All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
To: Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Julien Thierry <julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com>,
	Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
	Suzuki Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
	Julien Grall <julien.grall.oss@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH kvmtool 09/16] arm: Allow the user to specify RAM base address
Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2019 13:54:52 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191107135452.09c2ff38@donnerap.cambridge.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1569245722-23375-10-git-send-email-alexandru.elisei@arm.com>

On Mon, 23 Sep 2019 14:35:15 +0100
Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com> wrote:

Hi,

> At the moment, the user can specify the amount of RAM a virtual machine
> has, which starts at the fixed address ARM_MEMORY_AREA. The memory below
> this address is used by MMIO and PCI devices.
> 
> However, it might be interesting to specify a different starting address
> for the guest RAM. With this patch, the user can specify the address and
> the amount of RAM a virtual machine has from the command line by using the
> syntax -m/--mem size[@addr]. The address is optional, and must be higher or
> equal to ARM_MEMORY_AREA. If it's not specified, the old behavior is
> preserved.
> 
> This option is guarded by the define ARCH_SUPPORT_CFG_RAM_BASE, and at
> the moment only the arm architecture has support for it. If an
> architecture doesn't implement this feature, then the old behavior is
> preserved and specifying the RAM base address is considered an user
> error.
> 
> This patch is based upon previous work by Julien Grall.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Julien Grall <julien.grall@arm.com>

Same thing here with "S-o-b: Julien" vs. authorship.

> Signed-off-by: Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>
> ---
>  arm/aarch32/include/kvm/kvm-arch.h |  2 +-
>  arm/aarch64/include/kvm/kvm-arch.h |  6 ++---
>  arm/include/arm-common/kvm-arch.h  |  6 +++--
>  arm/kvm.c                          | 17 ++++++++++----
>  builtin-run.c                      | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
>  include/kvm/kvm-config.h           |  3 +++
>  kvm.c                              |  6 +++++
>  7 files changed, 73 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arm/aarch32/include/kvm/kvm-arch.h b/arm/aarch32/include/kvm/kvm-arch.h
> index cd31e72971bd..0aa5db40502d 100644
> --- a/arm/aarch32/include/kvm/kvm-arch.h
> +++ b/arm/aarch32/include/kvm/kvm-arch.h
> @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
>  
>  #define ARM_KERN_OFFSET(...)	0x8000
>  
> -#define ARM_MAX_MEMORY(...)	ARM_LOMAP_MAX_MEMORY
> +#define ARM_MAX_ADDR(...)	ARM_LOMAP_MAX_ADDR
>  
>  #include "arm-common/kvm-arch.h"
>  
> diff --git a/arm/aarch64/include/kvm/kvm-arch.h b/arm/aarch64/include/kvm/kvm-arch.h
> index 1b3d0a5fb1b4..0c58675654c5 100644
> --- a/arm/aarch64/include/kvm/kvm-arch.h
> +++ b/arm/aarch64/include/kvm/kvm-arch.h
> @@ -5,9 +5,9 @@
>  				0x8000				:	\
>  				0x80000)
>  
> -#define ARM_MAX_MEMORY(cfg)	((cfg)->arch.aarch32_guest	?	\
> -				ARM_LOMAP_MAX_MEMORY		:	\
> -				ARM_HIMAP_MAX_MEMORY)
> +#define ARM_MAX_ADDR(cfg)	((cfg)->arch.aarch32_guest	?	\
> +				ARM_LOMAP_MAX_ADDR		:	\
> +				ARM_HIMAP_MAX_ADDR)
>  
>  #include "arm-common/kvm-arch.h"
>  
> diff --git a/arm/include/arm-common/kvm-arch.h b/arm/include/arm-common/kvm-arch.h
> index f8f6b8f98c96..ad1a0e6872dc 100644
> --- a/arm/include/arm-common/kvm-arch.h
> +++ b/arm/include/arm-common/kvm-arch.h
> @@ -14,8 +14,8 @@
>  #define ARM_AXI_AREA		_AC(0x0000000040000000, UL)
>  #define ARM_MEMORY_AREA		_AC(0x0000000080000000, UL)
>  
> -#define ARM_LOMAP_MAX_MEMORY	((1ULL << 32) - ARM_MEMORY_AREA)
> -#define ARM_HIMAP_MAX_MEMORY	((1ULL << 40) - ARM_MEMORY_AREA)
> +#define ARM_LOMAP_MAX_ADDR	(1ULL << 32)
> +#define ARM_HIMAP_MAX_ADDR	(1ULL << 40)
>  
>  #define ARM_GIC_DIST_BASE	(ARM_AXI_AREA - ARM_GIC_DIST_SIZE)
>  #define ARM_GIC_CPUI_BASE	(ARM_GIC_DIST_BASE - ARM_GIC_CPUI_SIZE)
> @@ -35,6 +35,8 @@
>  
>  #define KVM_IOEVENTFD_HAS_PIO	0
>  
> +#define ARCH_SUPPORT_CFG_RAM_BASE	1
> +
>  /*
>   * On a GICv3 there must be one redistributor per vCPU.
>   * The value here is the size for one, we multiply this at runtime with
> diff --git a/arm/kvm.c b/arm/kvm.c
> index 3e49db7704aa..355c118b098a 100644
> --- a/arm/kvm.c
> +++ b/arm/kvm.c
> @@ -77,7 +77,7 @@ void kvm__init_ram(struct kvm *kvm)
>  	madvise(kvm->arch.ram_alloc_start, kvm->arch.ram_alloc_size,
>  		MADV_HUGEPAGE);
>  
> -	phys_start	= ARM_MEMORY_AREA;
> +	phys_start 	= kvm->cfg.ram_base;
>  	phys_size	= kvm->ram_size;
>  	host_mem	= kvm->ram_start;
>  
> @@ -106,8 +106,17 @@ void kvm__arch_set_cmdline(char *cmdline, bool video)
>  
>  void kvm__arch_sanitize_cfg(struct kvm_config *cfg)
>  {
> -	if (cfg->ram_size > ARM_MAX_MEMORY(cfg)) {
> -		cfg->ram_size = ARM_MAX_MEMORY(cfg);
> +	if (cfg->ram_base == INVALID_MEM_ADDR)
> +		cfg->ram_base = ARM_MEMORY_AREA;
> +
> +	if (cfg->ram_base < ARM_MEMORY_AREA ||
> +	    cfg->ram_base >= ARM_MAX_ADDR(cfg)) {
> +		cfg->ram_base = ARM_MEMORY_AREA;
> +		pr_warning("Changing RAM base to 0x%llx", cfg->ram_base);
> +	}
> +
> +	if (cfg->ram_base + cfg->ram_size > ARM_MAX_ADDR(cfg)) {
> +		cfg->ram_size = ARM_MAX_ADDR(cfg) - cfg->ram_base;
>  		pr_warning("Capping memory to %lluMB", cfg->ram_size >> 20);
>  	}

