From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Douglas RAILLARD <douglas.raillard@arm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
mingo@redhat.com, rjw@rjwysocki.net, viresh.kumar@linaro.org,
juri.lelli@redhat.com, vincent.guittot@linaro.org,
dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, qperret@qperret.net,
patrick.bellasi@matbug.net, dh.han@samsung.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 0/6] sched/cpufreq: Make schedutil energy aware
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2019 16:53:15 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191014145315.GZ2311@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191011134500.235736-1-douglas.raillard@arm.com>
On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 02:44:54PM +0100, Douglas RAILLARD wrote:
> This has been ligthly tested with a rtapp task ramping from 10% to 75%
> utilisation on a big core. Results are improved by fast ramp-up
> EWMA [1], since it greatly reduces the oscillation in frequency at first
> idle when ramping up.
>
> [1] [PATCH] sched/fair: util_est: fast ramp-up EWMA on utilization increases
> Message-ID: <20190620150555.15717-1-patrick.bellasi@arm.com>
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190620150555.15717-1-patrick.bellasi@arm.com/
I don't really see anything fundamentally weird here. Any actual numbers
or other means of quantifying the improvement these patches bring?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-10-14 14:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-10-11 13:44 [RFC PATCH v3 0/6] sched/cpufreq: Make schedutil energy aware Douglas RAILLARD
2019-10-11 13:44 ` [RFC PATCH v3 1/6] PM: Introduce em_pd_get_higher_freq() Douglas RAILLARD
2019-10-17 8:57 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2019-10-17 9:58 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2019-10-17 11:09 ` Douglas Raillard
2019-10-11 13:44 ` [RFC PATCH v3 2/6] sched/cpufreq: Attach perf domain to sugov policy Douglas RAILLARD
2019-10-17 8:57 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2019-10-17 10:22 ` Douglas Raillard
2019-10-11 13:44 ` [RFC PATCH v3 3/6] sched/cpufreq: Hook em_pd_get_higher_power() into get_next_freq() Douglas RAILLARD
2019-10-11 13:44 ` [RFC PATCH v3 4/6] sched/cpufreq: Introduce sugov_cpu_ramp_boost Douglas RAILLARD
2019-10-14 14:33 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-10-14 15:32 ` Douglas Raillard
2019-10-17 8:57 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2019-10-17 11:19 ` Douglas Raillard
2019-10-11 13:44 ` [RFC PATCH v3 5/6] sched/cpufreq: Boost schedutil frequency ramp up Douglas RAILLARD
2019-10-17 9:21 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2019-10-11 13:45 ` [RFC PATCH v3 6/6] sched/cpufreq: Add schedutil_em_tp tracepoint Douglas RAILLARD
2019-10-14 14:53 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2019-10-14 15:50 ` [RFC PATCH v3 0/6] sched/cpufreq: Make schedutil energy aware Douglas Raillard
2019-10-17 9:50 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-10-17 11:11 ` Quentin Perret
2019-10-17 14:11 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-10-18 7:44 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2019-10-18 7:59 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-10-18 17:24 ` Douglas Raillard
2019-10-18 8:11 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-10-17 14:23 ` Douglas Raillard
2019-10-17 14:53 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-10-17 19:07 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-10-18 11:46 ` Douglas Raillard
2019-10-18 12:07 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-10-18 14:44 ` Douglas Raillard
2019-10-18 15:15 ` Vincent Guittot
2019-10-18 16:03 ` Douglas Raillard
2019-10-18 15:20 ` Vincent Guittot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191014145315.GZ2311@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=dh.han@samsung.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=douglas.raillard@arm.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=patrick.bellasi@matbug.net \
--cc=qperret@qperret.net \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.