From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.3 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED, USER_AGENT_SANE_2 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51192C32750 for ; Fri, 2 Aug 2019 16:11:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22BD921726 for ; Fri, 2 Aug 2019 16:11:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2390264AbfHBQL2 (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Aug 2019 12:11:28 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:48184 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1732543AbfHBQL1 (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Aug 2019 12:11:27 -0400 Received: from gandalf.local.home (cpe-66-24-58-225.stny.res.rr.com [66.24.58.225]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0F61120449; Fri, 2 Aug 2019 16:11:25 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2019 12:11:24 -0400 From: Steven Rostedt To: Jiping Ma Cc: , , , , , Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] tracing: Function stack size and its name mismatch in arm64 Message-ID: <20190802121124.6b41f26a@gandalf.local.home> In-Reply-To: <20190802120920.3b1f4351@gandalf.local.home> References: <20190802094103.163576-1-jiping.ma2@windriver.com> <20190802112259.0530a648@gandalf.local.home> <20190802120920.3b1f4351@gandalf.local.home> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.3 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2 Aug 2019 12:09:20 -0400 Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Fri, 2 Aug 2019 11:22:59 -0400 > Steven Rostedt wrote: > > > I think you are not explaining the issue correctly. From looking at the > > document, I think what you want to say is that the LR is saved *after* > > the data for the function. Is that correct? If so, then yes, it would > > cause the stack tracing algorithm to be incorrect. > > > > [..] > > > Can someone confirm that this is the real issue? > > Does this patch fix your issue? > Bah, I hit "attach" instead of "insert" (I wondered why it didn't insert). Here's the patch without the attachment. -- Steve diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/ftrace.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/ftrace.h index 5ab5200b2bdc..13a4832cfb00 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/ftrace.h +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/ftrace.h @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@ #define HAVE_FUNCTION_GRAPH_FP_TEST #define MCOUNT_ADDR ((unsigned long)_mcount) #define MCOUNT_INSN_SIZE AARCH64_INSN_SIZE +#define ARCH_RET_ADDR_AFTER_LOCAL_VARS 1 #ifndef __ASSEMBLY__ #include diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_stack.c b/kernel/trace/trace_stack.c index 5d16f73898db..050c6bd9beac 100644 --- a/kernel/trace/trace_stack.c +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_stack.c @@ -158,6 +158,18 @@ static void check_stack(unsigned long ip, unsigned long *stack) i++; } +#ifdef ARCH_RET_ADDR_AFTER_LOCAL_VARS + /* + * Most archs store the return address before storing the + * function's local variables. But some archs do this backwards. + */ + if (x > 1) { + memmove(&stack_trace_index[0], &stack_trace_index[1], + sizeof(stack_trace_index[0]) * (x - 1)); + x--; + } +#endif + stack_trace_nr_entries = x; if (task_stack_end_corrupted(current)) { From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.3 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_2 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E630C32750 for ; Fri, 2 Aug 2019 16:11:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1199020449 for ; Fri, 2 Aug 2019 16:11:35 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="nLk4XAbF" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 1199020449 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=goodmis.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To: Message-ID:Subject:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=bIyenXtXZIYJUV00A4R3ZonndVuJfVjaDCYfmZTq0Ss=; b=nLk4XAbFMKOp/t tRoQn5QMBmdtf5zVSZgMblOw36HYOEbY7R8WGJ3vlmBic6AcmM9ftD4RSG3b6GmpYkRPu7ov/k+iS P7uGuchOGFWr5vJwHjlxT5V5mUlNZCy8nUjzqX/COiRlErEc2pIcs6nkA8wOW6kXS5iPtaSz40n12 jKvy2IYvyB/2igb0Lhkucgyu6Bp66kjl82TvkFoVg94xtTbFW+7Ad94HSDpDCXPi6U3mVvs1YRgoV u0EsPejSzwPPE7t/KrsMPYFs0J/yjBas1cxfFB3yLikpyqWz3Y6HNBu+JFI+bVZcLNgOYqMPFpVkt DqsIrWWDWoBrBxQSU+MQ==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1hta9S-0008RO-8C; Fri, 02 Aug 2019 16:11:30 +0000 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1hta9P-0008Qn-0d for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 02 Aug 2019 16:11:28 +0000 Received: from gandalf.local.home (cpe-66-24-58-225.stny.res.rr.com [66.24.58.225]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0F61120449; Fri, 2 Aug 2019 16:11:25 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2019 12:11:24 -0400 From: Steven Rostedt To: Jiping Ma Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] tracing: Function stack size and its name mismatch in arm64 Message-ID: <20190802121124.6b41f26a@gandalf.local.home> In-Reply-To: <20190802120920.3b1f4351@gandalf.local.home> References: <20190802094103.163576-1-jiping.ma2@windriver.com> <20190802112259.0530a648@gandalf.local.home> <20190802120920.3b1f4351@gandalf.local.home> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.3 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20190802_091127_080970_9792E315 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 18.53 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: catalin.marinas@arm.com, will.deacon@arm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com, joel@joelfernandes.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Fri, 2 Aug 2019 12:09:20 -0400 Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Fri, 2 Aug 2019 11:22:59 -0400 > Steven Rostedt wrote: > > > I think you are not explaining the issue correctly. From looking at the > > document, I think what you want to say is that the LR is saved *after* > > the data for the function. Is that correct? If so, then yes, it would > > cause the stack tracing algorithm to be incorrect. > > > > [..] > > > Can someone confirm that this is the real issue? > > Does this patch fix your issue? > Bah, I hit "attach" instead of "insert" (I wondered why it didn't insert). Here's the patch without the attachment. -- Steve diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/ftrace.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/ftrace.h index 5ab5200b2bdc..13a4832cfb00 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/ftrace.h +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/ftrace.h @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@ #define HAVE_FUNCTION_GRAPH_FP_TEST #define MCOUNT_ADDR ((unsigned long)_mcount) #define MCOUNT_INSN_SIZE AARCH64_INSN_SIZE +#define ARCH_RET_ADDR_AFTER_LOCAL_VARS 1 #ifndef __ASSEMBLY__ #include diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_stack.c b/kernel/trace/trace_stack.c index 5d16f73898db..050c6bd9beac 100644 --- a/kernel/trace/trace_stack.c +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_stack.c @@ -158,6 +158,18 @@ static void check_stack(unsigned long ip, unsigned long *stack) i++; } +#ifdef ARCH_RET_ADDR_AFTER_LOCAL_VARS + /* + * Most archs store the return address before storing the + * function's local variables. But some archs do this backwards. + */ + if (x > 1) { + memmove(&stack_trace_index[0], &stack_trace_index[1], + sizeof(stack_trace_index[0]) * (x - 1)); + x--; + } +#endif + stack_trace_nr_entries = x; if (task_stack_end_corrupted(current)) { _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel