From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.5 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED, DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6132C3A5A2 for ; Sat, 21 Sep 2019 00:24:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ml01.01.org (ml01.01.org [198.145.21.10]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7A28B217F9 for ; Sat, 21 Sep 2019 00:24:51 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com header.i=@google.com header.b="gBA2/p13" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 7A28B217F9 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=reject dis=none) header.from=google.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-nvdimm-bounces@lists.01.org Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ml01.01.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 061B6202EDBAB; Fri, 20 Sep 2019 17:27:42 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: Pass (sender SPF authorized) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::84a; helo=mail-qt1-x84a.google.com; envelope-from=3i16fxq4kdfat9w5vs5z0yy05ay66y3w.u64305cf-5dv04430aba.ij.69y@flex--brendanhiggins.bounces.google.com; receiver=linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org Received: from mail-qt1-x84a.google.com (mail-qt1-x84a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::84a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ml01.01.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2AAC6202EDBA2 for ; Fri, 20 Sep 2019 17:27:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-qt1-x84a.google.com with SMTP id o34so10090590qtf.22 for ; Fri, 20 Sep 2019 17:24:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=date:message-id:mime-version:subject:from:to:cc; bh=nb7QxHXj+SKvjsJLG8FWioDhlMnWN+bRLwlVtN25RL8=; b=gBA2/p13VviwFX4KcGj3wi73zswgh9stq+u0+VIVmsQc5JjIHMEAc8dxixhA5Rl+C3 3uN9VQFxr8hIUCrY4o5HmaFJmwEZnNosUkMmsdxptY6kSkTRMPReA+DGLs5E4S0eKzMb wxzegoEDbhr1qTO0W9rClb06XAlrKyS+1nRcMn00URrZxhtKVvqNGaVUmf5l45RflXbu api8zdcu39O2cGMSnmhZ8WwwXzUwnyWjqJ93u7qNLGNUqBTnR6n+wjy0GTxPZLA6Tksq vc03vGL3W4/BQKCds3KzP7hRH5zJsvNdcNRfMW9REt7lHDUwBIQvByxBpEgtHGWEvZZv wJAw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:message-id:mime-version:subject:from:to:cc; bh=nb7QxHXj+SKvjsJLG8FWioDhlMnWN+bRLwlVtN25RL8=; b=Th8khOOZyj4H2WiUo4oXd++8MIVKPtiRHQ0wfhBC51UBC+ZCQpYVRR5nsREyGEMyeb LXVXmxXZhWso7utf0qlmnCHWQo78wdzGwRMt2+GxHbhPLKdMkrochFmkv50O7zNWI/dF wp9N6rz28SSqz76z99zCZZAWmS+Kv9r8hor5HHzusLhKgjl4oXLHwk7KK9CGljub5tQL /9N/o6xRjYhKci+WwMKw9AjWOfuYHxePcfOxq/5RMw6hJ4JuvP+6xiwOthBMcDloctOD J06jiL968QQ9KTNDwpfnA0Zh3kHYr0BPLzIepf3Adj80ee7REbgW51u+Lg+PnE+H2tG9 9r5A== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUbPp4hx0n6FtpdFZuRobyFygmJPsN61foh/6FyJ0qSOvr+SmDV NorI3iQ+8ztiubqOlZtPBh8Zie3HU6hq2gHKWrpDHg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqytMR8IZXABl+f3jYgBOchzLzV2fU9kRlUfaLFAk4s8Ys3CTvTqt33JWkrWAeywlxKZdNmAWieZg+uzSvfi8E7soQ== X-Received: by 2002:a65:5543:: with SMTP id t3mr17639051pgr.242.1569021579027; Fri, 20 Sep 2019 16:19:39 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2019 16:19:04 -0700 Message-Id: <20190920231923.141900-1-brendanhiggins@google.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.23.0.351.gc4317032e6-goog Subject: [PATCH v16 00/19] kunit: introduce KUnit, the Linux kernel unit testing framework From: Brendan Higgins To: frowand.list@gmail.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, jpoimboe@redhat.com, keescook@google.com, kieran.bingham@ideasonboard.com, mcgrof@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org, robh@kernel.org, sboyd@kernel.org, shuah@kernel.org, tytso@mit.edu, yamada.masahiro@socionext.com X-BeenThere: linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Linux-nvdimm developer list." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: pmladek@suse.com, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, amir73il@gmail.com, Brendan Higgins , dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, Alexander.Levin@microsoft.com, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org, khilman@baylibre.com, knut.omang@oracle.com, wfg@linux.intel.com, joel@jms.id.au, rientjes@google.com, jdike@addtoit.com, dan.carpenter@oracle.