From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD67AC3A59B for ; Mon, 19 Aug 2019 04:29:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92B4221773 for ; Mon, 19 Aug 2019 04:29:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1725790AbfHSE3J (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Aug 2019 00:29:09 -0400 Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:44213 "EHLO verein.lst.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725536AbfHSE3I (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Aug 2019 00:29:08 -0400 Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id A4A0768B02; Mon, 19 Aug 2019 06:29:05 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2019 06:29:05 +0200 From: "hch@lst.de" To: Dave Chinner Cc: "hch@lst.de" , "Verma, Vishal L" , "linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org" , "Williams, Dan J" , "darrick.wong@oracle.com" Subject: Re: 5.3-rc1 regression with XFS log recovery Message-ID: <20190819042905.GA15613@lst.de> References: <20190818071128.GA17286@lst.de> <20190818074140.GA18648@lst.de> <20190818173426.GA32311@lst.de> <20190819000831.GX6129@dread.disaster.area> <20190819034948.GA14261@lst.de> <20190819041132.GA14492@lst.de> <20190819042259.GZ6129@dread.disaster.area> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190819042259.GZ6129@dread.disaster.area> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Sender: linux-xfs-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 02:22:59PM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote: > That implies a kmalloc heap issue. > > Oh, is memory poisoning or something that modifies the alignment of > slabs turned on? > > i.e. 4k/8k allocations from the kmalloc heap slabs might not be > appropriately aligned for IO, similar to the problems we have with > the xen blk driver? That is what I suspect, and as you can see in the attached config I usually run with slab debuggig on.