On Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 11:05:55AM +0800, chenxiang (M) wrote: > Hi Ming, > > 在 2019/11/19 9:42, Ming Lei 写道: > > On Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 09:25:30AM +0800, chenxiang (M) wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > There are 128 cpus and 16 irqs for SAS controller in my system, and there > > > are 4 Nodes, every 32 cpus are for one node (cpu0-31 for node0, cpu32-63 for > > > node1, cpu64-95 for node2, cpu96-127 for node3). > > > We use function pci_alloc_irq_vectors_affinity() to set the affinity of > > > irqs. > > > > > > I find that before the patch (Fixes: b1a5a73e64e9 ("genirq/affinity: Spread > > > vectors on node according to nr_cpu ratio")), the relationship between irqs > > > and cpus is: irq0 bind to cpu0-7, irq1 bind to cpu8-15, > > > irq2 bind to cpu16-23, irq3 bind to cpu24-31,irq4 bind to cpu32-39... irq15 > > > bind to cpu120-127. But after the patch, the relationship is changed: irq0 > > > bind to cpu32-39, > > > irq1 bind to cpu40-47, ..., irq11 bind to cpu120-127, irq12 bind to cpu0-7, > > > irq13 bind to cpu8-15, irq14 bind to cpu16-23, irq15 bind to cpu24-31. > > > > > > I notice that before calling the sort() in function alloc_nodes_vectors(), > > > the id of array node_vectors[] is from 0,1,2,3. But after function sort(), > > > the index of array node_vectors[] is 1,2,3,0. > > > But i think it sorts according to the numbers of cpus in those nodes, so it > > > should be the same as before calling sort() as the numbers of cpus in every > > > node are 32. > > Maybe there are more non-present CPUs covered by node 0. > > > > Could you provide the following log? > > > > 1) lscpu > > > > 2) ./dump-io-irq-affinity $PCI_ID_SAS > > > > http://people.redhat.com/minlei/tests/tools/dump-io-irq-affinity > > > > You need to figure out the PCI ID(the 1st column of lspci output) of the SAS > > controller via lspci. > > Sorry, I can't access the link you provide, but i can provide those irqs' > affinity in the attachment. > I also write a small testcase, and find id is 1, 2, 3, 0 after calling > sort() . Runtime log from /proc/interrupts isn't useful for investigating affinity allocation issue, please use the attached script for collecting log. Thanks, Ming