From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 765C3C43331 for ; Tue, 12 Nov 2019 07:49:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41407206A3 for ; Tue, 12 Nov 2019 07:49:17 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linaro.org header.i=@linaro.org header.b="q61JAj3N" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1725944AbfKLHtN (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Nov 2019 02:49:13 -0500 Received: from mail-wm1-f65.google.com ([209.85.128.65]:38086 "EHLO mail-wm1-f65.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725283AbfKLHtM (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Nov 2019 02:49:12 -0500 Received: by mail-wm1-f65.google.com with SMTP id z19so1807005wmk.3 for ; Mon, 11 Nov 2019 23:49:11 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=h+vr6PNUoMDGum6dWz+gtk31tHP3FZ8Tbn4zljQ9/yo=; b=q61JAj3Nv+2bmyX2BElQcE/CdF63fy8UBh9vOX4+5wtt1qU0l+At2fLHtC9V44RrvJ S6gH5dPypoWemgb4AWOp4ne7x9iRQKrBy+64JAkHzq3hw0IrIuXNPeLCM/HqucVOgJyf gGIf1QmA++75IxCNB6yH1fOwcM21UH3GVLy6T9eh/I0vVWwKu6T2GcGPgIGXtm4LERzW ssi8crq8fPSBCgIeaS1/YuVnHf4r45ZuezRy6R9+Q9eH/+rxlhnv+7RW0JZRoHDChMD2 msU6IFnEnoKk0zavHf23UlaOAZd+g3SawOh+uP8cF+7sbAPxEF00AAvhW4PZ8TRZoKo5 cYSw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=h+vr6PNUoMDGum6dWz+gtk31tHP3FZ8Tbn4zljQ9/yo=; b=WQSG0gWolprWiW6HBCoMMyDRRC/6j5Du6VNDDc5f6aKJWeSvztO0BpojK3GPQ45RKy zgzWYalIXBrHNSCr5SrdV76EPOuT9qgZP6g9rWcf8E84FgNPTfPOt6sS6VmvV4dEQJLS mRrITPEhT58c1soo+A7lRWZbQkfD8MxzvK8s4/qVdTroZs3eFtoBr29oiKeNs8AEDaUg bnwNBMknudre8/X6Z4H4vTYaHlejZ/3enEDr/a4uophpmShemvIg7etEQxRjlMCmjuy1 cv/RoE+TsdXw/SebmacYNbMv0oaWiUZaLOZa4kO93C6SzOXb/A2i7QS17vjf4WQzMTkg rzkw== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAX/qy5Ieta5sZG9yfob6otEtkW1SEng56twNCsQZNiLs6wNeV0Z 6awKP1aHKTqcgx0RNnfnsbp6Yw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwvi42Af4KWqn1d+iULQZP4KGlAeWLtnO86KWmu7eJ92YByKkS63dzNtbW62k17evDEBTR+JA== X-Received: by 2002:a1c:39c2:: with SMTP id g185mr2519283wma.88.1573544950426; Mon, 11 Nov 2019 23:49:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost.localdomain (88-147-76-3.dyn.eolo.it. [88.147.76.3]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id f67sm2819974wme.16.2019.11.11.23.49.09 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 11 Nov 2019 23:49:09 -0800 (PST) From: Paolo Valente To: Jens Axboe Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ulf.hansson@linaro.org, linus.walleij@linaro.org, bfq-iosched@googlegroups.com, oleksandr@natalenko.name, Paolo Valente , Chris Evich , Patrick Dung , Thorsten Schubert Subject: [PATCH BUGFIX] block, bfq: deschedule empty bfq_queues not referred by any process Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2019 08:48:56 +0100 Message-Id: <20191112074856.40433-1-paolo.valente@linaro.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.20.