All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com>
To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Cc: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>, Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>,
	Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>,
	Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@wdc.com>,
	Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de>,
	Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.com>,
	Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com>
Subject: [PATCH v5 09/28] btrfs: align device extent allocation to zone boundary
Date: Wed,  4 Dec 2019 17:17:16 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191204081735.852438-10-naohiro.aota@wdc.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191204081735.852438-1-naohiro.aota@wdc.com>

In HMZONED mode, align the device extents to zone boundaries so that a zone
reset affects only the device extent and does not change the state of
blocks in the neighbor device extents. Also, check that a region allocation
is always over empty zones and it is not over any locations of super block
zones.

This patch also add a verification in verify_one_dev_extent() to check if
the device extent is align to zone boundary.

Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com>
---
 fs/btrfs/hmzoned.c | 55 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 fs/btrfs/hmzoned.h | 15 +++++++++
 fs/btrfs/volumes.c | 77 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 147 insertions(+)

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/hmzoned.c b/fs/btrfs/hmzoned.c
index 599c493f44b0..9a814ad1b0a5 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/hmzoned.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/hmzoned.c
@@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
 #include "volumes.h"
 #include "hmzoned.h"
 #include "rcu-string.h"
+#include "disk-io.h"
 
 /* Maximum number of zones to report per blkdev_report_zones() call */
 #define BTRFS_REPORT_NR_ZONES   4096
@@ -553,3 +554,57 @@ int btrfs_reset_sb_log_zones(struct block_device *bdev, int mirror)
 				  zone_sectors * 2,
 				  GFP_NOFS);
 }
+
+/*
+ * btrfs_check_allocatable_zones - check if spcecifeid region is
+ *                                 suitable for allocation
+ * @device:	the device to allocate a region
+ * @pos:	the position of the region
+ * @num_bytes:	the size of the region
+ *
+ * In non-ZONED device, anywhere is suitable for allocation. In ZONED
+ * device, check if
+ * 1) the region is not on non-empty sequential zones,
+ * 2) all zones in the region have the same zone type,
+ * 3) it does not contain super block location.
+ */
+bool btrfs_check_allocatable_zones(struct btrfs_device *device, u64 pos,
+				   u64 num_bytes)
+{
+	struct btrfs_zoned_device_info *zinfo = device->zone_info;
+	u64 nzones, begin, end;
+	u64 sb_pos;
+	u8 shift;
+	int i;
+
+	if (!zinfo)
+		return true;
+
+	shift = zinfo->zone_size_shift;
+	nzones = num_bytes >> shift;
+	begin = pos >> shift;
+	end = begin + nzones;
+
+	ASSERT(IS_ALIGNED(pos, zinfo->zone_size));
+	ASSERT(IS_ALIGNED(num_bytes, zinfo->zone_size));
+
+	if (end > zinfo->nr_zones)
+		return false;
+
+	/* check if zones in the region are all empty */
+	if (btrfs_dev_is_sequential(device, pos) &&
+	    find_next_zero_bit(zinfo->empty_zones, end, begin) != end)
+		return false;
+
+	if (btrfs_dev_is_sequential(device, pos)) {
+		for (i = 0; i < BTRFS_SUPER_MIRROR_MAX; i++) {
+			sb_pos = sb_zone_number(zinfo->zone_size, i);
+			if (!(end < sb_pos || sb_pos + 1 < begin))
+				return false;
+		}
+
+		return find_next_zero_bit(zinfo->seq_zones, end, begin) == end;
+	}
+
+	return find_next_bit(zinfo->seq_zones, end, begin) == end;
+}
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/hmzoned.h b/fs/btrfs/hmzoned.h
index 55041a26ae3c..d54b4ae8cf8b 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/hmzoned.h
+++ b/fs/btrfs/hmzoned.h
@@ -38,6 +38,8 @@ int btrfs_sb_log_location_bdev(struct block_device *bdev, int mirror, int rw,
 u64 btrfs_sb_log_location(struct btrfs_device *device, int mirror, int rw);
 int btrfs_advance_sb_log(struct btrfs_device *device, int mirror);
 int btrfs_reset_sb_log_zones(struct block_device *bdev, int mirror);
+bool btrfs_check_allocatable_zones(struct btrfs_device *device, u64 pos,
+				   u64 num_bytes);
 #else /* CONFIG_BLK_DEV_ZONED */
 static inline int btrfs_get_dev_zone(struct btrfs_device *device, u64 pos,
 				     struct blk_zone *zone)
@@ -82,6 +84,11 @@ static inline int btrfs_reset_sb_log_zones(struct block_device *bdev,
 {
 	return 0;
 }
+static inline bool btrfs_check_allocatable_zones(struct btrfs_device *device,
+						 u64 pos, u64 num_bytes)
+{
+	return true;
+}
 #endif
 
