All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "hch@lst.de" <hch@lst.de>
To: "Verma, Vishal L" <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>
Cc: "linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org" <linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Williams, Dan J" <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
	"hch@lst.de" <hch@lst.de>,
	"david@fromorbit.com" <david@fromorbit.com>,
	"darrick.wong@oracle.com" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: 5.3-rc1 regression with XFS log recovery
Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2019 09:11:28 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190818071128.GA17286@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e49a6a3a244db055995769eb844c281f93e50ab9.camel@intel.com>

On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 08:59:44PM +0000, Verma, Vishal L wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> When running the 'ndctl' unit tests against 5.3-rc kernels, I noticed a
> frequent failure of the 'mmap.sh' test [1][2].
> 
> [1]: https://github.com/pmem/ndctl/blob/master/test/mmap.sh
> [2]: https://github.com/pmem/ndctl/blob/master/test/mmap.c
> 
> But in trying to pare down the test further, I found that I can simply
> reproduce the problem by:
> 
>   mkfs.xfs -f /dev/pmem0
>   mount /dev/pmem0 /mnt/mem
> 
> Where 'pmem0' is a legacy pmem namespace from reserved memory using the
> memmap= command line option. (Specifically, I have this:
> memmap=3G!6G,3G!9G )
> 
> The above mkfs/mount steps don't reproduce the problem a 100% of the
> time, but it does happen on my qemu based setup over 75% of the times.
> 
> The kernel log shows the following when the mount fails:

Is it always that same message?  I'll see if I can reproduce it,
but I won't have that much memory to spare to create fake pmem,
hope this also works with a single device and/or less memory..

  reply	other threads:[~2019-08-18  7:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-08-16 20:59 5.3-rc1 regression with XFS log recovery Verma, Vishal L
2019-08-18  7:11 ` hch [this message]
2019-08-18  7:41   ` hch
2019-08-18 17:34     ` hch
2019-08-19  0:08       ` Dave Chinner
2019-08-19  3:49         ` hch
2019-08-19  4:11           ` hch
2019-08-19  4:22             ` Dave Chinner
2019-08-19  4:29               ` hch
2019-08-19  4:40                 ` hch
2019-08-19  5:31                   ` Dave Chinner
2019-08-20  6:14                     ` hch
2019-08-20  4:41                   ` Dave Chinner
2019-08-20  5:53                     ` hch
2019-08-20  7:44                       ` Dave Chinner
2019-08-20  8:13                       ` Ming Lei
2019-08-20  9:24                         ` Ming Lei
2019-08-20 16:30                           ` Verma, Vishal L
2019-08-20 21:44                           ` Dave Chinner
2019-08-20 22:08                             ` Verma, Vishal L
2019-08-20 23:53                               ` Dave Chinner
2019-08-21  2:19                               ` Ming Lei
2019-08-21  1:56                             ` Ming Lei
2019-08-19  4:15           ` Dave Chinner
2019-08-19 17:19       ` Verma, Vishal L
2019-08-21  0:26       ` Dave Chinner
2019-08-21  0:44         ` hch
2019-08-21  1:08           ` Dave Chinner
2019-08-21  1:56             ` Verma, Vishal L
2019-08-21  6:15               ` Dave Chinner
2019-08-26 17:32       ` Verma, Vishal L

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190818071128.GA17286@lst.de \
    --to=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.