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org, Tim.Bird@sony.com, linux-um@lists.infradead.org, rostedt@goodmis.org, julia.lawall@lip6.fr, kunit-dev@googlegroups.com, richard@nod.at, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, rdunlap@infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, daniel@ffwll.ch, mpe@ellerman.id.au, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: linux-nvdimm-bounces@lists.01.org Sender: "Linux-nvdimm" ## TL;DR This revision addresses comments from Linus[1] and Randy[2], by moving top level `kunit/` directory to `lib/kunit/` and likewise moves top level Kconfig entry under lib/Kconfig.debug, so the KUnit submenu now shows up under the "Kernel Hacking" menu. As a consequence of this, I rewrote patch 06/18 (kbuild: enable building KUnit), and now needs to be re-acked/reviewed. ## Background This patch set proposes KUnit, a lightweight unit testing and mocking framework for the Linux kernel. Unlike Autotest and kselftest, KUnit is a true unit testing framework; it does not require installing the kernel on a test machine or in a VM (however, KUnit still allows you to run tests on test machines or in VMs if you want[3]) and does not require tests to be written in userspace running on a host kernel. Additionally, KUnit is fast: From invocation to completion KUnit can run several dozen tests in about a second. Currently, the entire KUnit test suite for KUnit runs in under a second from the initial invocation (build time excluded). KUnit is heavily inspired by JUnit, Python's unittest.mock, and Googletest/Googlemock for C++. KUnit provides facilities for defining unit test cases, grouping related test cases into test suites, providing common infrastructure for running tests, mocking, spying, and much more. ### What's so special about unit testing? A unit test is supposed to test a single unit of code in isolation, hence the name. There should be no dependencies outside the control of the test; this means no external dependencies, which makes tests orders of magnitudes faster. Likewise, since there are no external dependencies, there are no hoops to jump through to run the tests. Additionally, this makes unit tests deterministic: a failing unit test always indicates a problem. Finally, because unit tests necessarily have finer granularity, they are able to test all code paths easily solving the classic problem of difficulty in exercising error handling code. ### Is KUnit trying to replace other testing frameworks for the kernel? No. Most existing tests for the Linux kernel are end-to-end tests, which have their place. A well tested system has lots of unit tests, a reasonable number of integration tests, and some end-to-end tests. KUnit is just trying to address the unit test space which is currently not being addressed. ### More information on KUnit There is a bunch of documentation near the end of this patch set that describes how to use KUnit and best practices for writing unit tests. For convenience I am hosting the compiled docs here[4]. Additionally for convenience, I have applied these patches to a branch[5]. The repo may be cloned with: git clone https://kunit.googlesource.com/linux This patchset is on the kunit/initial/v5.3/v16 branch. [1] https://www.lkml.org/lkml/2019/9/20/696 [2] https://www.lkml.org/lkml/2019/9/20/738 [3] https://google.github.io/kunit-docs/third_party/kernel/docs/usage.html#kunit-on-non-uml-architectures [4] https://google.github.io/kunit-docs/third_party/kernel/docs/ [5] https://kunit.googlesource.com/linux/+/kunit/initial/v5.3/v16 --- Avinash Kondareddy (1): kunit: test: add tests for KUnit managed resources Brendan Higgins (16): kunit: test: add KUnit test runner core kunit: test: add test resource management API kunit: test: add string_stream a std::stream like string builder kunit: test: add assertion printing library kunit: test: add the concept of expectations lib: enable building KUnit in lib/ kunit: test: add initial tests objtool: add kunit_try_catch_throw to the noreturn list kunit: test: add support for test abort kunit: test: add tests for kunit test abort kunit: test: add the concept of assertions kunit: defconfig: add defconfigs for building KUnit tests Documentation: kunit: add documentation for KUnit MAINTAINERS: add entry for KUnit the unit testing framework MAINTAINERS: add proc sysctl KUnit test to PROC SYSCTL section kunit: fix failure to build