From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: AKASHI Takahiro Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2019 17:28:59 +0900 Subject: [PATCH v2 00/16] efi_loader: add secure boot support In-Reply-To: <29c8db0b-15eb-7285-dc72-0de54f2cbe12@gmx.de> References: <20191126005120.31156-1-takahiro.akashi@linaro.org> <20191204024314.GW22427@linaro.org> <29c8db0b-15eb-7285-dc72-0de54f2cbe12@gmx.de> Message-ID: <20191204082858.GX22427@linaro.org> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de On Wed, Dec 04, 2019 at 08:31:26AM +0100, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote: > On 12/4/19 3:43 AM, AKASHI Takahiro wrote: > >Tom, Simon, Heinrich, > > > >I have submitted three major patch sets for UEFI secure boot: > >* x509/pkcs7 parser > >* RSA library extension > >* UEFI secure boot > > > >I have no technical issues to fix now and have seen only a few minor > >comments on them (if I confirm that you have no more comments, > >I can submit new version almost immediately). > >Considering those, can I expect that those patches be merged > >in v2020.01? > > > >If not, do you need to have more time for your reviewing? > >What else do you expect from my side to accelerate the upstream? > > We are reaching the end of the release cycle. So do not expect any of > these patch series to be merged in v2020.01. > cf. https://www.denx.de/wiki/U-Boot/ReleaseCycle I have often seen several patches (not bug fix) merged even after "merge window". Anyway, > To my understanding the UEFI secure boot series depends on the other two > so it must be merged last. So once the first two patch set are accepted by the maintainers, do you agree to merging the third one (i.e. secure boot patch itself) promptly? -> Heinrich As I said, I have had no technical issues on the first two patches and haven't heard any comments/objections from the maintainers so far. Are you willing to accept them for the next release? -> Tom, Simon Thanks, -Takahiro Akashi > > Heinrich