Should we check for alignment of the base address here as well? It definitely needs to be at least page aligned.
But even then: -m 512@0x87654000 doesn't really go anywhere, I needed 1MB alignment for Linux to boot.
But that's probably a Linux restriction. Maybe a warning if the lower 20 bits are not zero?

>  }
> @@ -229,7 +238,7 @@ bool kvm__load_firmware(struct kvm *kvm, const char *firmware_filename)
>  
>  	/* For default firmware address, lets load it at the begining of RAM */
>  	if (fw_addr == 0)
> -		fw_addr = ARM_MEMORY_AREA;
> +		fw_addr = kvm->cfg.ram_base;
>  
>  	if (!validate_fw_addr(kvm, fw_addr))
>  		die("Bad firmware destination: 0x%016llx", fw_addr);
> diff --git a/builtin-run.c b/builtin-run.c
> index 4e0c52b3e027..df255cc44078 100644
> --- a/builtin-run.c
> +++ b/builtin-run.c
> @@ -87,6 +87,44 @@ void kvm_run_set_wrapper_sandbox(void)
>  	kvm_run_wrapper = KVM_RUN_SANDBOX;
>  }
>  
> +static int mem_parser(const struct option *opt, const char *arg, int unset)
> +{
> +	struct kvm_config *cfg = opt->value;
> +	const char *p = arg;
> +	char *next;
> +	u64 size, addr = INVALID_MEM_ADDR;
> +
> +	/* Parse memory size. */
> +	size = strtoll(p, &next, 0);
> +	if (next == p)
> +		die("Invalid memory size");
> +
> +	/* The user specifies the memory in MB, we use bytes. */
> +	size <<= MB_SHIFT;
> +
> +	if (*next == '\0')
> +		goto out;
> +	else if (*next == '@')

I think coding style dictates no "else" if the "if" statement always terminates (return or goto).

