > >> --- > >> v3: > >> - change commit title. > >> - fix wrong macro name. > >> fs/f2fs/f2fs.h | 15 +++++++++++++++ > >> fs/f2fs/super.c | 10 ++++++++++ > >> include/linux/f2fs_fs.h | 3 ++- > >> 3 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > >> > >> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h > >> index a6eb828af57f..b8e17d4ddb8d 100644 > >> --- a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h > >> +++ b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h > >> @@ -163,6 +163,15 @@ struct f2fs_mount_info { > >> #define F2FS_CLEAR_FEATURE(sbi, mask) \ > >> (sbi->raw_super->feature &= ~cpu_to_le32(mask)) > >> > >> +#define F2FS_INCOMPAT_FEATURES 0 > >> + > >> +#define F2FS_HAS_INCOMPAT_FEATURE(sbi, mask) \ > >> + ((sbi->raw_super->required_features & cpu_to_le32(mask)) != 0) > >> +#define F2FS_SET_INCOMPAT_FEATURE(sbi, mask) \ > >> + (sbi->raw_super->required_features |= cpu_to_le32(mask)) > >> +#define F2FS_CLEAR_INCOMPAT_FEATURE(sbi, mask) \ > >> + (sbi->raw_super->required_features &= ~cpu_to_le32(mask)) > >> + > >> /* > >> * Default values for user and/or group using reserved blocks > >> */ > >> @@ -3585,6 +3594,12 @@ F2FS_FEATURE_FUNCS(lost_found, LOST_FOUND); > >> F2FS_FEATURE_FUNCS(sb_chksum, SB_CHKSUM); > >> F2FS_FEATURE_FUNCS(casefold, CASEFOLD); > >> > >> +#define F2FS_INCOMPAT_FEATURE_FUNCS(name, flagname) \ > >> +static inline int f2fs_sb_has_##name(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi) \ > >> +{ \ > >> + return F2FS_HAS_INCOMPAT_FEATURE(sbi, F2FS_FEATURE_##flagname); \ > >> +} > >> + > >> #ifdef CONFIG_BLK_DEV_ZONED > >> static inline bool f2fs_blkz_is_seq(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, int devi, > >> block_t blkaddr) > >> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/super.c b/fs/f2fs/super.c > >> index 5540fee0fe3f..3701dcce90e6 100644 > >> --- a/fs/f2fs/super.c > >> +++ b/fs/f2fs/super.c > >> @@ -2513,6 +2513,16 @@ static int sanity_check_raw_super(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, > >> return -EINVAL; > >> } > >> > >> + /* check whether current kernel supports all features on image */ > >> + if (le32_to_cpu(raw_super->required_features) & > > > > ... > > #define F2FS_FEATURE_VERITY 0x0400 /* reserved */ > > ... > > #define F2FS_FEATURE_CASEFOLD 0x1000 > > #define F2FS_FEATURE_SUPPORT 0x1BFF > > > > if (le32_to_cpu(raw_super->required_features) & ~F2FS_FEATURE_SUPPORT) { > > ... > > return -EINVAL; > > } > > Um, I thought .required_features are used to store new feature flags from 0x0. > > All 'F2FS_FEATURE_SUPPORT' bits should be stored in sb.feature instead of > sb.required_features, I'm confused... I'm thinking, f2fs-tools sb->required_features f2fs F2FS_FEATURE_SUPPORT v0 0 v0 no_check -> ok v1 0x1BFF v0 no_check -> ok v0 0 v1 0x1BFF -> ok v1 0x1BFF v1 0x1BFF -> ok v2 0x3BFF v1 0x1BFF -> fail v1 0x1BFF v2 0x3BFF -> ok v2 0x3BFF v2 0x3BFF -> ok > > Thanks, > > > > > > >> + ~F2FS_INCOMPAT_FEATURES) { > >> + f2fs_info(sbi, "Unsupported feature: %x: supported: %x", > >> + le32_to_cpu(raw_super->required_features) ^ > >> + F2FS_INCOMPAT_FEATURES, > >> + F2FS_INCOMPAT_FEATURES); > >> + return -EINVAL; > >> + } > >> + > >> /* Check checksum_offset and crc in superblock */ > >> if (__F2FS_HAS_FEATURE(raw_super, F2FS_FEATURE_SB_CHKSUM)) { > >> crc_offset = le32_to_cpu(raw_super->checksum_offset); > >> diff --git a/include/linux/f2fs_fs.h b/include/linux/f2fs_fs.h > >> index a2b36b2e286f..4141be3f219c 100644 > >> --- a/include/linux/f2fs_fs.h > >> +++ b/include/linux/f2fs_fs.h > >> @@ -117,7 +117,8 @@ struct f2fs_super_block { > >> __u8 hot_ext_count; /* # of hot file extension */ > >> __le16 s_encoding; /* Filename charset encoding */ > >> __le16 s_encoding_flags; /* Filename charset encoding flags */ > >> - __u8 reserved[306]; /* valid reserved region */ > >> + __le32 required_features; /* incompatible features to old kernel */ > >> + __u8 reserved[302]; /* valid reserved region */ > >> __le32 crc; /* checksum of superblock */ > >> } __packed; > >> > >> -- > >> 2.22.0 > > . > > From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.3 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34BEDC19759 for ; Thu, 1 Aug 2019 04:22:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.sourceforge.net (lists.sourceforge.net [216.105.38.7]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 07294206B8 for ; Thu, 1 Aug 2019 04:22:24 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=sourceforge.net header.i=@sourceforge.net header.b="NEr7rq0R"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=sf.net header.i=@sf.net header.b="OIYMPeW4"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="b/SwCI6C" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 07294206B8 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux-f2fs-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=sfs-ml-2.v29.lw.sourceforge.com) by sfs-ml-2.v29.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ht2bf-00016M-Nw; Thu, 01 Aug 2019 04:22:23 +0000 Received: from [172.30.20.202] (helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-2.v29.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ht2be-00016F-PA for linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 01 Aug 2019 04:22:22 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceforge.net; s=x; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=T6v0Hy6+ysmT9ltjwHBcIVLbLKn8iAbZ6fuya3fIYTM=; b=NEr7rq0RPRflnUhcqjILf5HEUO vUDDdkUGizjXczEltoCUTLKNs4ZJMwWaT4aMyfR95qS6M0fDN537H6uNMPO/YjdIJq21r3TXvEoGX F8L2iMUNCyRlnM+V27K4SqOKR8OvMDLYyIDk1c3Cj/5P+e7IKiql2GPv6CZtrcU1uCEc=; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sf.net; s=x ; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To :From:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=T6v0Hy6+ysmT9ltjwHBcIVLbLKn8iAbZ6fuya3fIYTM=; b=OIYMPeW43wfLQhezOnK/Gy28zB 9WUSrYQQc88J5ATaOBeWZ+nQFQra0CEuFIhk/LaTyYl6Ljpddu8UK8LKMjSuODokH9tmh6Yr6YwwA vO0kgW3O5Q+6CLHkhZgU/1+4bYRmwcD/BxdcYnDtKxJT8eVN//riaTD4vEhAlwe6XK9I=; Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]) by sfi-mx-1.v28.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) id 1ht2bd-004rpt-Aa for linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 01 Aug 2019 04:22:22 +0000 Received: from localhost (c-98-234-77-170.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [98.234.77.170]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 92CE8206B8; Thu, 1 Aug 2019 04:22:15 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1564633335; bh=wX3aVTKu4GQPcVJzRJpgGpEpqupjqD0i6Q9nh8qWnK4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=b/SwCI6Cpy109EtBNqad4RqL+FNau8hYh1Ex0ejxlmXr0cACwc1LtzB550QQwlawK qaJksGju8dh82nrD+EQ3L6TSHRYFQbUA10JAJLznO6ISLrbmlfp2ylyXkJiQ5nET5+ LFNEyHxADIBaqxti0VT9erTDxk5gm4igGVz7zE4o= Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2019 21:22:15 -0700 From: Jaegeuk Kim To: Chao Yu Message-ID: <20190801042215.GC84433@jaegeuk-macbookpro.roam.corp.google.com> References: <20190729150351.12223-1-chao@kernel.org> <20190730231850.GA7097@jaegeuk-macbookpro.roam.corp.google.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.8.2 (2017-04-18) X-Headers-End: 1ht2bd-004rpt-Aa Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v3 RESEND] f2fs: introduce sb.required_features to store incompatible features X-BeenThere: linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: linux-f2fs-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net On 07/31, Chao Yu wrote: > On 2019/7/31 7:18, Jaegeuk Kim wrote: > > On 07/29, Chao Yu wrote: > >> From: Chao Yu > >> > >> Later after this patch was merged, all new incompatible feature's > >> bit should be added into sb.required_features field, and define new > >> feature function with F2FS_INCOMPAT_FEATURE_FUNCS() macro. > >> > >> Then during mount, we will do sanity check with enabled features in > >> image, if there are features in sb.required_features that kernel can > >> not recognize, just fail the mount. