From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@mellanox.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
Bharata B Rao <bharata@linux.ibm.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org" <linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org>
Subject: Re: add a not device managed memremap_pages v2
Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2019 12:34:01 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190816123356.GE5412@mellanox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190816065434.2129-1-hch@lst.de>
On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 08:54:30AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Hi Dan and Jason,
>
> Bharata has been working on secure page management for kvmppc guests,
> and one I thing I noticed is that he had to fake up a struct device
> just so that it could be passed to the devm_memremap_pages
> instrastructure for device private memory.
>
> This series adds non-device managed versions of the
> devm_request_free_mem_region and devm_memremap_pages functions for
> his use case.
>
> Changes since v1:
> - don't overload devm_request_free_mem_region
> - export the memremap_pages and munmap_pages as kvmppc can be a module
What tree do we want this to go through? Dan are you running a pgmap
tree still? Do we know of any conflicts?
Thanks,
Jason
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-08-16 12:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-08-16 6:54 add a not device managed memremap_pages v2 Christoph Hellwig
2019-08-16 6:54 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-08-16 6:54 ` [PATCH 1/4] resource: add a not device managed request_free_mem_region variant Christoph Hellwig
2019-08-16 6:54 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-08-16 21:01 ` Andrew Morton
2019-08-16 21:01 ` Andrew Morton
2019-08-18 9:03 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-08-18 9:03 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-08-16 6:54 ` [PATCH 2/4] memremap: remove the dev field in struct dev_pagemap Christoph Hellwig
2019-08-16 6:54 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-08-16 6:54 ` [PATCH 3/4] memremap: don't use a separate devm action for devmap_managed_enable_get Christoph Hellwig
2019-08-16 6:54 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-08-16 6:54 ` [PATCH 4/4] memremap: provide a not device managed memremap_pages Christoph Hellwig
2019-08-16 6:54 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-08-16 21:00 ` Andrew Morton
2019-08-16 21:00 ` Andrew Morton
2019-08-18 9:04 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-08-18 9:04 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-08-16 10:48 ` add a not device managed memremap_pages v2 Bharata B Rao
2019-08-16 12:34 ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
2019-08-16 12:36 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-08-16 12:40 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-08-16 12:40 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-08-16 23:59 ` Ira Weiny
2019-08-16 23:59 ` Ira Weiny
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190816123356.GE5412@mellanox.com \
--to=jgg@mellanox.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bharata@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.