From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8682C32792 for ; Thu, 3 Oct 2019 16:17:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC20520865 for ; Thu, 3 Oct 2019 16:17:12 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1570119432; bh=2ZDyCA/W82QMIcVj4QKv0dW3+M4TLs0nbEMoSYY3yjc=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:List-ID:From; b=mztWMoFFb3txsk5eVy+q9GTJP+sCIgX3N4KWZxXKqehTJ89J2p1FjCkt/G2qBdU+D eqr0LZLedIVJXUOmRmtJNTTISudfNsRjz3sMzKF9j6md8xVKQS+i14v86UqsaXHXts f0652D6kC++wifBQXaigfCSsfBQCSnglB61FZ9qs= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2389186AbfJCQRL (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Oct 2019 12:17:11 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:42588 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2389143AbfJCQRG (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Oct 2019 12:17:06 -0400 Received: from localhost (83-86-89-107.cable.dynamic.v4.ziggo.nl [83.86.89.107]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4F9E92133F; Thu, 3 Oct 2019 16:17:05 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1570119425; bh=2ZDyCA/W82QMIcVj4QKv0dW3+M4TLs0nbEMoSYY3yjc=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=uoQU3yfyu5tFfWIJPo/W1V9yItdrZfPnzli2g2kuXZHs0DHy+i/5I9CoG2bZsYLZB 8bF+lk+p5ixUlQjN6ufR6Io9HylbfNv2QHv1m/49CDn0WaX3RWgYl5MjZZJjWtydKD YHrFxpaJsh1kQzQsYAObVwmuNi412w+ABowF5FPM= From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable@vger.kernel.org, Jiri Slaby , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Sasha Levin Subject: [PATCH 4.19 059/211] ACPI / processor: dont print errors for processorIDs == 0xff Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2019 17:52:05 +0200 Message-Id: <20191003154501.897612747@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.23.0 In-Reply-To: <20191003154447.010950442@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20191003154447.010950442@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.66 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Jiri Slaby [ Upstream commit 2c2b005f549544c13ef4cfb0e4842949066889bc ] Some platforms define their processors in this manner: Device (SCK0) { Name (_HID, "ACPI0004" /* Module Device */) // _HID: Hardware ID Name (_UID, "CPUSCK0") // _UID: Unique ID Processor (CP00, 0x00, 0x00000410, 0x06){} Processor (CP01, 0x02, 0x00000410, 0x06){} Processor (CP02, 0x04, 0x00000410, 0x06){} Processor (CP03, 0x06, 0x00000410, 0x06){} Processor (CP04, 0x01, 0x00000410, 0x06){} Processor (CP05, 0x03, 0x00000410, 0x06){} Processor (CP06, 0x05, 0x00000410, 0x06){} Processor (CP07, 0x07, 0x00000410, 0x06){} Processor (CP08, 0xFF, 0x00000410, 0x06){} Processor (CP09, 0xFF, 0x00000410, 0x06){} Processor (CP0A, 0xFF, 0x00000410, 0x06){} Processor (CP0B, 0xFF, 0x00000410, 0x06){} ... The processors marked as 0xff are invalid, there are only 8 of them in this case. So do not print an error on ids == 0xff, just print an info message. Actually, we could return ENODEV even on the first CPU with ID 0xff, but ACPI spec does not forbid the 0xff value to be a processor ID. Given 0xff could be a correct one, we would break working systems if we returned ENODEV. Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin --- drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c | 10 +++++++--- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c b/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c index fc447410ae4d1..a448cdf567188 100644 --- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c +++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c @@ -282,9 +282,13 @@ static int acpi_processor_get_info(struct acpi_device *device) } if (acpi_duplicate_processor_id(pr->acpi_id)) { - dev_err(&device->dev, - "Failed to get unique processor _UID (0x%x)\n", - pr->acpi_id); + if (pr->acpi_id == 0xff) + dev_info_once(&device->dev, + "Entry not well-defined, consider updating BIOS\n"); + else + dev_err(&device->dev, + "Failed to get unique processor _UID (0x%x)\n", + pr->acpi_id); return -ENODEV; } -- 2.20.1