From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B571CA9EC4 for ; Wed, 30 Oct 2019 02:00:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 111E72087E for ; Wed, 30 Oct 2019 02:00:39 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mbobrowski-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.i=@mbobrowski-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.b="fgO3Pqs6" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727000AbfJ3CAi (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Oct 2019 22:00:38 -0400 Received: from mail-pg1-f193.google.com ([209.85.215.193]:40154 "EHLO mail-pg1-f193.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726923AbfJ3CAi (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Oct 2019 22:00:38 -0400 Received: by mail-pg1-f193.google.com with SMTP id 15so353128pgt.7 for ; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 19:00:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mbobrowski-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=+MFuJEA0Abfc0BYSugK5QCECCFztGc+UpgkCBaCDRK8=; b=fgO3Pqs6mepR/Q1ADIIzRRDRabX5HGiRznS3H3iWGB0591WjjkdosfKg1Uj/2nc/n/ +2K0FwRGe+Y8FbwUOPMMCOdaa4/aSkAIWgOXFIatnh3BSY02Z452ZIdh+6H96lypDBXk 1AOZb2bUD3y+aGVn6HaHr0Eqi9QZBH+kPwFs8EcyCnkhKN+7qHJGk6qAHdO1lsMux7rl vGgbxB4ZiIg7uUnWIcMOrtlZreoZAG1oYnHPIeDkMIQ62YG4hNFxd+GG+EtXOI7aqlWy /QJwPiIyq91RAfyeDOwZOZ5JowNN1ouMBrf6Yo2XTmOp6SSa+2lAH5QXjy4f1TnRa6PX xC5w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=+MFuJEA0Abfc0BYSugK5QCECCFztGc+UpgkCBaCDRK8=; b=RJE/SzjY3b0rvDNxW6IXgY8NzmQq8tdxAa3rkLNmvWiUr4Er/e6tPx8dni8lFGKmGI gaJArnjlC68luec8sqspdGLy07npzHQNnlrgAJibC+QvyJ2AtplDn1NgdHJ+M+lBbhAf fCS6kF5mNCjJ+8p+XjVeAaAyP32m9K0cwQLyPomzus/LnY3+O9tfx1awWgT24CspVchy AbPZhbzuKxhuhm/qmWu/KvNHF3js4UkHZZ31yYP2YBe5gUjSk9bocOgNCOkO4NNbGAii tQwH2z+8Js2+rIip74yjPim7frsuTpcuNe2YSi3kdpdmcrfc4KsT8wxArKz1Hzet1H5u waxA== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWh6+btkTyOEGpRklrjDue13qCpc1/xJympSXTVeK7u3E57m3tC bEQY7VDM0Imlep646AVHpvqX X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwMRGHkQJcKkmkYFJABIsetu63g01mriWzxjnaIIIr/JovfYplLc4QkVnsWMR/Li2IGa5q8Kg== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:d993:: with SMTP id d19mr10404290pjv.26.1572400831998; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 19:00:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bobrowski ([110.232.114.101]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id f25sm429242pfk.10.2019.10.29.19.00.28 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 29 Oct 2019 19:00:31 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2019 13:00:24 +1100 From: Matthew Bobrowski To: "Theodore Y. Ts'o" Cc: jack@suse.cz, adilger.kernel@dilger.ca, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, hch@infradead.org, david@fromorbit.com, darrick.wong@oracle.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 00/11] ext4: port direct I/O to iomap infrastructure Message-ID: <20191030020022.GA7392@bobrowski> References: <20191029233159.GA8537@mit.edu> <20191029233401.GB8537@mit.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20191029233401.GB8537@mit.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 07:34:01PM -0400, Theodore Y. Ts'o wrote: > On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 07:31:59PM -0400, Theodore Y. Ts'o wrote: > > Hi Matthew, it looks like there are a number of problems with this > > patch series when using the ext3 backwards compatibility mode (e.g., > > no extents enabled). > > > > So the following configurations are failing: > > > > kvm-xfstests -c ext3 generic/091 generic/240 generic/263 This is one mode that I didn't get around to testing. Let me take a look at the above and get back to you. ----