From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89114C3A59F for ; Sun, 18 Aug 2019 18:32:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FD372086C for ; Sun, 18 Aug 2019 18:32:08 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=gmx.net header.i=@gmx.net header.b="W59CkNbL" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726999AbfHRScH (ORCPT ); Sun, 18 Aug 2019 14:32:07 -0400 Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.15]:39519 "EHLO mout.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726005AbfHRScH (ORCPT ); Sun, 18 Aug 2019 14:32:07 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1566153082; bh=JnSOVaSr8ZMfWjAXv4Mm3x6HT+bnyfuADTLNgCCBU3s=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=W59CkNbLUNAjJ7USev9l7fXD+Z+K9BfIaTpUBh7Bj7qK4HON80gQ640oPrBB1Dc61 VpvvPPyDQBV82IyxCfz75zyOi1ZMLCONioEc+9b8g2UH8PnWDsEmsM/43SZxw1YdrQ x1kHIO6Tcg+ZxTY69RBfT9sYSIdKsCj6Cy9b/k7k= X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c Received: from hsiangkao-HP-ZHAN-66-Pro-G1 ([115.197.242.96]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx003 [212.227.17.184]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0Lb5GD-1iepNI0Ctd-00kf6J; Sun, 18 Aug 2019 20:31:22 +0200 Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2019 02:31:05 +0800 From: Gao Xiang To: Richard Weinberger Cc: tytso , Jan Kara , Amir Goldstein , Dave Chinner , linux-kernel , Miao Xie , devel , Stephen Rothwell , Darrick , Christoph Hellwig , torvalds , Al Viro , Jaegeuk Kim , Greg Kroah-Hartman , David Sterba , Pavel Machek , linux-fsdevel , Andrew Morton , linux-erofs Subject: Re: [PATCH] erofs: move erofs out of staging Message-ID: <20190818183104.GB1617@hsiangkao-HP-ZHAN-66-Pro-G1> References: <20190817082313.21040-1-hsiangkao@aol.com> <20190818084521.GA17909@hsiangkao-HP-ZHAN-66-Pro-G1> <1133002215.69049.1566119033047.JavaMail.zimbra@nod.at> <20190818090949.GA30276@kroah.com> <790210571.69061.1566120073465.JavaMail.zimbra@nod.at> <20190818151154.GA32157@mit.edu> <1897345637.69314.1566148000847.JavaMail.zimbra@nod.at> <20190818174621.GB12940@mit.edu> <538856932.69442.1566151228866.JavaMail.zimbra@nod.at> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable In-Reply-To: <538856932.69442.1566151228866.JavaMail.zimbra@nod.at> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:H+NFCf0wlqRcqkLlPam7c5tw+KObwz8nlqwhdtnkWhSReB61qKl F1fRmaMOcEwjjy47KN8sdZ1Nk/+0402ISuwlyXPlwfJQstQFGVihGeyZdqeQJasAygKYq2Z xcEfL1e/z/LZK01QHjhFsQhPIhw+Hojr493apR3fT3uYUv6ggEieajZZwysC9q/TQOFjLtk Waa/H1RdohVdkujV0ShNw== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:YKP+DUme9FE=:EdYyDDF+QXnnkddLceeaol lUp/Y5zJTjISBcJe7r4rAmC2303gSu3GOI3nXQ56gfGojcO+oL2dX2+sWykSAf/3Ft76t053h CKInXxdZ4EX5YnPypdPOn3PlIhn2vW/wvm5j1lF2gXvqzEWXgh0D0zlZqrW2YIMW2Y56jFHRO p7rxicoAiT6jER70sDhOunPny/X/D9ft+AoWkNFiG8RB/fGURNG5HpLAAruteq3JyE8Off8Q6 DhL8fy6lMG4rShVavuZcOc82Q+CUc563Lf1lstLzmOEJSuBNuBNshWRTIe4Y7XNrNdhwSqmQF /9KDo4ewO6j9JTudL0s/UJ7qMqEROqaCYhfSlWOyQgvWyR7xL+tqfq2ZziFRSwwNhUQOL7ONh fd4fiTIm7/EqNg5/+Tl4Klb81v1DiWjB8IWJFPwxgPsT54orXmpbh1MMIAHlk8MlYd25Dpk1F fbKOd5Bg/wHcFjVgs5m3jyRj9Hqy7gLJ0F9pre1hfSnX1U4tuKYeFxEdr1dtC7YbAD3Yeqf8X LBsqecZeZMyI1xEg5PSTLI+K14rZ15HsfJZ/HUMPgUipgECHHcFdDQzss4Sy6tqBIP3KAZTHt xQ8lTnUWPlH6Sszn98kcQpSZqWnrg4DQar4XdID3jFdjrneKpMPEYCWwBQ6MCl46G2bmMLtP7 6pDuPNdIYeiMy2nrs+rPOYOAVDZotDOv6dEBwinn24Spnmf/PPL+9S+XYD9L0pfdI7aQOXL6T F0gTIOlPp6NvepwXiLU/oCqW2+7BIzHuuILKKZTnECF1PCS8mC7Ekt/U+MrzgOz8rdM/N65vR ynRwLoZ3qFpgvW6NM7tqKMTnBdlnH2jaWoKaVhn3Wx2W4C01zHwWL/4saWPEiBjfNcbHPnHs5 rntaFgJZb2iRpcTwxeg+5aZhghQMPHR5NxrUjDm01xzSGun1gdbyD+Yy6Mpi3d1+g5nwHExwZ DISTC61UjNkdRD5a5Tqrulvis/0DuT64pa5+GPKF31L7h298i61XJHYPD0kH+J0+Re1qNiVMl tU/X64eDZh1jGufmquTCEy1VwuarL3sKid5KyuI3sbo61IivGz2yzovTntrpPEw5svjpVUtKz lt5QNwKxE1gbzvR1crZNH/8jpf+RkE/RMwfsN23afEwBdLjh0DicfVLPA== Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Richard, On Sun, Aug 18, 2019 at 08:00:28PM +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote: > ----- Urspr=FCngliche Mail ----- > > Von: "tytso" > > An: "richard" > > CC: "Greg Kroah-Hartman" , "Gao Xiang" , "Jan Kara" , "Chao > > Yu" , "Dave Chinner" , "David= Sterba" , "Miao