From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jason Gunthorpe Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Revert and rework on the metadata accelreation Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2019 13:59:10 +0000 Message-ID: <20190905135907.GB6011__11323.6388818891$1567691971$gmane$org@mellanox.com> References: <20190905122736.19768-1-jasowang@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20190905122736.19768-1-jasowang@redhat.com> Content-Language: en-US Content-ID: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Errors-To: virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org To: Jason Wang Cc: "aarcange@redhat.com" , "kvm@vger.kernel.org" , "mst@redhat.com" , "netdev@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org" , "linux-mm@kvack.org" , "jglisse@redhat.com" List-Id: virtualization@lists.linuxfoundation.org On Thu, Sep 05, 2019 at 08:27:34PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > Hi: > > Per request from Michael and Jason, the metadata accelreation is > reverted in this version and rework in next version. > > Please review. > > Thanks > > Jason Wang (2): > Revert "vhost: access vq metadata through kernel virtual address" > vhost: re-introducing metadata acceleration through kernel virtual > address There are a bunch of patches in the queue already that will help vhost, and I a working on one for next cycle that will help alot more too. I think you should apply the revert this cycle and rebase the other patch for next.. Jason