From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1272ECE595 for ; Sun, 6 Oct 2019 17:55:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C96F42077B for ; Sun, 6 Oct 2019 17:55:01 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1570384501; bh=zCKmjyZlrLC7ANRYhp/52vjRW/jBssQmM8dBavnIWww=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:List-ID:From; b=OmCnvuilIxkumFkYsSGfWbKZoaNQfn4uxrERYl4Lyjrj3t7RApT2Zd7UQymbuGrG1 OfTMxPZiP9frXnS2uSCZkQAbV+t2w43u+y4im6j1lr9ANJ5t+/fmnsM8xGnkdYj+NF of1VAD9f3VSf61ZB3lU2MY5o99wbGOl3PrCIUjR8= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727278AbfJFRyg (ORCPT ); Sun, 6 Oct 2019 13:54:36 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:51354 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728277AbfJFRy3 (ORCPT ); Sun, 6 Oct 2019 13:54:29 -0400 Received: from localhost (83-86-89-107.cable.dynamic.v4.ziggo.nl [83.86.89.107]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0DC36222D2; Sun, 6 Oct 2019 17:45:56 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1570383957; bh=zCKmjyZlrLC7ANRYhp/52vjRW/jBssQmM8dBavnIWww=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=o1ScnQNQXs+I1VLT3AWoD/Tyz8tjKjNY/Ci2iGgcNwbDJLDH8fkfBfh7vWKYRF1lq XaCSVJqotSzzVIFn/hgDntgvRTuKJT/mvzcpT3J4Td7L+sjfCUmLxP6dzjXVpwWISc 2yyEwnX2l7LlRMTDe2o4BeQL9rr6SlBZoj9PnaLY= From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable@vger.kernel.org, Eric Dumazet , Florian Westphal , Hannes Frederic Sowa , syzbot , "David S. Miller" Subject: [PATCH 5.3 131/166] ipv6: drop incoming packets having a v4mapped source address Date: Sun, 6 Oct 2019 19:21:37 +0200 Message-Id: <20191006171224.252589027@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.23.0 In-Reply-To: <20191006171212.850660298@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20191006171212.850660298@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.66 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Eric Dumazet [ Upstream commit 6af1799aaf3f1bc8defedddfa00df3192445bbf3 ] This began with a syzbot report. syzkaller was injecting IPv6 TCP SYN packets having a v4mapped source address. After an unsuccessful 4-tuple lookup, TCP creates a request socket (SYN_RECV) and calls reqsk_queue_hash_req() reqsk_queue_hash_req() calls sk_ehashfn(sk) At this point we have AF_INET6 sockets, and the heuristic used by sk_ehashfn() to either hash the IPv4 or IPv6 addresses is to use ipv6_addr_v4mapped(&sk->sk_v6_daddr) For the particular spoofed packet, we end up hashing V4 addresses which were not initialized by the TCP IPv6 stack, so KMSAN fired a warning. I first fixed sk_ehashfn() to test both source and destination addresses, but then faced various problems, including user-space programs like packetdrill that had similar assumptions. Instead of trying to fix the whole ecosystem, it is better to admit that we have a dual stack behavior, and that we can not build linux kernels without V4 stack anyway. The dual stack API automatically forces the traffic to be IPv4 if v4mapped addresses are used at bind() or connect(), so it makes no sense to allow IPv6 traffic to use the same v4mapped class. Fixes: 1da177e4c3f4 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2") Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet Cc: Florian Westphal Cc: Hannes Frederic Sowa Reported-by: syzbot Signed-off-by: David S. Miller Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- net/ipv6/ip6_input.c | 10 ++++++++++ 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+) --- a/net/ipv6/ip6_input.c +++ b/net/ipv6/ip6_input.c @@ -221,6 +221,16 @@ static struct sk_buff *ip6_rcv_core(stru if (ipv6_addr_is_multicast(&hdr->saddr)) goto err; + /* While RFC4291 is not explicit about v4mapped addresses + * in IPv6 headers, it seems clear linux dual-stack + * model can not deal properly with these. + * Security models could be fooled by ::ffff:127.0.0.1 for example. + * + * https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-itojun-v6ops-v4mapped-harmful-02 + */ + if (ipv6_addr_v4mapped(&hdr->saddr)) + goto err; + skb->transport_header = skb->network_header + sizeof(*hdr); IP6CB(skb)->nhoff = offsetof(struct ipv6hdr, nexthdr);