> +		p = next + 1;
> +	else
> +		die("Unexpected character after memory size: %c", *next);

And you could move this up, so that you check for bail outs first:
	if (*next == '\0')
		goto out;

	if (*next != '@')
		die();

	p = next + 1;
	...

> +
> +	addr = strtoll(p, &next, 0);
> +	if (next == p)
> +		die("Invalid memory address");
> +
> +#ifndef ARCH_SUPPORT_CFG_RAM_BASE
> +	if (addr != INVALID_MEM_ADDR)

Should this #ifndef cover more of the parsing routine? It looks a bit weird to first do all the work and then throw it away.
And can we somehow avoid the #ifdef at all? Maybe replacing it with a proper "if" statement? To integrate into the conditions above:
	if (!IS_ENABLED(ARCH_SUPPORT_CFG_RAM_BASE) || *next != '@')
		die();

Cheers,
Andre.

> +		die("Specifying the memory address not supported by the architecture");
> +#endif
> +
> +out:
> +	cfg->ram_base = addr;
> +	cfg->ram_size = size;
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
>  #ifndef OPT_ARCH_RUN
>  #define OPT_ARCH_RUN(...)
>  #endif
> @@ -97,8 +135,11 @@ void kvm_run_set_wrapper_sandbox(void)
>  	OPT_STRING('\0', "name", &(cfg)->guest_name, "guest name",	\
>  			"A name for the guest"),			\
>  	OPT_INTEGER('c', "cpus", &(cfg)->nrcpus, "Number of CPUs"),	\
> -	OPT_U64('m', "mem", &(cfg)->ram_size, "Virtual machine memory"	\
> -		" size in MB."),					\
> +	OPT_CALLBACK('m', "mem", cfg,					\
> +		     "size[@addr]",					\
> +		     "Virtual machine memory size in MB,"		\
> +		     " optionally starting at <addr>.",			\
> +		     mem_parser, NULL),					\
>  	OPT_CALLBACK('\0', "shmem", NULL,				\
>  		     "[pci:]<addr>:<size>[:handle=<handle>][:create]",	\
>  		     "Share host shmem with guest via pci device",	\
> @@ -531,9 +572,6 @@ static struct kvm *kvm_cmd_run_init(int argc, const char **argv)
>  
>  	if (!kvm->cfg.ram_size)
>  		kvm->cfg.ram_size = get_ram_size(kvm->cfg.nrcpus);
> -	else
> -		/* The user specifies the memory in MB. */
> -		kvm->cfg.ram_size <<= MB_SHIFT;
>  
>  	if (kvm->cfg.ram_size > host_ram_size())
>  		pr_warning("Guest memory size %lluMB exceeds host physical RAM size %lluMB",
> diff --git a/include/kvm/kvm-config.h b/include/kvm/kvm-config.h
> index e0c9ee14e103..76edb54e8bae 100644
> --- a/include/kvm/kvm-config.h
> +++ b/include/kvm/kvm-config.h
> @@ -18,10 +18,13 @@
>  #define MIN_RAM_SIZE_MB		(64ULL)
>  #define MIN_RAM_SIZE_BYTE	(MIN_RAM_SIZE_MB << MB_SHIFT)
>  
> +#define INVALID_MEM_ADDR	(~0ULL)
> +
>  struct kvm_config {
>  	struct kvm_config_arch arch;
>  	struct disk_image_params disk_image[MAX_DISK_IMAGES];
>  	struct vfio_device_params *vfio_devices;
> +	u64 ram_base;
>  	u64 ram_size;		/* Guest memory size, in bytes */
>  	u8  image_count;
>  	u8 num_net_devices;
> diff --git a/kvm.c b/kvm.c
> index 36b238791fc1..55a7465960b0 100644
> --- a/kvm.c
> +++ b/kvm.c
> @@ -160,6 +160,12 @@ struct kvm *kvm__new(void)
>  	kvm->sys_fd = -1;
>  	kvm->vm_fd = -1;
>  
> +	/*
> +	 * Make sure we don't mistake the initialization value 0 for ram_base
> +	 * with an user specifying address 0.
> +	 */
> +	kvm->cfg.ram_base = INVALID_MEM_ADDR;
> +
>  #ifdef KVM_BRLOCK_DEBUG
>  	kvm->brlock_sem = (pthread_rwlock_t) PTHREAD_RWLOCK_INITIALIZER;
>  #endif


