From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1D97C3A589 for ; Tue, 20 Aug 2019 06:14:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCB8D206DD for ; Tue, 20 Aug 2019 06:14:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729072AbfHTGOb (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Aug 2019 02:14:31 -0400 Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:53920 "EHLO verein.lst.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728960AbfHTGOb (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Aug 2019 02:14:31 -0400 Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id 3D98168B05; Tue, 20 Aug 2019 08:14:27 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2019 08:14:26 +0200 From: "hch@lst.de" To: Dave Chinner Cc: "hch@lst.de" , "Verma, Vishal L" , "linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org" , "Williams, Dan J" , "darrick.wong@oracle.com" Subject: Re: 5.3-rc1 regression with XFS log recovery Message-ID: <20190820061426.GA28042@lst.de> References: <20190818071128.GA17286@lst.de> <20190818074140.GA18648@lst.de> <20190818173426.GA32311@lst.de> <20190819000831.GX6129@dread.disaster.area> <20190819034948.GA14261@lst.de> <20190819041132.GA14492@lst.de> <20190819042259.GZ6129@dread.disaster.area> <20190819042905.GA15613@lst.de> <20190819044012.GA15800@lst.de> <20190819053122.GK7777@dread.disaster.area> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190819053122.GK7777@dread.disaster.area> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Sender: linux-xfs-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 03:31:22PM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote: > But I'm not so sure that's all there is to it. I turned KASAN on and > it works for the first few mkfs/mount cycles, then a mount basically > pegs a CPU and it's spending most of it's time inside KASAN > accouting code like this: Did that KASAN spat lead anywhere? I've done some KASAN runs now and I've not seen anything yet after running mkfs/mount/umount in a loop.