From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.2 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC981ECE58C for ; Thu, 10 Oct 2019 01:10:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A532A21848 for ; Thu, 10 Oct 2019 01:10:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1732034AbfJJBKA (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Oct 2019 21:10:00 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:54792 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1731751AbfJJBKA (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Oct 2019 21:10:00 -0400 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx07.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DBDD930860C5; Thu, 10 Oct 2019 01:09:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from redhat.com (ovpn-120-118.rdu2.redhat.com [10.10.120.118]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7787610013A1; Thu, 10 Oct 2019 01:09:54 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2019 21:09:52 -0400 From: Don Zickus To: Sasha Levin Cc: CKI Project , Memory Management , Jan Stancek , Linux Stable maillist , Zhaojuan Guo Subject: Re: =?utf-8?B?4p2M?= FAIL: Stable queue: queue-5.3 Message-ID: <20191010010952.suo6opzifh5y37gm@redhat.com> References: <20191009224437.GY1396@sasha-vm> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20191009224437.GY1396@sasha-vm> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.84 on 10.5.11.22 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.44]); Thu, 10 Oct 2019 01:09:59 +0000 (UTC) Sender: stable-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Oct 09, 2019 at 06:44:37PM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote: > On Wed, Oct 09, 2019 at 06:11:40PM -0400, CKI Project wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > We ran automated tests on a patchset that was proposed for merging into this > > kernel tree. The patches were applied to: > > > > Kernel repo: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git > > Commit: 52020d3f6633 - Linux 5.3.5 > > > > The results of these automated tests are provided below. > > > > Overall result: FAILED (see details below) > > Merge: OK > > Compile: OK > > Tests: FAILED > > > > All kernel binaries, config files, and logs are available for download here: > > > > https://artifacts.cki-project.org/pipelines/214657 > > > > One or more kernel tests failed: > > > > x86_64: > > ❌ Boot test > > ❌ Boot test > > ❌ Boot test > > ❌ Boot test > > Hm, I looked here: > > https://artifacts.cki-project.org/pipelines/214657/logs/x86_64_host_1_Boot_test_dmesg.log > > and here: > > https://artifacts.cki-project.org/pipelines/214657/logs/x86_64_host_2_Boot_test_dmesg.log > > but both look sane. What am I missing? I don't believe you are. I looked at the raw beaker jobs and the x86_64 machines passed and another set is still queued. There is an aarch64 machine that failed to boot. Unfortunately, I am skeptical of this result too but I would wait for the CKI team to triage this. Sorry about that. Cheers, Don