  reply	other threads:[~2019-11-07 13:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-09-23 13:35 [PATCH kvmtool 00/16] arm: Allow the user to define the memory layout Alexandru Elisei
2019-09-23 13:35 ` [PATCH kvmtool 01/16] arm: Allow use of hugepage with 16K pagesize host Alexandru Elisei
2019-11-06 16:47   ` Andre Przywara
2019-11-06 17:29     ` Alexandru Elisei
2019-09-23 13:35 ` [PATCH kvmtool 02/16] kvm__arch_init: Don't pass hugetlbfs_path and ram_size in parameter Alexandru Elisei
2019-11-06 16:47   ` Andre Przywara
2019-11-07 10:03     ` Alexandru Elisei
2019-09-23 13:35 ` [PATCH kvmtool 03/16] virtio/scsi: Allow the use of multiple banks Alexandru Elisei
2019-11-06 16:48   ` Andre Przywara
2020-02-05 18:07   ` Suzuki Kuruppassery Poulose
2019-09-23 13:35 ` [PATCH kvmtool 04/16] kvmtool: Add helper to sanitize arch specific KVM configuration Alexandru Elisei
2019-11-06 16:48   ` Andre Przywara
2019-11-07 10:05     ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-02-05 18:16   ` Suzuki Kuruppassery Poulose
2019-09-23 13:35 ` [PATCH kvmtool 05/16] kvmtool: Use MB consistently Alexandru Elisei
2019-11-06 16:49   ` Andre Przywara
2020-02-05 18:17   ` Suzuki Kuruppassery Poulose
2019-09-23 13:35 ` [PATCH kvmtool 06/16] builtin-run.c: Always use ram_size in bytes Alexandru Elisei
2019-11-06 16:49   ` Andre Przywara
2019-11-07 10:08     ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-02-05 19:03   ` Suzuki Kuruppassery Poulose
2019-09-23 13:35 ` [PATCH kvmtool 07/16] arm: Remove redundant define ARM_PCI_CFG_SIZE Alexandru Elisei
2019-11-06 16:49   ` Andre Przywara
2020-02-06 11:49   ` Suzuki Kuruppassery Poulose
2019-09-23 13:35 ` [PATCH kvmtool 08/16] arm: Move anything related to RAM initialization in kvm__init_ram Alexandru Elisei
2019-11-07 13:46   ` Andre Przywara
2019-09-23 13:35 ` [PATCH kvmtool 09/16] arm: Allow the user to specify RAM base address Alexandru Elisei
2019-11-07 13:54   ` Andre Przywara [this message]
2020-02-06 12:20   ` Suzuki Kuruppassery Poulose
2019-09-23 13:35 ` [PATCH kvmtool 10/16] kvmtool: Allow standard size specifiers for memory Alexandru Elisei
2019-11-07 13:55   ` Andre Przywara
2019-09-23 13:35 ` [PATCH kvmtool 11/16] arm/pci: Remove unused ioports Alexandru Elisei
2019-09-23 13:35 ` [PATCH kvmtool 12/16] Fold kvm__init_ram call in kvm__arch_init and rename it Alexandru Elisei
2019-09-23 13:35 ` [PATCH kvmtool 13/16] arm: Allow any base address for RAM Alexandru Elisei
2019-09-23 13:35 ` [PATCH kvmtool 14/16] arm: Move memory related code to memory.c Alexandru Elisei
2019-09-23 13:35 ` [PATCH kvmtool 15/16] kvmtool: Make the size@addr option parser globally visible Alexandru Elisei
2019-09-23 13:35 ` [PATCH kvmtool 16/16] arm: Allow the user to define the MMIO regions Alexandru Elisei
2020-02-05 17:16 ` [PATCH kvmtool 00/16] arm: Allow the user to define the memory layout Will Deacon
2020-02-05 17:18   ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-02-06  9:20     ` Marc Zyngier

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20191107135452.09c2ff38@donnerap.cambridge.arm.com \
    --to=andre.przywara@arm.com \
    --cc=alexandru.elisei@arm.com \
    --cc=julien.grall.oss@gmail.com \
    --cc=julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.