 static inline bool btrfs_dev_is_sequential(struct btrfs_device *device, u64 pos)
@@ -160,4 +167,12 @@ static inline bool btrfs_check_super_location(struct btrfs_device *device,
 		!btrfs_dev_is_sequential(device, pos);
 }
 
+static inline u64 btrfs_zone_align(struct btrfs_device *device, u64 pos)
+{
+	if (!device->zone_info)
+		return pos;
+
+	return ALIGN(pos, device->zone_info->zone_size);
+}
+
 #endif
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
index a260648cecca..d058ea613627 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
@@ -1393,6 +1393,7 @@ static int find_free_dev_extent_start(struct btrfs_device *device,
 	u64 max_hole_size;
 	u64 extent_end;
 	u64 search_end = device->total_bytes;
+	u64 zone_size = 0;
 	int ret;
 	int slot;
 	struct extent_buffer *l;
@@ -1403,6 +1404,14 @@ static int find_free_dev_extent_start(struct btrfs_device *device,
 	 * at an offset of at least 1MB.
 	 */
 	search_start = max_t(u64, search_start, SZ_1M);
+	/*
+	 * For a zoned block device, skip the first zone of the device
+	 * entirely.
+	 */
+	if (device->zone_info)
+		zone_size = device->zone_info->zone_size;
+	search_start = max_t(u64, search_start, zone_size);
+	search_start = btrfs_zone_align(device, search_start);
 
 	path = btrfs_alloc_path();
 	if (!path)
@@ -1467,12 +1476,21 @@ static int find_free_dev_extent_start(struct btrfs_device *device,
 			 */
 			if (contains_pending_extent(device, &search_start,
 						    hole_size)) {
+				search_start = btrfs_zone_align(device,
+								search_start);
 				if (key.offset >= search_start)
 					hole_size = key.offset - search_start;
 				else
 					hole_size = 0;
 			}
 
+			if (!btrfs_check_allocatable_zones(device, search_start,
+							   num_bytes)) {
+				search_start += zone_size;
+				btrfs_release_path(path);
+				goto again;
+			}
+
 			if (hole_size > max_hole_size) {
 				max_hole_start = search_start;
 				max_hole_size = hole_size;
@@ -1512,6 +1530,14 @@ static int find_free_dev_extent_start(struct btrfs_device *device,
 		hole_size = search_end - search_start;
 
 		if (contains_pending_extent(device, &search_start, hole_size)) {
+			search_start = btrfs_zone_align(device, search_start);
+			btrfs_release_path(path);
+			goto again;
+		}
+
+		if (!btrfs_check_allocatable_zones(device, search_start,
+						   num_bytes)) {
+			search_start += zone_size;
 			btrfs_release_path(path);
 			goto again;
 		}
@@ -1529,6 +1555,7 @@ static int find_free_dev_extent_start(struct btrfs_device *device,
 		ret = 0;
 
 out:
+	ASSERT(zone_size == 0 || IS_ALIGNED(max_hole_start, zone_size));
 	btrfs_free_path(path);
 	*start = max_hole_start;
 	if (len)
@@ -4778,6 +4805,7 @@ static int __btrfs_alloc_chunk(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
 	int i;
 	int j;
 	int index;
+	int hmzoned = btrfs_fs_incompat(info, HMZONED);
 
 	BUG_ON(!alloc_profile_is_valid(type, 0));
 
@@ -4819,10 +4847,25 @@ static int __btrfs_alloc_chunk(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
 		BUG();
 	}
 
+	if (hmzoned) {
+		max_stripe_size = info->zone_size;
+		max_chunk_size = round_down(max_chunk_size, info->zone_size);
+	}
+
 	/* We don't want a chunk larger than 10% of writable space */
 	max_chunk_size = min(div_factor(fs_devices->total_rw_bytes, 1),
 			     max_chunk_size);
 