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Chao Yu > >> --- > >> v3: > >> - change commit title. > >> - fix wrong macro name. > >> fs/f2fs/f2fs.h | 15 +++++++++++++++ > >> fs/f2fs/super.c | 10 ++++++++++ > >> include/linux/f2fs_fs.h | 3 ++- > >> 3 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > >> > >> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h > >> index a6eb828af57f..b8e17d4ddb8d 100644 > >> --- a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h > >> +++ b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h > >> @@ -163,6 +163,15 @@ struct f2fs_mount_info { > >> #define F2FS_CLEAR_FEATURE(sbi, mask) \ > >> (sbi->raw_super->feature &= ~cpu_to_le32(mask)) > >> > >> +#define F2FS_INCOMPAT_FEATURES 0 > >> + > >> +#define F2FS_HAS_INCOMPAT_FEATURE(sbi, mask) \ > >> + ((sbi->raw_super->required_features & cpu_to_le32(mask)) != 0) > >> +#define F2FS_SET_INCOMPAT_FEATURE(sbi, mask) \ > >> + (sbi->raw_super->required_features |= cpu_to_le32(mask)) > >> +#define F2FS_CLEAR_INCOMPAT_FEATURE(sbi, mask) \ > >> + (sbi->raw_super->required_features &= ~cpu_to_le32(mask)) > >> + > >> /* > >> * Default values for user and/or group using reserved blocks > >> */ > >> @@ -3585,6 +3594,12 @@ F2FS_FEATURE_FUNCS(lost_found, LOST_FOUND); > >> F2FS_FEATURE_FUNCS(sb_chksum, SB_CHKSUM); > >> F2FS_FEATURE_FUNCS(casefold, CASEFOLD); > >> > >> +#define F2FS_INCOMPAT_FEATURE_FUNCS(name, flagname) \ > >> +static inline int f2fs_sb_has_##name(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi) \ > >> +{ \ > >> + return F2FS_HAS_INCOMPAT_FEATURE(sbi, F2FS_FEATURE_##flagname); \ > >> +} > >> + > >> #ifdef CONFIG_BLK_DEV_ZONED > >> static inline bool f2fs_blkz_is_seq(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, int devi, > >> block_t blkaddr) > >> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/super.c b/fs/f2fs/super.c > >> index 5540fee0fe3f..3701dcce90e6 100644 > >> --- a/fs/f2fs/super.c > >> +++ b/fs/f2fs/super.c > >> @@ -2513,6 +2513,16 @@ static int sanity_check_raw_super(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, > >> return -EINVAL; > >> } > >> > >> + /* check whether current kernel supports all features on image */ > >> + if (le32_to_cpu(raw_super->required_features) & > > > > ... > > #define F2FS_FEATURE_VERITY 0x0400 /* reserved */ > > ... > > #define F2FS_FEATURE_CASEFOLD 0x1000 > > #define F2FS_FEATURE_SUPPORT 0x1BFF > > > > if (le32_to_cpu(raw_super->required_features) & ~F2FS_FEATURE_SUPPORT) { > > ... > > return -EINVAL; > > } > > Um, I thought .required_features are used to store new feature flags from 0x0. > > All 'F2FS_FEATURE_SUPPORT' bits should be stored in sb.feature instead of > sb.required_features, I'm confused... I'm thinking, f2fs-tools sb->required_features f2fs F2FS_FEATURE_SUPPORT v0 0 v0 no_check -> ok v1 0x1BFF v0 no_check -> ok v0 0 v1 0x1BFF -> ok v1 0x1BFF v1 0x1BFF -> ok v2 0x3BFF v1 0x1BFF -> fail v1 0x1BFF v2 0x3BFF -> ok v2 0x3BFF v2 0x3BFF -> ok > > Thanks, > > > > > > >> + ~F2FS_INCOMPAT_FEATURES) { > >> + f2fs_info(sbi, "Unsupported feature: %x: supported: %x", > >> + le32_to_cpu(raw_super->required_features) ^ > >> + F2FS_INCOMPAT_FEATURES, > >> + F2FS_INCOMPAT_FEATURES); > >> + return -EINVAL; > >> + } > >> + > >> /* Check checksum_offset and crc in superblock */ > >> if (__F2FS_HAS_FEATURE(raw_super, F2FS_FEATURE_SB_CHKSUM)) { > >> crc_offset = le32_to_cpu(raw_super->checksum_offset); > >> diff --git a/include/linux/f2fs_fs.h b/include/linux/f2fs_fs.h > >> index a2b36b2e286f..4141be3f219c 100644 > >> --- a/include/linux/f2fs_fs.h > >> +++ b/include/linux/f2fs_fs.h > >> @@ -117,7 +117,8 @@ struct f2fs_super_block { > >> __u8 hot_ext_count; /* # of hot file extension */ > >> __le16 s_encoding; /* Filename charset encoding */ > >> __le16 s_encoding_flags; /* Filename charset encoding flags */ > >> - __u8 reserved[306]; /* valid reserved region */ > >> + __le32 required_features; /* incompatible features to old kernel */ > >> + __u8 reserved[302]; /* valid reserved region */ > >> __le32 crc; /* checksum of superblock */ > >> } __packed; > >> > >> -- > >> 2.22.0 > > . > > _______________________________________________ Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel