From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64479C3A5A6 for ; Sun, 22 Sep 2019 19:37:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BBD421BE5 for ; Sun, 22 Sep 2019 19:37:19 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1569181039; bh=1yjOP+y2VDBuHbUnkJ0x7XMZLigsvLv6f6vVBFKWGfQ=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:List-ID:From; b=JeODQ8Ny829dBGl5P98ZXPaUJMirpfaOnmgD/1NlnVhF0P0RKfQuNRRTua6vnHs46 iHOpW/1F4DiHCzOY9uz+ROsntCanAmNH5psrN7lpg6H3C5iasGtyT52rSw65kZZFaX DfCts5pFdkTlr3Idz2NKCQZt+3hCbGjaLEbRm4yg= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2392623AbfIVThR (ORCPT ); Sun, 22 Sep 2019 15:37:17 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:41670 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2389626AbfIVSpx (ORCPT ); Sun, 22 Sep 2019 14:45:53 -0400 Received: from sasha-vm.mshome.net (c-73-47-72-35.hsd1.nh.comcast.net [73.47.72.35]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C551D2190F; Sun, 22 Sep 2019 18:45:51 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1569177952; bh=1yjOP+y2VDBuHbUnkJ0x7XMZLigsvLv6f6vVBFKWGfQ=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=TtqxvQc9sxRRBPz3pnjo4Vd0BDen60NM8RBQ4a54nI3VRVrRjMsWhtLwFMTOeQ5ov rINHeIKiFpf+7XBryS8RxAdN8APoQ506BeD0E+IYE2Hcg2uzjc/GOqffkGB5+OW9d0 rh1iu+6znZs/d0ijYKfr0xheUkAuc6KDVuJkC2Ao= From: Sasha Levin To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: Jiri Slaby , "Rafael J . Wysocki" , Sasha Levin , linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.3 058/203] ACPI / processor: don't print errors for processorIDs == 0xff Date: Sun, 22 Sep 2019 14:41:24 -0400 Message-Id: <20190922184350.30563-58-sashal@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.20.1 In-Reply-To: <20190922184350.30563-1-sashal@kernel.org> References: <20190922184350.30563-1-sashal@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-stable: review X-Patchwork-Hint: Ignore Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org From: Jiri Slaby [ Upstream commit 2c2b005f549544c13ef4cfb0e4842949066889bc ] Some platforms define their processors in this manner: Device (SCK0) { Name (_HID, "ACPI0004" /* Module Device */) // _HID: Hardware ID Name (_UID, "CPUSCK0") // _UID: Unique ID Processor (CP00, 0x00, 0x00000410, 0x06){} Processor (CP01, 0x02, 0x00000410, 0x06){} Processor (CP02, 0x04, 0x00000410, 0x06){} Processor (CP03, 0x06, 0x00000410, 0x06){} Processor (CP04, 0x01, 0x00000410, 0x06){} Processor (CP05, 0x03, 0x00000410, 0x06){} Processor (CP06, 0x05, 0x00000410, 0x06){} Processor (CP07, 0x07, 0x00000410, 0x06){} Processor (CP08, 0xFF, 0x00000410, 0x06){} Processor (CP09, 0xFF, 0x00000410, 0x06){} Processor (CP0A, 0xFF, 0x00000410, 0x06){} Processor (CP0B, 0xFF, 0x00000410, 0x06){} ... The processors marked as 0xff are invalid, there are only 8 of them in this case. So do not print an error on ids == 0xff, just print an info message. Actually, we could return ENODEV even on the first CPU with ID 0xff, but ACPI spec does not forbid the 0xff value to be a processor ID. Given 0xff could be a correct one, we would break working systems if we returned ENODEV. Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin --- drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c | 10 +++++++--- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c b/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c index 24f065114d424..2c4dda0787e84 100644 --- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c +++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c @@ -279,9 +279,13 @@ static int acpi_processor_get_info(struct acpi_device *device) } if (acpi_duplicate_processor_id(pr->acpi_id)) { - dev_err(&device->dev, - "Failed to get unique processor _UID (0x%x)\n", - pr->acpi_id); + if (pr->acpi_id == 0xff) + dev_info_once(&device->dev, + "Entry not well-defined, consider updating BIOS\n"); + else + dev_err(&device->dev, + "Failed to get unique processor _UID (0x%x)\n", + pr->acpi_id); return -ENODEV; } -- 2.20.1