without printk Felix Guo (1): kunit: tool: add Python wrappers for running KUnit tests Iurii Zaikin (1): kernel/sysctl-test: Add null pointer test for sysctl.c:proc_dointvec() Documentation/dev-tools/index.rst | 1 + Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/api/index.rst | 16 + Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/api/test.rst | 11 + Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/faq.rst | 62 + Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/index.rst | 79 + Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/start.rst | 180 ++ Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/usage.rst | 576 +++++++ MAINTAINERS | 13 + arch/um/configs/kunit_defconfig | 3 + include/kunit/assert.h | 356 ++++ include/kunit/string-stream.h | 51 + include/kunit/test.h | 1490 +++++++++++++++++ include/kunit/try-catch.h | 75 + kernel/Makefile | 2 + kernel/sysctl-test.c | 392 +++++ lib/Kconfig.debug | 13 + lib/Makefile | 2 + lib/kunit/Kconfig | 38 + lib/kunit/Makefile | 9 + lib/kunit/assert.c | 141 ++ lib/kunit/example-test.c | 88 + lib/kunit/string-stream-test.c | 52 + lib/kunit/string-stream.c | 217 +++ lib/kunit/test-test.c | 331 ++++ lib/kunit/test.c | 478 ++++++ lib/kunit/try-catch.c | 118 ++ tools/objtool/check.c | 1 + tools/testing/kunit/.gitignore | 3 + tools/testing/kunit/configs/all_tests.config | 3 + tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py | 136 ++ tools/testing/kunit/kunit_config.py | 66 + tools/testing/kunit/kunit_kernel.py | 149 ++ tools/testing/kunit/kunit_parser.py | 310 ++++ tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py | 206 +++ .../test_is_test_passed-all_passed.log | 32 + .../test_data/test_is_test_passed-crash.log | 69 + .../test_data/test_is_test_passed-failure.log | 36 + .../test_is_test_passed-no_tests_run.log | 75 + .../test_output_isolated_correctly.log | 106 ++ .../test_data/test_read_from_file.kconfig | 17 + 40 files changed, 6003 insertions(+) create mode 100644 Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/api/index.rst create mode 100644 Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/api/test.rst create mode 100644 Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/faq.rst create mode 100644 Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/index.rst create mode 100644 Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/start.rst create mode 100644 Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/usage.rst create mode 100644 arch/um/configs/kunit_defconfig create mode 100644 include/kunit/assert.h create mode 100644 include/kunit/string-stream.h create mode 100644 include/kunit/test.h create mode 100644 include/kunit/try-catch.h create mode 100644 kernel/sysctl-test.c create mode 100644 lib/kunit/Kconfig create mode 100644 lib/kunit/Makefile create mode 100644 lib/kunit/assert.c create mode 100644 lib/kunit/example-test.c create mode 100644 lib/kunit/string-stream-test.c create mode 100644 lib/kunit/string-stream.c create mode 100644 lib/kunit/test-test.c create mode 100644 lib/kunit/test.c create mode 100644 lib/kunit/try-catch.c create mode 100644 tools/testing/kunit/.gitignore create mode 100644 tools/testing/kunit/configs/all_tests.config create mode 100755 tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py create mode 100644 tools/testing/kunit/kunit_config.py create mode 100644 tools/testing/kunit/kunit_kernel.py create mode 100644 tools/testing/kunit/kunit_parser.py create mode 100755 tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py create mode 100644 tools/testing/kunit/test_data/test_is_test_passed-all_passed.log create mode 100644 tools/testing/kunit/test_data/test_is_test_passed-crash.log create mode 100644 tools/testing/kunit/test_data/test_is_test_passed-failure.log create mode 100644 tools/testing/kunit/test_data/test_is_test_passed-no_tests_run.log create mode 100644 tools/testing/kunit/test_data/test_output_isolated_correctly.log create mode 100644 tools/testing/kunit/test_data/test_read_from_file.kconfig -- 2.23.0.351.gc4317032e6-goog _______________________________________________ Linux-nvdimm mailing list Linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvdimm From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-11.4 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_MED,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_GIT,USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1443EC3A5A2 for ; Fri, 20 Sep 2019 23:19:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB8AA2070C for ; Fri, 20 Sep 2019 23:19:41 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com header.i=@google.com header.b="gBA2/p13" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2394035AbfITXTl (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Sep 2019 19:19:41 -0400 Received: from mail-pl1-f201.google.com ([209.85.214.201]:51048 "EHLO mail-pl1-f201.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2393980AbfITXTk (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Sep 2019 19:19:40 -0400 Received: by mail-pl1-f201.google.com with SMTP id x7so5384929plr.17 for ; Fri, 20 Sep 2019 16:19:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=date:message-id:mime-version:subject:from:to:cc; bh=nb7QxHXj+SKvjsJLG8FWioDhlMnWN+bRLwlVtN25RL8=; b=gBA2/p13VviwFX4KcGj3wi73zswgh9stq+u0+VIVmsQc5JjIHMEAc8dxixhA5Rl+C3 3uN9VQFxr8hIUCrY4o5HmaFJmwEZnNosUkMmsdxptY6kSkTRMPReA+DGLs5E4S0eKzMb wxzegoEDbhr1qTO0W9rClb06XAlrKyS+1nRcMn00URrZxhtKVvqNGaVUmf5l45RflXbu api8zdcu39O2cGMSnmhZ8WwwXzUwnyWjqJ93u7qNLGNUqBTnR6n+wjy0GTxPZLA6Tksq vc03vGL3W4/BQKCds3KzP7hRH5zJsvNdcNRfMW9REt7lHDUwBIQvByxBpEgtHGWEvZZv wJAw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:message-id:mime-version:subject:from:to:cc; bh=nb7QxHXj+SKvjsJLG8FWioDhlMnWN+bRLwlVtN25RL8=; b=HzwDU8QOZxDz3yR9xQmY7dsZzKx95RGePpfaAcnIpjd/B5Oes6qR9wIDBDIf+um0m6 NCTKJRj08H2OrTkvUtrREGYdrccPRygvTYe++nbBQyiix35ez2mDT9K82FCDM0KQHC4O D01KxvFpBAJJTh66tvAK2H55xw7pq0Brnbqx/xntCXYakeu4JOApljUbUzQTbDygBV0S jnOhcyEYKVMGbwPw8WkWfzNhEq3/pG0meXhvbZWQTDw9rdQH8CNhFM5FMVOBNU6VwRYt CSgJB0TcJG9GwOUSz1KQRD+5Nl2c8AEnrifsS9Ufq5cQ98lYZaZTBh59dLJs4Mi1T9W/ gefw== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUHLNgzEZ4fEQJoun5fNUEVlUgstZqyY4qPSAebk/3/9/VQCtlR DAHGHJtZb+oo40PSj6T5CATPt2qu0MPHof6NrH4+Fg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqytMR8IZXABl+f3jYgBOchzLzV2fU9kRlUfaLFAk4s8Ys3CTvTqt33JWkrWAeywlxKZdNmAWieZg+uzSvfi8E7soQ== X-Received: by 2002:a65:5543:: with SMTP id t3mr17639051pgr.242.1569021579027; Fri, 20 Sep 2019 16:19:39 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2019 16:19:04 -0700 Message-Id: <20190920231923.141900-1-brendanhiggins@google.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.23.0.351.gc4317032e6-goog Subject: [PATCH v16 00/19] kunit: introduce KUnit, the Linux kernel unit testing framework From: Brendan Higgins To: frowand.list@gmail.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, jpoimboe@redhat.com, keescook@google.com, kieran.bingham@ideasonboard.com, mcgrof@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org, robh@kernel.org, sboyd@kernel.org, shuah@kernel.org, tytso@mit.edu, yamada.masahiro@socionext.com Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, kunit-dev@googlegroups.com, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org, linux-um@lists.infradead.org, Alexander.Levin@microsoft.com, Tim.Bird@sony.com, amir73il@gmail.com, dan.carpenter@oracle.com, daniel@ffwll.ch, jdike@addtoit.com, joel@jms.id.au, julia.lawall@lip6.fr, khilman@baylibre.com, knut.omang@oracle.com, logang@deltatee.com, mpe@ellerman.id.au, pmladek@suse.com, rdunlap@infradead.org, richard@nod.at, rientjes@google.com, rostedt@goodmis.org, wfg@linux.intel.com, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, Brendan Higgins Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org ## TL;DR This revision addresses comments from Linus[1] and Randy[2], by moving top level `kunit/` directory to `lib/kunit/` and likewise moves top level Kconfig entry under lib/Kconfig.debug, so the KUnit submenu now shows up under the "Kernel Hacking" menu. As a consequence of this, I rewrote patch 06/18 (kbuild: enable building KUnit), and now needs to be re-acked/reviewed. ## Background This patch set proposes KUnit, a lightweight unit testing and mocking framework for the Linux kernel. Unlike Autotest and kselftest, KUnit is a true unit testing framework; it does not require installing the kernel on a test machine or in a VM (however, KUnit still allows you to run tests on test machines or in VMs if you want[3]) and does not require tests to be written in userspace running on a host kernel. Additionally, KUnit is fast: