[PATCH bpf v4] xdp: Handle device unregister for devmap_hash map type

* [PATCH bpf v4] xdp: Handle device unregister for devmap_hash map type
@ 2019-10-19 11:19 Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
  2019-10-21 15:56 ` Martin Lau
  2019-10-21 22:50 ` Alexei Starovoitov
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen @ 2019-10-19 11:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: daniel, ast
  Cc: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen, bpf, netdev, kafai, Tetsuo Handa

It seems I forgot to add handling of devmap_hash type maps to the device
unregister hook for devmaps. This omission causes devices to not be
properly released, which causes hangs.

Fix this by adding the missing handler.

Fixes: 6f9d451ab1a3 ("xdp: Add devmap_hash map type for looking up devices by hashed index")
Reported-by: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Signed-off-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@redhat.com>
---
v4:
  - Don't forget to decrement dtab->items when removing item from map
v3:
  - Use u32 for loop iterator variable
  - Since we're holding the lock we can just iterate with hlist_for_each_entry_safe()
v2:
  - Grab the update lock while walking the map and removing entries.

 kernel/bpf/devmap.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+)

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/devmap.c b/kernel/bpf/devmap.c
index c0a48f336997..3867864cdc2f 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/devmap.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/devmap.c
@@ -719,6 +719,32 @@ const struct bpf_map_ops dev_map_hash_ops = {
 	.map_check_btf = map_check_no_btf,
 };
 
+static void dev_map_hash_remove_netdev(struct bpf_dtab *dtab,
+				       struct net_device *netdev)
+{
+	unsigned long flags;
+	u32 i;
+
+	spin_lock_irqsave(&dtab->index_lock, flags);
+	for (i = 0; i < dtab->n_buckets; i++) {
+		struct bpf_dtab_netdev *dev;
+		struct hlist_head *head;
+		struct hlist_node *next;
+
+		head = dev_map_index_hash(dtab, i);
+
+		hlist_for_each_entry_safe(dev, next, head, index_hlist) {
+			if (netdev != dev->dev)
+				continue;
+
+			dtab->items--;
+			hlist_del_rcu(&dev->index_hlist);
+			call_rcu(&dev->rcu, __dev_map_entry_free);
+		}
+	}
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dtab->index_lock, flags);
+}
+
 static int dev_map_notification(struct notifier_block *notifier,
 				ulong event, void *ptr)
 {
@@ -735,6 +761,11 @@ static int dev_map_notification(struct notifier_block *notifier,
 		 */
 		rcu_read_lock();
 		list_for_each_entry_rcu(dtab, &dev_map_list, list) {
+			if (dtab->map.map_type == BPF_MAP_TYPE_DEVMAP_HASH) {
+				dev_map_hash_remove_netdev(dtab, netdev);
+				continue;
+			}
+
 			for (i = 0; i < dtab->map.max_entries; i++) {
 				struct bpf_dtab_netdev *dev, *odev;
 
-- 
2.23.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread