> On Fri, 15 Nov 2019 21:01:38 +0200 > Lorenzo Bianconi wrote: > > > static bool __page_pool_recycle_into_ring(struct page_pool *pool, > > - struct page *page) > > + struct page *page, > > + unsigned int dma_sync_size) > > { > > int ret; > > /* BH protection not needed if current is serving softirq */ > > @@ -264,6 +285,9 @@ static bool __page_pool_recycle_into_ring(struct page_pool *pool, > > else > > ret = ptr_ring_produce_bh(&pool->ring, page); > > > > + if (ret == 0 && (pool->p.flags & PP_FLAG_DMA_SYNC_DEV)) > > + page_pool_dma_sync_for_device(pool, page, dma_sync_size); > > + > > return (ret == 0) ? true : false; > > } > > > I do wonder if we should DMA-sync-for-device BEFORE putting page into > ptr_ring, as this is a channel between several concurrent CPUs. Hi Jesper, in this way we can end up syncing the DMA page even if it is unmapped in __page_pool_clean_page (e.g. if the ptr_ring is full), right? > > > > > @@ -273,18 +297,22 @@ static bool __page_pool_recycle_into_ring(struct page_pool *pool, > > * Caller must provide appropriate safe context. > > */ > > static bool __page_pool_recycle_direct(struct page *page, > > - struct page_pool *pool) > > + struct page_pool *pool, > > + unsigned int dma_sync_size) > > { > > if (unlikely(pool->alloc.count == PP_ALLOC_CACHE_SIZE)) > > return false; > > > > /* Caller MUST have verified/know (page_ref_count(page) == 1) */ > > pool->alloc.cache[pool->alloc.count++] = page; > > + > > + if (pool->p.flags & PP_FLAG_DMA_SYNC_DEV) > > + page_pool_dma_sync_for_device(pool, page, dma_sync_size); > > return true; > > } > > We know __page_pool_recycle_direct() is concurrency safe, and only a > single (NAPI processing) CPU can enter. (So, the DMA-sync order is not > wrong here, but it could be swapped) do you mean move it before putting the page in the cache? pool->alloc.cache[pool->alloc.count++] = page; Regards, Lorenzo > > -- > Best regards, > Jesper Dangaard Brouer > MSc.CS, Principal Kernel Engineer at Red Hat > LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/brouer >