From invocation to completion KUnit can run several dozen tests in about a second. Currently, the entire KUnit test suite for KUnit runs in under a second from the initial invocation (build time excluded). KUnit is heavily inspired by JUnit, Python's unittest.mock, and Googletest/Googlemock for C++. KUnit provides facilities for defining unit test cases, grouping related test cases into test suites, providing common infrastructure for running tests, mocking, spying, and much more. ### What's so special about unit testing? A unit test is supposed to test a single unit of code in isolation, hence the name. There should be no dependencies outside the control of the test; this means no external dependencies, which makes tests orders of magnitudes faster. Likewise, since there are no external dependencies, there are no hoops to jump through to run the tests. Additionally, this makes unit tests deterministic: a failing unit test always indicates a problem. Finally, because unit tests necessarily have finer granularity, they are able to test all code paths easily solving the classic problem of difficulty in exercising error handling code. ### Is KUnit trying to replace other testing frameworks for the kernel? No. Most existing tests for the Linux kernel are end-to-end tests, which have their place. A well tested system has lots of unit tests, a reasonable number of integration tests, and some end-to-end tests. KUnit is just trying to address the unit test space which is currently not being addressed. ### More information on KUnit There is a bunch of documentation near the end of this patch set that describes how to use KUnit and best practices for writing unit tests. For convenience I am hosting the compiled docs here[4]. Additionally for convenience, I have applied these patches to a branch[5]. The repo may be cloned with: git clone https://kunit.googlesource.com/linux This patchset is on the kunit/initial/v5.3/v16 branch. [1] https://www.lkml.org/lkml/2019/9/20/696 [2] https://www.lkml.org/lkml/2019/9/20/738 [3] https://google.github.io/kunit-docs/third_party/kernel/docs/usage.html#kunit-on-non-uml-architectures [4] https://google.github.io/kunit-docs/third_party/kernel/docs/ [5] https://kunit.googlesource.com/linux/+/kunit/initial/v5.3/v16 --- Avinash Kondareddy (1): kunit: test: add tests for KUnit managed resources Brendan Higgins (16): kunit: test: add KUnit test runner core kunit: test: add test resource management API kunit: test: add string_stream a std::stream like string builder kunit: test: add assertion printing library kunit: test: add the concept of expectations lib: enable building KUnit in lib/ kunit: test: add initial tests objtool: add kunit_try_catch_throw to the noreturn list kunit: test: add support for test abort kunit: test: add tests for kunit test abort kunit: test: add the concept of assertions kunit: defconfig: add defconfigs for building KUnit tests Documentation: kunit: add documentation for KUnit MAINTAINERS: add entry for KUnit the unit testing framework MAINTAINERS: add proc sysctl KUnit test to PROC SYSCTL section kunit: fix failure to build without printk Felix Guo (1): kunit: tool: add Python wrappers for running KUnit tests Iurii Zaikin (1): kernel/sysctl-test: Add null pointer test for sysctl.c:proc_dointvec() Documentation/dev-tools/index.rst | 1 + Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/api/index.rst | 16 + Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/api/test.rst | 11 + Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/faq.rst | 62 + Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/index.rst | 79 + Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/start.rst | 180 ++ Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/usage.rst | 576 +++++++ MAINTAINERS | 13 + arch/um/configs/kunit_defconfig | 3 + include/kunit/assert.h | 356 ++++ include/kunit/string-stream.h | 51 + include/kunit/test.h | 1490 +++++++++++++++++ include/kunit/try-catch.h | 75 + kernel/Makefile | 2 + kernel/sysctl-test.c | 392 +++++ lib/Kconfig.debug | 13 + lib/Makefile | 2 + lib/kunit/Kconfig | 38 + lib/kunit/Makefile | 9 + lib/kunit/assert.c | 141 ++ lib/kunit/example-test.c | 88 + lib/kunit/string-stream-test.c | 52 + lib/kunit/string-stream.c | 217 +++ lib/kunit/test-test.c | 331 ++++ lib/kunit/test.c | 478 ++++++ lib/kunit/try-catch.c | 118 ++ tools/objtool/check.c | 1 + tools/testing/kunit/.gitignore | 3 + tools/testing/kunit/configs/all_tests.config | 3 + tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py | 136 ++ tools/testing/kunit/kunit_config.py | 66 + tools/testing/kunit/kunit_kernel.py | 149 ++ tools/testing/kunit/kunit_parser.py | 310 ++++ tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py | 206 +++ .../test_is_test_passed-all_passed.log | 32 + .../test_data/test_is_test_passed-crash.log | 69 + .../test_data/test_is_test_passed-failure.log | 36 + .../test_is_test_passed-no_tests_run.log | 75 + .../test_output_isolated_correctly.log | 106 ++ .../test_data/test_read_from_file.kconfig | 17 + 40 files changed, 6003 insertions(+) create mode 100644 Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/api/index.rst create mode 100644 Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/api/test.rst create mode 100644 Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/faq.rst create mode 100644 Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/index.rst create mode 100644 Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/start.rst create mode 100644 Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/usage.rst create mode 100644 arch/um/configs/kunit_defconfig create mode 100644 include/kunit/assert.h create mode 100644 include/kunit/string-stream.h create mode 100644 include/kunit/test.h create mode 100644 include/kunit/try-catch.h create mode 100644 kernel/sysctl-test.c create mode 100644 lib/kunit/Kconfig create mode 100644 lib/kunit/Makefile create mode 100644 lib/kunit/assert.c create mode 100644 lib/kunit/example-test.c create mode 100644 lib/kunit/string-stream-test.c create mode 100644 lib/kunit/string-stream.c create mode 100644 lib/kunit/test-test.c create mode 100644 lib/kunit/test.c create mode 100644 lib/kunit/try-catch.c create mode 100644 tools/testing/kunit/.gitignore create mode 100644 tools/testing/kunit/configs/all_tests.config create mode 100755 tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py create mode 100644 tools/testing/kunit/kunit_config.py create mode 100644 tools/testing/kunit/kunit_kernel.py create mode 100644 tools/testing/kunit/kunit_parser.py create mode 100755 tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py create mode 100644 tools/testing/kunit/test_data/test_is_test_passed-all_passed.log create mode 100644 tools/testing/kunit/test_data/test_is_test_passed-crash.log create mode 100644 tools/testing/kunit/test_data/test_is_test_passed-failure.log create mode 100644 tools/testing/kunit/test_data/test_is_test_passed-no_tests_run.log create mode 100644 tools/testing/kunit/test_data/test_output_isolated_correctly.log create mode 100644 tools/testing/kunit/test_data/test_read_from_file.kconfig -- 2.23.0.351.gc4317032e6-goog From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pf1-x449.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::449]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.2 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1iBSBi-0003BS-Ik for linux-um@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 20 Sep 2019 23:19:44 +0000 Received: by mail-pf1-x449.google.com with SMTP id z13so5748209pfr.15 for ; Fri, 20 Sep 2019 16:19:40 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2019 16:19:04 -0700 Message-Id: <20190920231923.141900-1-brendanhiggins@google.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Subject: [PATCH v16 00/19] kunit: introduce KUnit, the Linux kernel unit testing framework From: Brendan Higgins List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-um" Errors-To: linux-um-bounces+geert=linux-m68k.org@lists.infradead.org To: frowand.list@gmail.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, jpoimboe@redhat.com, keescook@google.com, kieran.bingham@ideasonboard.com, mcgrof@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org, robh@kernel.org, sboyd@kernel.org, shuah@kernel.org, tytso@mit.edu, yamada.masahiro@socionext.com Cc: pmladek@suse.com, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, amir73il@gmail.com, Brendan Higgins , dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, Alexander.Levin@microsoft.com, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org, khilman@baylibre.com, knut.omang@oracle.com, wfg@linux.intel.com, joel@jms.id.au, rientjes@google.com, jdike@addtoit.com, dan.carpenter@oracle.