+	if (hmzoned) {
+		int min_num_stripes = devs_min * dev_stripes;
+		int min_data_stripes = (min_num_stripes - nparity) / ncopies;
+		u64 min_chunk_size = min_data_stripes * info->zone_size;
+
+		max_chunk_size = max(round_down(max_chunk_size,
+						info->zone_size),
+				     min_chunk_size);
+	}
+
 	devices_info = kcalloc(fs_devices->rw_devices, sizeof(*devices_info),
 			       GFP_NOFS);
 	if (!devices_info)
@@ -4857,6 +4900,9 @@ static int __btrfs_alloc_chunk(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
 		if (total_avail == 0)
 			continue;
 
+		if (hmzoned && total_avail < max_stripe_size * dev_stripes)
+			continue;
+
 		ret = find_free_dev_extent(device,
 					   max_stripe_size * dev_stripes,
 					   &dev_offset, &max_avail);
@@ -4875,6 +4921,9 @@ static int __btrfs_alloc_chunk(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
 			continue;
 		}
 
+		if (hmzoned && max_avail < max_stripe_size * dev_stripes)
+			continue;
+
 		if (ndevs == fs_devices->rw_devices) {
 			WARN(1, "%s: found more than %llu devices\n",
 			     __func__, fs_devices->rw_devices);
@@ -4893,6 +4942,7 @@ static int __btrfs_alloc_chunk(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
 	sort(devices_info, ndevs, sizeof(struct btrfs_device_info),
 	     btrfs_cmp_device_info, NULL);
 
+again:
 	/*
 	 * Round down to number of usable stripes, devs_increment can be any
 	 * number so we can't use round_down()
@@ -4934,6 +4984,17 @@ static int __btrfs_alloc_chunk(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
 	 * we try to reduce stripe_size.
 	 */
 	if (stripe_size * data_stripes > max_chunk_size) {
+		if (hmzoned) {
+			/*
+			 * stripe_size is fixed in HMZONED. Reduce ndevs
+			 * instead.
+			 */
+			ASSERT(nparity == 0);
+			ndevs = div_u64(max_chunk_size * ncopies,
+					stripe_size * dev_stripes);
+			goto again;
+		}
+
 		/*
 		 * Reduce stripe_size, round it up to a 16MB boundary again and
 		 * then use it, unless it ends up being even bigger than the
@@ -4947,6 +5008,8 @@ static int __btrfs_alloc_chunk(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
 	/* align to BTRFS_STRIPE_LEN */
 	stripe_size = round_down(stripe_size, BTRFS_STRIPE_LEN);
 
