All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Cc: sandeen@sandeen.net, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] xfs_scrub: fix nr_dirs accounting problems
Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2019 18:15:53 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190904081553.GD1119@dread.disaster.area> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <156685448524.2840069.582566075645213965.stgit@magnolia>

On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 02:21:25PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> From: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
> 
> When we're scanning the directory tree, we bump nr_dirs every time we
> think we're going to queue a new directory to process, and we decrement
> it every time we're finished doing something with a directory
> (successful or not).  We forgot to undo a counter increment when
> workqueue_add fails, so refactor the code into helpers and call them
> as necessary for correct operation.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
> ---
>  scrub/vfs.c |   38 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
>  1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 
> 
> diff --git a/scrub/vfs.c b/scrub/vfs.c
> index ea2866d9..b358ab4a 100644
> --- a/scrub/vfs.c
> +++ b/scrub/vfs.c
> @@ -45,6 +45,32 @@ struct scan_fs_tree_dir {
>  
>  static void scan_fs_dir(struct workqueue *wq, xfs_agnumber_t agno, void *arg);
>  
> +/* Increment the number of directories that are queued for processing. */
> +static void
> +inc_nr_dirs(
> +	struct scan_fs_tree	*sft)
> +{
> +	pthread_mutex_lock(&sft->lock);
> +	sft->nr_dirs++;
> +	pthread_mutex_unlock(&sft->lock);
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Decrement the number of directories that are queued for processing and if
> + * we ran out of dirs to process, wake up anyone who was waiting for processing
> + * to finish.
> + */
> +static void
> +dec_nr_dirs(
> +	struct scan_fs_tree	*sft)
> +{
> +	pthread_mutex_lock(&sft->lock);
> +	sft->nr_dirs--;
> +	if (sft->nr_dirs == 0)
> +		pthread_cond_signal(&sft->wakeup);
> +	pthread_mutex_unlock(&sft->lock);
> +}
> +
>  /* Queue a directory for scanning. */
>  static bool
>  queue_subdir(
> @@ -73,11 +99,10 @@ queue_subdir(
>  	new_sftd->sft = sft;
>  	new_sftd->rootdir = is_rootdir;
>  
> -	pthread_mutex_lock(&sft->lock);
> -	sft->nr_dirs++;
> -	pthread_mutex_unlock(&sft->lock);
> +	inc_nr_dirs(sft);
>  	error = workqueue_add(wq, scan_fs_dir, 0, new_sftd);
>  	if (error) {
> +		dec_nr_dirs(sft);
>  		str_info(ctx, ctx->mntpoint,
>  _("Could not queue subdirectory scan work."));
>  		return false;

Ok, that's the bug fix for the previous patch. Potentially should be
a separate patch, but right now there is so much outstanding that I
don't think it's worthwhile to respin the series just to fix that.

Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com

  reply	other threads:[~2019-09-04  8:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-08-26 21:21 [PATCH 0/3] xfs_scrub: fix bugs in vfs tree walk code Darrick J. Wong
2019-08-26 21:21 ` [PATCH 1/3] xfs_scrub: refactor queueing of subdir scan work item Darrick J. Wong
2019-09-04  8:12   ` Dave Chinner
2019-09-04 16:37     ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-08-26 21:21 ` [PATCH 2/3] xfs_scrub: fix nr_dirs accounting problems Darrick J. Wong
2019-09-04  8:15   ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2019-08-26 21:21 ` [PATCH 3/3] xfs_scrub: remove unnecessary wakeup wait in scan_fs_tree Darrick J. Wong
2019-09-04  8:20   ` Dave Chinner
2019-09-06  3:33 [PATCH 0/3] xfs_scrub: fix bugs in vfs tree walk code Darrick J. Wong
2019-09-06  3:34 ` [PATCH 2/3] xfs_scrub: fix nr_dirs accounting problems Darrick J. Wong
2019-09-25 21:31 [PATCH 0/3] xfs_scrub: fix bugs in vfs tree walk code Darrick J. Wong
2019-09-25 21:31 ` [PATCH 2/3] xfs_scrub: fix nr_dirs accounting problems Darrick J. Wong

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190904081553.GD1119@dread.disaster.area \
    --to=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sandeen@sandeen.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.