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org, Tim.Bird@sony.com, linux-um@lists.infradead.org, rostedt@goodmis.org, julia.lawall@lip6.fr, kunit-dev@googlegroups.com, richard@nod.at, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, rdunlap@infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, daniel@ffwll.ch, mpe@ellerman.id.au, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, logang@deltatee.com ## TL;DR This revision addresses comments from Linus[1] and Randy[2], by moving top level `kunit/` directory to `lib/kunit/` and likewise moves top level Kconfig entry under lib/Kconfig.debug, so the KUnit submenu now shows up under the "Kernel Hacking" menu. As a consequence of this, I rewrote patch 06/18 (kbuild: enable building KUnit), and now needs to be re-acked/reviewed. ## Background This patch set proposes KUnit, a lightweight unit testing and mocking framework for the Linux kernel. Unlike Autotest and kselftest, KUnit is a true unit testing framework; it does not require installing the kernel on a test machine or in a VM (however, KUnit still allows you to run tests on test machines or in VMs if you want[3]) and does not require tests to be written in userspace running on a host kernel. Additionally, KUnit is fast: From invocation to completion KUnit can run several dozen tests in about a second. Currently, the entire KUnit test suite for KUnit runs in under a second from the initial invocation (build time excluded). KUnit is heavily inspired by JUnit, Python's unittest.mock, and Googletest/Googlemock for C++. KUnit provides facilities for defining unit test cases, grouping related test cases into test suites, providing common infrastructure for running tests, mocking, spying, and much more. ### What's so special about unit testing? A unit test is supposed to test a single unit of code in isolation, hence the name. There should be no dependencies outside the control of the test; this means no external dependencies, which makes tests orders of magnitudes faster. Likewise, since there are no external dependencies, there are no hoops to jump through to run the tests. Additionally, this makes unit tests deterministic: a failing unit test always indicates a problem. Finally, because unit tests necessarily have finer granularity, they are able to test all code paths easily solving the classic problem of difficulty in exercising error handling code. ### Is KUnit trying to replace other testing frameworks for the kernel? No. Most existing tests for the Linux kernel are end-to-end tests, which have their place. A well tested system has lots of unit tests, a reasonable number of integration tests, and some end-to-end tests. KUnit is just trying to address the unit test space which is currently not being addressed. ### More information on KUnit There is a bunch of documentation near the end of this patch set that describes how to use KUnit and best practices for writing unit tests. For convenience I am hosting the compiled docs here[4]. Additionally for convenience, I have applied these patches to a branch[5]. The repo may be cloned with: git clone https://kunit.googlesource.com/linux This patchset is on the kunit/initial/v5.3/v16 branch. [1] https://www.lkml.org/lkml/2019/9/20/696 [2] https://www.lkml.org/lkml/2019/9/20/738 [3] https://google.github.io/kunit-docs/third_party/kernel/docs/usage.html#kunit-on-non-uml-architectures [4] https://google.github.io/kunit-docs/third_party/kernel/docs/ [5] https://kunit.googlesource.com/linux/+/kunit/initial/v5.3/v16 --- Avinash Kondareddy (1): kunit: test: add tests for KUnit managed resources Brendan Higgins (16): kunit: test: add KUnit test runner core kunit: test: add test resource management API kunit: test: add string_stream a std::stream like string builder kunit: test: add assertion printing library kunit: test: add the concept of expectations lib: enable building KUnit in lib/ kunit: test: add initial tests objtool: add kunit_try_catch_throw to the noreturn list kunit: test: add support for test abort kunit: test: add tests for kunit test abort kunit: test: add the concept of assertions kunit: defconfig: add defconfigs for building KUnit tests Documentation: kunit: add documentation for KUnit