+	ASSERT(!hmzoned || stripe_size == info->zone_size);
+
 	map = kmalloc(map_lookup_size(num_stripes), GFP_NOFS);
 	if (!map) {
 		ret = -ENOMEM;
@@ -7541,6 +7604,20 @@ static int verify_one_dev_extent(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
 		ret = -EUCLEAN;
 		goto out;
 	}
+
+	if (dev->zone_info) {
+		u64 zone_size = dev->zone_info->zone_size;
+
+		if (!IS_ALIGNED(physical_offset, zone_size) ||
+		    !IS_ALIGNED(physical_len, zone_size)) {
+			btrfs_err(fs_info,
+"dev extent devid %llu physical offset %llu len %llu is not aligned to device zone",
+				  devid, physical_offset, physical_len);
+			ret = -EUCLEAN;
+			goto out;
+		}
+	}
+
 out:
 	free_extent_map(em);
 	return ret;
-- 
2.24.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-12-04  8:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-12-04  8:17 [PATCH v5 00/28] btrfs: zoned block device support Naohiro Aota
2019-12-04  8:17 ` [PATCH v5 01/28] btrfs: introduce HMZONED feature flag Naohiro Aota
2019-12-04  8:17 ` [PATCH v5 02/28] btrfs: Get zone information of zoned block devices Naohiro Aota
2019-12-04 15:37   ` Johannes Thumshirn
2019-12-04 17:22     ` David Sterba
2019-12-05  6:29       ` Naohiro Aota
2019-12-05  6:28     ` Naohiro Aota
2019-12-07  9:47   ` Anand Jain
2019-12-10  4:41     ` Naohiro Aota
2019-12-04  8:17 ` [PATCH v5 03/28] btrfs: Check and enable HMZONED mode Naohiro Aota
2019-12-04 16:07   ` Johannes Thumshirn
2019-12-05  5:17     ` Naohiro Aota
2019-12-05 15:28       ` David Sterba
2019-12-04  8:17 ` [PATCH v5 04/28] btrfs: disallow RAID5/6 in " Naohiro Aota
2019-12-04  8:17 ` [PATCH v5 05/28] btrfs: disallow space_cache " Naohiro Aota
2019-12-05  7:21   ` Johannes Thumshirn
2019-12-05 15:39   ` David Sterba
2019-12-06  5:32     ` Naohiro Aota
2019-12-06 15:12       ` David Sterba
2019-12-04  8:17 ` [PATCH v5 06/28] btrfs: disallow NODATACOW " Naohiro Aota
2019-12-05  7:58   ` Johannes Thumshirn
2019-12-05 15:31   ` David Sterba
2019-12-06  5:37     ` Naohiro Aota
2019-12-04  8:17 ` [PATCH v5 07/28] btrfs: disable fallocate " Naohiro Aota
2019-12-05  8:00   ` Johannes Thumshirn
2019-12-04  8:17 ` [PATCH v5 08/28] btrfs: implement log-structured superblock for " Naohiro Aota
2019-12-04  8:17 ` Naohiro Aota [this message]
2019-12-05  8:56   ` [PATCH v5 09/28] btrfs: align device extent allocation to zone boundary Johannes Thumshirn
2019-12-06  5:45     ` Naohiro Aota
2019-12-04  8:17 ` [PATCH v5 10/28] btrfs: do sequential extent allocation in HMZONED mode Naohiro Aota
2019-12-04  8:17 ` [PATCH v5 11/28] btrfs: make unmirroed BGs readonly only if we have at least one writable BG Naohiro Aota
2019-12-04  8:17 ` [PATCH v5 12/28] btrfs: ensure metadata space available on/after degraded mount in HMZONED Naohiro Aota
2019-12-04  8:17 ` [PATCH v5 13/28] btrfs: reset zones of unused block groups Naohiro Aota
2019-12-04  8:17 ` [PATCH v5 14/28] btrfs: redirty released extent buffers in HMZONED mode Naohiro Aota
2019-12-04  8:17 ` [PATCH v5 15/28] btrfs: serialize data allocation and submit IOs Naohiro Aota
2019-12-04  8:17 ` [PATCH v5 16/28] btrfs: implement atomic compressed IO submission Naohiro Aota
2019-12-04  8:17 ` [PATCH v5 17/28] btrfs: support direct write IO in HMZONED Naohiro Aota
2019-12-04  8:17 ` [PATCH v5 18/28] btrfs: serialize meta IOs on HMZONED mode Naohiro Aota
2019-12-04  8:17 ` [PATCH v5 19/28] btrfs: wait existing extents before truncating Naohiro Aota
2019-12-04  8:17 ` [PATCH v5 20/28] btrfs: avoid async checksum on HMZONED mode Naohiro Aota
2019-12-04  8:17 ` [PATCH v5 21/28] btrfs: disallow mixed-bg in " Naohiro Aota
2019-12-04  8:17 ` [PATCH v5 22/28] btrfs: disallow inode_cache " Naohiro Aota
2019-12-04  8:17 ` [PATCH v5 23/28] btrfs: support dev-replace " Naohiro Aota
2019-12-04  8:17 ` [PATCH v5 24/28] btrfs: enable relocation " Naohiro Aota
2019-12-04  8:17 ` [PATCH v5 25/28] btrfs: relocate block group to repair IO failure in HMZONED Naohiro Aota
2019-12-04  8:17 ` [PATCH v5 26/28] btrfs: split alloc_log_tree() Naohiro Aota
2019-12-04  8:17 ` [PATCH v5 27/28] btrfs: enable tree-log on HMZONED mode Naohiro Aota
2019-12-04  8:17 ` [PATCH v5 28/28] btrfs: enable to mount HMZONED incompat flag Naohiro Aota

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20191204081735.852438-10-naohiro.aota@wdc.com \
    --to=naohiro.aota@wdc.com \
    --cc=anand.jain@oracle.com \
    --cc=clm@fb.com \
    --cc=damien.lemoal@wdc.com \
    --cc=dsterba@suse.com \
    --cc=hare@suse.com \
    --cc=josef@toxicpanda.com \
    --cc=jthumshirn@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nborisov@suse.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.