All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
To: Xiang Zheng <zhengxiang9@huawei.com>
Cc: bhelgaas@google.com, wangxiongfeng2@huawei.com,
	wanghaibin.wang@huawei.com, guoheyi@huawei.com,
	yebiaoxiang@huawei.com, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rjw@rjwysocki.net,
	tglx@linutronix.de, guohanjun@huawei.com,
	yangyingliang@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pci: lock the pci_cfg_wait queue for the consistency of data
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2019 09:30:41 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191028163041.GA8257@bombadil.infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191028091809.35212-1-zhengxiang9@huawei.com>

On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 05:18:09PM +0800, Xiang Zheng wrote:
> Commit "7ea7e98fd8d0" suggests that the "pci_lock" is sufficient,
> and all the callers of pci_wait_cfg() are wrapped with the "pci_lock".
> 
> However, since the commit "cdcb33f98244" merged, the accesses to
> the pci_cfg_wait queue are not safe anymore. A "pci_lock" is
> insufficient and we need to hold an additional queue lock while
> read/write the wait queue.
> 
> So let's use the add_wait_queue()/remove_wait_queue() instead of
> __add_wait_queue()/__remove_wait_queue().

As I said earlier, this reintroduces the deadlock addressed by
cdcb33f9824429a926b971bf041a6cec238f91ff

  reply	other threads:[~2019-10-28 16:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-10-28  9:18 [PATCH] pci: lock the pci_cfg_wait queue for the consistency of data Xiang Zheng
2019-10-28 16:30 ` Matthew Wilcox [this message]
2019-10-29  3:34   ` Xiang Zheng
2019-11-08  1:12     ` Xiang Zheng

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20191028163041.GA8257@bombadil.infradead.org \
    --to=willy@infradead.org \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=guohanjun@huawei.com \
    --cc=guoheyi@huawei.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=wanghaibin.wang@huawei.com \
    --cc=wangxiongfeng2@huawei.com \
    --cc=yangyingliang@huawei.com \
    --cc=yebiaoxiang@huawei.com \
    --cc=zhengxiang9@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.