Re: [PATCH 43/50] xtensa: Add show_stack_loglvl()

[Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>]

On Tue 2019-11-05 20:13:22, Max Filippov wrote:
> Hi Dmitry,
> 
> On Tue, Nov 5, 2019 at 7:08 PM Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com> wrote:
> >
> > Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform
> > realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with
> > lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on
> > a platform or user).
> >
> > Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture
> > side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with
> > temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages.
> > And in result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs,
> > but also omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk()
> > was deferred.
> >
> > Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems
> > an easier approach than introducing more printk buffers.
> > Also, it will consolidate printings with headers.
> >
> > Introduce show_stack_loglvl(), that eventually will substitute
> > show_stack().
> >
> > Cc: Chris Zankel <chris@zankel.net>
> > Cc: Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com>
> > Cc: linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org
> > [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190528002412.1625-1-dima@arista.com/T/#u
> > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com>
> > ---
> >  arch/xtensa/kernel/traps.c | 16 +++++++++++-----
> >  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/xtensa/kernel/traps.c b/arch/xtensa/kernel/traps.c
> > index cbc0d673f542..ba6c150095c6 100644
> > --- a/arch/xtensa/kernel/traps.c
> > +++ b/arch/xtensa/kernel/traps.c
> > @@ -502,7 +502,8 @@ static void show_trace(struct task_struct *task, unsigned long *sp,
> >
> >  static int kstack_depth_to_print = 24;
> >
> > -void show_stack(struct task_struct *task, unsigned long *sp)
> > +void show_stack_loglvl(struct task_struct *task, unsigned long *sp,
> > +                      const char *loglvl)
> >  {
> >         int i = 0;
> >         unsigned long *stack;
> > @@ -511,16 +512,21 @@ void show_stack(struct task_struct *task, unsigned long *sp)
> >                 sp = stack_pointer(task);
> >         stack = sp;
> >
> > -       pr_info("Stack:\n");
> > +       printk("%sStack:\n", loglvl);
> >
> >         for (i = 0; i < kstack_depth_to_print; i++) {
> >                 if (kstack_end(sp))
> >                         break;
> > -               pr_cont(" %08lx", *sp++);
> > +               printk("%s %08lx", loglvl, *sp++);

KERN_CONT can be combined with any other loglevel.
So you could keep using pr_cont() together with explicit loglevel:

			pr_cont("%s %08lx", loglvl, *sp++);

It should fix the problems reported below.

Well, the preferred solution would be to snprintf() the continuous
line into a temporary buffer. And printk() it when it is complete.
pr_cont() is not reliable when more CPUs print at the same time.

Best Regards,
Petr

> This change doesn't work well with printk timestamps, it changes
> the following output on xtensa architecture
> 
> [    3.404675] Stack:
> [    3.404861]  a05773e2 00000018 bb03dc34 bb03dc30 a0008640 bb03dc70
> ba9ba410 37c3f000
> [    3.405414]  37c3f000 d7c3f000 00000800 bb03dc50 a02b97ed bb03dc90
> ba9ba400 ba9ba410
> [    3.405969]  a05fc1bc bbff28dc 00000000 bb03dc70 a02b7fb9 bb03dce0
> ba9ba410 a0579044
> 
> into this:
> [    3.056825] Stack:
> [    3.056963]  a04ebb20
> [    3.056995]  bb03dc10
> [    3.057138]  00000001
> [    3.057277]  bb03dc10
> [    3.057815]  a00083ca
> [    3.057965]  bb03dc50
> [    3.058107]  ba9ba410
> [    3.058247]  37c3f000
> [    3.058387]
> [    3.058584]  a05773e2
> [    3.058614]  00000001
> [    3.058755]  a05ca0bc
> [    3.058896]  bb03dc30
> [    3.059035]  a000865c
> [    3.059180]  bb03dc70
> [    3.059319]  ba9ba410
> [    3.059459]  37c3f000
> [    3.059598]
> [    3.059795]  37c3f000
> [    3.059824]  d7c3f000
> [    3.059964]  00000800
> [    3.060103]  bb03dc50
> [    3.060241]  a02b9809
> [    3.060379]  bb03dc90
> [    3.060519]  ba9ba400
> [    3.060658]  ba9ba410
> [    3.060796]
> 
> -- 
> Thanks.
> -- Max