From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.linutronix.de (193.142.43.55:993) by crypto-ml.lab.linutronix.de with IMAP4-SSL for ; 29 Oct 2019 12:32:09 -0000 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15] helo=mx1.suse.de) by Galois.linutronix.de with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1iPQfP-0007SL-Kh for speck@linutronix.de; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 13:32:08 +0100 Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.220.254]) by mx1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 939AAB30A for ; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 12:31:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2019 13:31:57 +0100 From: Joerg Roedel Subject: [MODERATED] Re: ***UNCHECKED*** Re: Re: Re: [PATCH v7 0/5] NX 0 Message-ID: <20191029123157.GG838@suse.de> References: <1571902455-22638-1-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com> <20191028160203.GB838@suse.de> <20191029093900.GF838@suse.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: speck@linutronix.de List-ID: On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 12:00:10PM +0100, speck for Thomas Gleixner wrote: > Not a conflict, but 3/5 needs an extra delta patch on top AFAICT. Paolo said he > would send a v8. I'll have a look later today. Ah okay, Paolo wanted to include the fix for the !npt/!ept cases (where efer.nx was clear for the guest at early boot so that the nx-pages caused rsvd-bit faults). But he sent the fix separatly to the public already here: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20191027152323.24326-1-pbonzini@redhat.com/ I guess he plans to send it upstream before the CRD date, Paolo? Regards, Joerg