From: Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Cc: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 03/14] net: sfp: add more extended compliance codes
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2019 17:21:31 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191210172130.GX25745@shell.armlinux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191210165716.GI27714@lunn.ch>
On Tue, Dec 10, 2019 at 05:57:16PM +0100, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 09, 2019 at 03:18:39PM +0000, Russell King wrote:
> > SFF-8024 is used to define various constants re-used in several SFF
> > SFP-related specifications. Split these constants from the enum, and
> > rename them to indicate that they're defined by SFF-8024.
> >
> > Add and use updated SFF-8024 extended compliance code definitions for
> > 10GBASE-T, 5GBASE-T and 2.5GBASE-T modules.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>
>
> > + case SFF8024_CONNECTOR_SG: /* guess */
>
> Does SFF8024 say anything about this, or is it still a guess?
SFF-8024 doesn't describe the connectors. It just gives a table:
09h MU (Multiple Optical)
0Ah SG
0Bh Optical Pigtail
0Ch MPO 1x12 (Multifiber Parallel Optic)
Searching for "SFP SG connector" or "fiber SG connector" on google
doesn't provide anything useful. So yes, it remains a guess until
someone can say what it actually is.
--
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line in suburbia: sync at 12.1Mbps down 622kbps up
According to speedtest.net: 11.9Mbps down 500kbps up
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-12-10 17:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-12-09 15:15 [PATCH net-next v2 00/14] Add support for SFP+ copper modules Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2019-12-09 15:18 ` [PATCH net-next v2 01/14] net: sfp: remove incomplete 100BASE-FX and 100BASE-LX support Russell King
2019-12-10 16:52 ` Andrew Lunn
2019-12-09 15:18 ` [PATCH net-next v2 02/14] net: sfp: derive interface mode from ethtool link modes Russell King
2019-12-10 16:53 ` Andrew Lunn
2019-12-09 15:18 ` [PATCH net-next v2 03/14] net: sfp: add more extended compliance codes Russell King
2019-12-10 16:57 ` Andrew Lunn
2019-12-10 17:21 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin [this message]
2019-12-09 15:18 ` [PATCH net-next v2 04/14] net: sfp: add module start/stop upstream notifications Russell King
2019-12-10 16:59 ` Andrew Lunn
2019-12-09 15:18 ` [PATCH net-next v2 05/14] net: sfp: move phy_start()/phy_stop() to phylink Russell King
2019-12-10 17:00 ` Andrew Lunn
2019-12-09 15:18 ` [PATCH net-next v2 06/14] net: mdio-i2c: add support for Clause 45 accesses Russell King
2019-12-10 17:05 ` Andrew Lunn
2019-12-09 15:19 ` [PATCH net-next v2 07/14] net: phylink: re-split __phylink_connect_phy() Russell King
2019-12-10 17:06 ` Andrew Lunn
2019-12-09 15:19 ` [PATCH net-next v2 08/14] net: phylink: support Clause 45 PHYs on SFP+ modules Russell King
2019-12-10 17:07 ` Andrew Lunn
2019-12-09 15:19 ` [PATCH net-next v2 09/14] net: phylink: split link_an_mode configured and current settings Russell King
2019-12-10 17:09 ` Andrew Lunn
2019-12-09 15:19 ` [PATCH net-next v2 10/14] net: phylink: split phylink_sfp_module_insert() Russell King
2019-12-10 17:10 ` Andrew Lunn
2019-12-09 15:19 ` [PATCH net-next v2 11/14] net: phylink: delay MAC configuration for copper SFP modules Russell King
2019-12-10 17:14 ` Andrew Lunn
2019-12-09 15:19 ` [PATCH net-next v2 12/14] net: phylink: make Broadcom BCM84881 based SFPs work Russell King
2019-12-10 17:32 ` Florian Fainelli
2019-12-09 15:19 ` [PATCH net-next v2 13/14] net: phy: add Broadcom BCM84881 PHY driver Russell King
2019-12-10 17:34 ` Florian Fainelli
2019-12-10 17:58 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2019-12-10 18:46 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2019-12-19 0:55 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2019-12-19 0:57 ` Florian Fainelli
2019-12-09 15:19 ` [PATCH net-next v2 14/14] net: sfp: add support for Clause 45 PHYs Russell King
2019-12-10 17:21 ` Andrew Lunn
2019-12-11 1:23 ` [PATCH net-next v2 00/14] Add support for SFP+ copper modules David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191210172130.GX25745@shell.armlinux.org.uk \
--to=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.