From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD226C432C0 for ; Wed, 27 Nov 2019 09:59:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A1A02070A for ; Wed, 27 Nov 2019 09:59:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726520AbfK0J7X (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Nov 2019 04:59:23 -0500 Received: from baptiste.telenet-ops.be ([195.130.132.51]:52232 "EHLO baptiste.telenet-ops.be" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726227AbfK0J7X (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Nov 2019 04:59:23 -0500 Received: from ramsan ([84.195.182.253]) by baptiste.telenet-ops.be with bizsmtp id WxzL2100c5USYZQ01xzL2C; Wed, 27 Nov 2019 10:59:20 +0100 Received: from rox.of.borg ([192.168.97.57]) by ramsan with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iZu6S-0001tZ-L5; Wed, 27 Nov 2019 10:59:20 +0100 Received: from geert by rox.of.borg with local (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iZu6S-00016h-IZ; Wed, 27 Nov 2019 10:59:20 +0100 From: Geert Uytterhoeven To: Linus Walleij , Bartosz Golaszewski , Alexandre Courbot Cc: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Geert Uytterhoeven Subject: [PATCH] gpiolib: Fix error message on out-of-range GPIO in lookup table Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2019 10:59:19 +0100 Message-Id: <20191127095919.4214-1-geert+renesas@glider.be> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.1 Sender: linux-gpio-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org When a GPIO offset in a lookup table is out-of-range, the printed error message (1) does not include the actual out-of-range value, and (2) contains an off-by-one error in the upper bound. Avoid user confusion by also printing the actual GPIO offset, and correcting the upper bound of the range. While at it, use "%u" for unsigned int. Sample impact: -requested GPIO 0 is out of range [0..32] for chip e6052000.gpio +requested GPIO 0 (45) is out of range [0..31] for chip e6052000.gpio Fixes: 2a3cf6a3599e9015 ("gpiolib: return -ENOENT if no GPIO mapping exists") Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven --- drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c | 5 +++-- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c index 9913886ede904bb0..dce0b31f4125a6b3 100644 --- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c @@ -4472,8 +4472,9 @@ static struct gpio_desc *gpiod_find(struct device *dev, const char *con_id, if (chip->ngpio <= p->chip_hwnum) { dev_err(dev, - "requested GPIO %d is out of range [0..%d] for chip %s\n", - idx, chip->ngpio, chip->label); + "requested GPIO %u (%u) is out of range [0..%u] for chip %s\n", + idx, p->chip_hwnum, chip->ngpio - 1, + chip->label); return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL); } -- 2.17.1