MAINTAINERS: add entry for KUnit the unit testing framework MAINTAINERS: add proc sysctl KUnit test to PROC SYSCTL section kunit: fix failure to build without printk Felix Guo (1): kunit: tool: add Python wrappers for running KUnit tests Iurii Zaikin (1): kernel/sysctl-test: Add null pointer test for sysctl.c:proc_dointvec() Documentation/dev-tools/index.rst | 1 + Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/api/index.rst | 16 + Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/api/test.rst | 11 + Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/faq.rst | 62 + Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/index.rst | 79 + Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/start.rst | 180 ++ Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/usage.rst | 576 +++++++ MAINTAINERS | 13 + arch/um/configs/kunit_defconfig | 3 + include/kunit/assert.h | 356 ++++ include/kunit/string-stream.h | 51 + include/kunit/test.h | 1490 +++++++++++++++++ include/kunit/try-catch.h | 75 + kernel/Makefile | 2 + kernel/sysctl-test.c | 392 +++++ lib/Kconfig.debug | 13 + lib/Makefile | 2 + lib/kunit/Kconfig | 38 + lib/kunit/Makefile | 9 + lib/kunit/assert.c | 141 ++ lib/kunit/example-test.c | 88 + lib/kunit/string-stream-test.c | 52 + lib/kunit/string-stream.c | 217 +++ lib/kunit/test-test.c | 331 ++++ lib/kunit/test.c | 478 ++++++ lib/kunit/try-catch.c | 118 ++ tools/objtool/check.c | 1 + tools/testing/kunit/.gitignore | 3 + tools/testing/kunit/configs/all_tests.config | 3 + tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py | 136 ++ tools/testing/kunit/kunit_config.py | 66 + tools/testing/kunit/kunit_kernel.py | 149 ++ tools/testing/kunit/kunit_parser.py | 310 ++++ tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py | 206 +++ .../test_is_test_passed-all_passed.log | 32 + .../test_data/test_is_test_passed-crash.log | 69 + .../test_data/test_is_test_passed-failure.log | 36 + .../test_is_test_passed-no_tests_run.log | 75 + .../test_output_isolated_correctly.log | 106 ++ .../test_data/test_read_from_file.kconfig | 17 + 40 files changed, 6003 insertions(+) create mode 100644 Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/api/index.rst create mode 100644 Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/api/test.rst create mode 100644 Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/faq.rst create mode 100644 Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/index.rst create mode 100644 Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/start.rst create mode 100644 Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/usage.rst create mode 100644 arch/um/configs/kunit_defconfig create mode 100644 include/kunit/assert.h create mode 100644 include/kunit/string-stream.h create mode 100644 include/kunit/test.h create mode 100644 include/kunit/try-catch.h create mode 100644 kernel/sysctl-test.c create mode 100644 lib/kunit/Kconfig create mode 100644 lib/kunit/Makefile create mode 100644 lib/kunit/assert.c create mode 100644 lib/kunit/example-test.c create mode 100644 lib/kunit/string-stream-test.c create mode 100644 lib/kunit/string-stream.c create mode 100644 lib/kunit/test-test.c create mode 100644 lib/kunit/test.c create mode 100644 lib/kunit/try-catch.c create mode 100644 tools/testing/kunit/.gitignore create mode 100644 tools/testing/kunit/configs/all_tests.config create mode 100755 tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py create mode 100644 tools/testing/kunit/kunit_config.py create mode 100644 tools/testing/kunit/kunit_kernel.py create mode 100644 tools/testing/kunit/kunit_parser.py create mode 100755 tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py create mode 100644 tools/testing/kunit/test_data/test_is_test_passed-all_passed.log create mode 100644 tools/testing/kunit/test_data/test_is_test_passed-crash.log create mode 100644 tools/testing/kunit/test_data/test_is_test_passed-failure.log create mode 100644 tools/testing/kunit/test_data/test_is_test_passed-no_tests_run.log create mode 100644 tools/testing/kunit/test_data/test_output_isolated_correctly.log create mode 100644 tools/testing/kunit/test_data/test_read_from_file.kconfig -- 2.23.0.351.gc4317032e6-goog _______________________________________________ linux-um mailing list linux-um@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-um