From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82A72C43331 for ; Sat, 9 Nov 2019 20:52:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56A462077C for ; Sat, 9 Nov 2019 20:52:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726467AbfKIUwM (ORCPT ); Sat, 9 Nov 2019 15:52:12 -0500 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:37362 "EHLO mx1.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726383AbfKIUwM (ORCPT ); Sat, 9 Nov 2019 15:52:12 -0500 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.220.254]) by mx1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76C56AE82; Sat, 9 Nov 2019 20:52:11 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 9 Nov 2019 21:52:09 +0100 From: Petr Vorel To: Greg KH Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix backport of f18ddc13af981ce3c7b7f26925f099e7c6929aba Message-ID: <20191109205209.GA11798@x230> Reply-To: Petr Vorel References: <20191108155316.13109-1-pvorel@suse.cz> <20191108160812.GA991932@kroah.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20191108160812.GA991932@kroah.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.12.2 (2019-09-21) Sender: stable-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org Hi Greg, > It's a bit hard to go back in time and modify a patch that is already in > the main linux-stable.git tree like this :) > If we messed up the backport, great, please send a patch I can apply to > the 4.9.y kernel tree with the information in it that I can accept to > resolve this issue. Thanks for info :). I wasn't sure what is role of stable-queue git, that's why I also prepared fix stable-queue. > thanks, > greg k-h Kind regards, Petr