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-block-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-block@vger.kernel.org Since commit 3726112ec731 ("block, bfq: re-schedule empty queues if they deserve I/O plugging"), to prevent the service guarantees of a bfq_queue from being violated, the bfq_queue may be left busy, i.e., scheduled for service, even if empty (see comments in __bfq_bfqq_expire() for details). But, if no process will send requests to the bfq_queue any longer, then there is no point in keeping the bfq_queue scheduled for service. In addition, keeping the bfq_queue scheduled for service, but with no process reference any longer, may cause the bfq_queue to be freed when descheduled from service. But this is assumed to never happen, and causes a UAF if it happens. This, in turn, caused crashes [1, 2]. This commit fixes this issue by descheduling an empty bfq_queue when it remains with not process reference. [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1767539 [2] https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=205447 Fixes: 3726112ec731 ("block, bfq: re-schedule empty queues if they deserve I/O plugging") Reported-by: Chris Evich Reported-by: Patrick Dung Reported-by: Thorsten Schubert Signed-off-by: Paolo Valente --- block/bfq-iosched.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++------ 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/block/bfq-iosched.c b/block/bfq-iosched.c index 0319d6339822..ba68627f7740 100644 --- a/block/bfq-iosched.c +++ b/block/bfq-iosched.c @@ -2713,6 +2713,27 @@ static void bfq_bfqq_save_state(struct bfq_queue *bfqq) } } + +static +void bfq_release_process_ref(struct bfq_data *bfqd, struct bfq_queue *bfqq) +{ + /* + * To prevent bfqq's service guarantees from being violated, + * bfqq may be left busy, i.e., queued for service, even if + * empty (see comments in __bfq_bfqq_expire() for + * details). But, if no process will send requests to bfqq any + * longer, then there is no point in keeping bfqq queued for + * service. In addition, keeping bfqq queued for service, but + * with no process ref any longer, may have caused bfqq to be + * freed when dequeued from service. But this is assumed to + * never happen. + */ + if (bfq_bfqq_busy(bfqq) && RB_EMPTY_ROOT(&bfqq->sort_list)) + bfq_del_bfqq_busy(bfqd, bfqq, false); + + bfq_put_queue(bfqq); +} + static void bfq_merge_bfqqs(struct bfq_data *bfqd, struct bfq_io_cq *bic, struct bfq_queue *bfqq, struct bfq_queue *new_bfqq) @@ -2783,8 +2804,7 @@ bfq_merge_bfqqs(struct bfq_data *bfqd, struct bfq_io_cq *bic, */ new_bfqq->pid = -1; bfqq->bic = NULL; - /* release process reference to bfqq */ - bfq_put_queue(bfqq); + bfq_release_process_ref(bfqd, bfqq); } static bool bfq_allow_bio_merge(struct request_queue *q, struct request *rq, @@ -4899,7 +4919,7 @@ static void bfq_exit_bfqq(struct bfq_data *bfqd, struct bfq_queue *bfqq) bfq_put_cooperator(bfqq); - bfq_put_queue(bfqq); /* release process reference */ + bfq_release_process_ref(bfqd, bfqq); } static void bfq_exit_icq_bfqq(struct bfq_io_cq *bic, bool is_sync) @@ -5001,8 +5021,7 @@ static void bfq_check_ioprio_change(struct bfq_io_cq *bic, struct bio *bio) bfqq = bic_to_bfqq(bic, false); if (bfqq) { - /* release process reference on this queue */ - bfq_put_queue(bfqq); + bfq_release_process_ref(bfqd, bfqq); bfqq = bfq_get_queue(bfqd, bio, BLK_RW_ASYNC, bic); bic_set_bfqq(bic, bfqq, false); } @@ -5963,7 +5982,7 @@ bfq_split_bfqq(struct bfq_io_cq *bic, struct bfq_queue *bfqq) bfq_put_cooperator(bfqq); - bfq_put_queue(bfqq); + bfq_release_process_ref(bfqq->bfqd, bfqq); return NULL; } -- 2.20.1