All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To: Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@ubuntu.com>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>, Will Drewry <wad@chromium.org>,
	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-um@lists.infradead.org, x86@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] seccomp: remove unused arg from secure_computing()
Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2019 11:49:16 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190923094916.GB15355@zn.tnic> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190920131907.6886-1-christian.brauner@ubuntu.com>

On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 03:19:09PM +0200, Christian Brauner wrote:
> While touching seccomp code I realized that the struct seccomp_data
> argument to secure_computing() seems to be unused by all current
> callers. So let's remove it unless there is some subtlety I missed.
> Note, I only tested this on x86.

What was amluto thinking in

2f275de5d1ed ("seccomp: Add a seccomp_data parameter secure_computing()")

?

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To: Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@ubuntu.com>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, Will Drewry <wad@chromium.org>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
	linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
	linux-um@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] seccomp: remove unused arg from secure_computing()
Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2019 11:49:16 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190923094916.GB15355@zn.tnic> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190920131907.6886-1-christian.brauner@ubuntu.com>

On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 03:19:09PM +0200, Christian Brauner wrote:
> While touching seccomp code I realized that the struct seccomp_data
> argument to secure_computing() seems to be unused by all current
> callers. So let's remove it unless there is some subtlety I missed.
> Note, I only tested this on x86.

What was amluto thinking in

2f275de5d1ed ("seccomp: Add a seccomp_data parameter secure_computing()")

?

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2019-09-23  9:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-09-20 13:19 [PATCH] seccomp: remove unused arg from secure_computing() Christian Brauner
2019-09-20 13:19 ` Christian Brauner
2019-09-23  9:49 ` Borislav Petkov [this message]
2019-09-23  9:49   ` Borislav Petkov
2019-09-23 18:41   ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-09-23 18:41     ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-09-23 19:34     ` Borislav Petkov
2019-09-23 19:34       ` Borislav Petkov
2019-09-23 23:51       ` Kees Cook
2019-09-23 23:51         ` Kees Cook
2019-09-24  6:19       ` Christian Brauner
2019-09-24  6:19         ` Christian Brauner
2019-09-24  6:30     ` Christian Brauner
2019-09-24  6:30       ` Christian Brauner
2019-09-24  6:44 ` [PATCH v1] seccomp: simplify secure_computing() Christian Brauner
2019-09-24  6:44   ` Christian Brauner
2019-09-24  9:51   ` Borislav Petkov
2019-09-24  9:51     ` Borislav Petkov
2019-09-24 17:11   ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-09-24 17:11     ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-10-10 21:53   ` Kees Cook
2019-10-10 21:53     ` Kees Cook
2019-10-11  9:45     ` Christian Brauner
2019-10-11  9:45       ` Christian Brauner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190923094916.GB15355@zn.tnic \
    --to=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=christian.brauner@ubuntu.com \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-um@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=wad@chromium.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.