From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18D64C3A589 for ; Sun, 18 Aug 2019 17:47:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E68A82086C for ; Sun, 18 Aug 2019 17:47:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726947AbfHRRrF (ORCPT ); Sun, 18 Aug 2019 13:47:05 -0400 Received: from outgoing-auth-1.mit.edu ([18.9.28.11]:50094 "EHLO outgoing.mit.edu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726005AbfHRRrE (ORCPT ); Sun, 18 Aug 2019 13:47:04 -0400 Received: from callcc.thunk.org ([12.235.16.3]) (authenticated bits=0) (User authenticated as tytso@ATHENA.MIT.EDU) by outgoing.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.4) with ESMTP id x7IHkMSP023499 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Sun, 18 Aug 2019 13:46:23 -0400 Received: by callcc.thunk.org (Postfix, from userid 15806) id D0B194218EF; Sun, 18 Aug 2019 13:46:21 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2019 13:46:21 -0400 From: "Theodore Y. Ts'o" To: Richard Weinberger Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , Gao Xiang , Jan Kara , Chao Yu , Dave Chinner , David Sterba , Miao Xie , devel , Stephen Rothwell , Darrick , Christoph Hellwig , Amir Goldstein , linux-erofs , Al Viro , Jaegeuk Kim , linux-kernel , Li Guifu , Fang Wei , Pavel Machek , linux-fsdevel , Andrew Morton , torvalds Subject: Re: [PATCH] erofs: move erofs out of staging Message-ID: <20190818174621.GB12940@mit.edu> Mail-Followup-To: "Theodore Y. Ts'o" , Richard Weinberger , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Gao Xiang , Jan Kara , Chao Yu , Dave Chinner , David Sterba , Miao Xie , devel , Stephen Rothwell , Darrick , Christoph Hellwig , Amir Goldstein , linux-erofs , Al Viro , Jaegeuk Kim , linux-kernel , Li Guifu , Fang Wei , Pavel Machek , linux-fsdevel , Andrew Morton , torvalds References: <20190817082313.21040-1-hsiangkao@aol.com> <20190817233843.GA16991@hsiangkao-HP-ZHAN-66-Pro-G1> <1405781266.69008.1566116210649.JavaMail.zimbra@nod.at> <20190818084521.GA17909@hsiangkao-HP-ZHAN-66-Pro-G1> <1133002215.69049.1566119033047.JavaMail.zimbra@nod.at> <20190818090949.GA30276@kroah.com> <790210571.69061.1566120073465.JavaMail.zimbra@nod.at> <20190818151154.GA32157@mit.edu> <1897345637.69314.1566148000847.JavaMail.zimbra@nod.at> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1897345637.69314.1566148000847.JavaMail.zimbra@nod.at> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Aug 18, 2019 at 07:06:40PM +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote: > > So holding a file system like EROFS to a higher standard than say, > > ext4, xfs, or btrfs hardly seems fair. > > Nobody claimed that. Pointing out that erofs has issues in this area when Gao Xiang is asking if erofs can be moved out of staging and join the "official clubhouse" of file systems could certainly be reasonable interpreted as such. Reporting such vulnerablities are a good thing, and hopefully all file system maintainers will welcome them. Doing them on a e-mail thread about promoting out of erofs is certainly going to lead to inferences of a double standard. Cheers, - Ted From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: tytso@mit.edu (Theodore Y. Ts'o) Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2019 13:46:21 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] erofs: move erofs out of staging In-Reply-To: <1897345637.69314.1566148000847.JavaMail.zimbra@nod.at> References: <20190817082313.21040-1-hsiangkao@aol.com> <20190817233843.GA16991@hsiangkao-HP-ZHAN-66-Pro-G1> <1405781266.69008.1566116210649.JavaMail.zimbra@nod.at> <20190818084521.GA17909@hsiangkao-HP-ZHAN-66-Pro-G1> <1133002215.69049.1566119033047.JavaMail.zimbra@nod.at> <20190818090949.GA30276@kroah.com> <790210571.69061.1566120073465.JavaMail.zimbra@nod.at> <20190818151154.GA32157@mit.edu> <1897345637.69314.1566148000847.JavaMail.zimbra@nod.at> Message-ID: <20190818174621.GB12940@mit.edu> List-Id: Linux Driver Project Developer List On Sun, Aug 18, 2019@07:06:40PM +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote: > > So holding a file system like EROFS to a higher standard than say, > > ext4, xfs, or btrfs hardly seems fair. > > Nobody claimed that. Pointing out that erofs has issues in this area when Gao Xiang is asking if erofs can be moved out of staging and join the "official clubhouse" of file systems could certainly be reasonable interpreted as such. Reporting such vulnerablities are a good thing, and hopefully all file system maintainers will welcome them. Doing them on a e-mail thread about promoting out of erofs is certainly going to lead to inferences of a double standard. Cheers, - Ted