Hi!

> I must say I'm not a big fan of this change.
> It adds a bunch of code to the LED core and gives small
> functionality in a reward. It may also influence maximum
> software blinking rate, so I'd rather avoid calling
> regulator_enable/disable when timer trigger is set.
> 
> It will of course require more code.
> 
> Since AFAIR Pavel was original proponent of this change then
> I'd like to see his opinion before we move on to discussing
> possible improvements to this patch.

Was I?

Okay, this series looks quite confusing to me. First, 1/3 looks
"interesting" (would have to analyze it way more).

Second, 3/3... So we have a LED driver _and_ a regulator? So yes, the
chip driving a LED is usually ... voltage/current regulator. What is
second regulator doing there? Is that a common setup?

Best regards,
								Pavel
								
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html