From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Cyril Hrubis Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2019 10:33:46 +0200 Subject: [LTP] LTP Release In-Reply-To: <748796853.2255246.1569486581084.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> References: <20190906130707.GA7515@rei.lan> <20190925112236.GA17496@rei.lan> <748796853.2255246.1569486581084.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> Message-ID: <20190926083346.GA13769@rei.lan> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: ltp@lists.linux.it Hi! > > I did a few testruns and so far it looks good. > > > > I've send one patch for acct02, which is mostly cosmetic, that I would > > like to get merged. > > > > I would still consider merging the eBPF regression test, does anybody > > have a strong opinion on this? > > > > Apart from this preadv203 sometimes fails to trigger EAGAIN on virtual > > machines, but I doubt we can fix this before the release, I will try to > > do so later on. > > > > The rest seems to be good, i.e. failures does not seem to be bugs in > > tests. > > > > What is the status from rest of you? Is there anything that should be > > considered for the release? Is something failing unexpectedly? > > I'm thinking if we should patch BPF tests to increase max lock memory > to +1MB. On Fedora30 default limit is '64', and I found couple > systems which by default come very close to that limit right after boot. > So even one iteration of BPF tests will hit a failure. I've seen them fail on ppc64le, because of 64k pages as well. Maybe we shouldn't workaround the failure but rather print a TINFO message that the limit is too low and the test is likely to fail. Then I will write the email to kernel developers once the release is done and we will do something about them later on. -- Cyril Hrubis chrubis@suse.cz