Xie" > > , "devel" , "Stephen R= othwell" , "Darrick" > > , "Christoph Hellwig" , "A= mir Goldstein" , > > "linux-erofs" , "Al Viro" , "Jaegeuk Kim" , > > "linux-kernel" , "Li Guifu" , "Fang Wei" , > > "Pavel Machek" , "linux-fsdevel" , "Andrew Morton" > > , "torvalds" > > Gesendet: Sonntag, 18. August 2019 19:46:21 > > Betreff: Re: [PATCH] erofs: move erofs out of staging > > > On Sun, Aug 18, 2019 at 07:06:40PM +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote: > >> > So holding a file system like EROFS to a higher standard than say, > >> > ext4, xfs, or btrfs hardly seems fair. > >> > >> Nobody claimed that. > > > > Pointing out that erofs has issues in this area when Gao Xiang is > > asking if erofs can be moved out of staging and join the "official > > clubhouse" of file systems could certainly be reasonable interpreted > > as such. Reporting such vulnerablities are a good thing, and > > hopefully all file system maintainers will welcome them. Doing them > > on a e-mail thread about promoting out of erofs is certainly going to > > lead to inferences of a double standard. > > Well, this was not at all my intention. > erofs raised my attention and instead of wasting a new thread > I answered here and reported what I found while looking at it. > That's all. Thank you very much, EROFS finally has some real concern after a quite long time. I will do that but I really want to upstream for 5.4LTS and hope to get your further report. Thanks, Gao Xiang > > Thanks, > //richard From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: hsiangkao@gmx.com (Gao Xiang) Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2019 02:31:05 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] erofs: move erofs out of staging In-Reply-To: <538856932.69442.1566151228866.JavaMail.zimbra@nod.at> References: <20190817082313.21040-1-hsiangkao@aol.com> <20190818084521.GA17909@hsiangkao-HP-ZHAN-66-Pro-G1> <1133002215.69049.1566119033047.JavaMail.zimbra@nod.at> <20190818090949.GA30276@kroah.com> <790210571.69061.1566120073465.JavaMail.zimbra@nod.at> <20190818151154.GA32157@mit.edu> <1897345637.69314.1566148000847.JavaMail.zimbra@nod.at> <20190818174621.GB12940@mit.edu> <538856932.69442.1566151228866.JavaMail.zimbra@nod.at> Message-ID: <20190818183104.GB1617@hsiangkao-HP-ZHAN-66-Pro-G1> List-Id: Linux Driver Project Developer List Hi Richard, On Sun, Aug 18, 2019@08:00:28PM +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote: > ----- Urspr?ngliche Mail ----- > > Von: "tytso" > > An: "richard" > > CC: "Greg Kroah-Hartman" , "Gao Xiang" , "Jan Kara" , "Chao > > Yu" , "Dave Chinner" , "David Sterba" , "Miao Xie" > > , "devel" , "Stephen Rothwell" , "Darrick" > > , "Christoph Hellwig" , "Amir Goldstein" , > > "linux-erofs" , "Al Viro" , "Jaegeuk Kim" , > > "linux-kernel" , "Li Guifu" , "Fang Wei" , > > "Pavel Machek" , "linux-fsdevel" , "Andrew Morton" > > , "torvalds" > > Gesendet: Sonntag, 18. August 2019 19:46:21 > > Betreff: Re: [PATCH] erofs: move erofs out of staging > > > On Sun, Aug 18, 2019@07:06:40PM +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote: > >> > So holding a file system like EROFS to a higher standard than say, > >> > ext4, xfs, or btrfs hardly seems fair. > >> > >> Nobody claimed that. > > > > Pointing out that erofs has issues in this area when Gao Xiang is > > asking if erofs can be moved out of staging and join the "official > > clubhouse" of file systems could certainly be reasonable interpreted > > as such. Reporting such vulnerablities are a good thing, and > > hopefully all file system maintainers will welcome them. Doing them > > on a e-mail thread about promoting out of erofs is certainly going to > > lead to inferences of a double standard. > > Well, this was not at all my intention. > erofs raised my attention and instead of wasting a new thread > I answered here and reported what I found while looking at it. > That's all. Thank you very much, EROFS finally has some real concern after a quite long time. I will do that but I really want to upstream for 5.4LTS and hope to get your further report. Thanks, Gao Xiang > > Thanks, > //richard