[Patch v3 0/3] ARM: dts: am43x-vpfe/ov2659.patch

[Patch v3 0/3] ARM: dts: am43x-vpfe/ov2659.patch

[Benoit Parrot]

This patch series adds the missing camera endpoint (ov2659) as well as
the required source clocks nodes for the sensor.

On the am437x-sk-evm the camera sensor is sourced from clkout1 but that
clock nodes/tree was removed as it was unsed at the time, we are
re-adding the needed clock nodes here.

Changes since v2:
- Fixed/added Tony's ack

Changes since v1:
- Fix clock name to make it generic
- Add non-standard clock node naming to commit message as per Tony's
  comment
- Rename all clock nodes to use '-' instead of '_'

Benoit Parrot (2):
  ARM: dts: am437x-sk-evm: Add VPFE and OV2659 entries
  ARM: dts: am43x-epos-evm: Add VPFE and OV2659 entries

Tero Kristo (1):
  ARM: dts: am43xx: add support for clkout1 clock

 arch/arm/boot/dts/am437x-sk-evm.dts  | 27 +++++++++++++-
 arch/arm/boot/dts/am43x-epos-evm.dts | 23 +++++++++++-
 arch/arm/boot/dts/am43xx-clocks.dtsi | 54 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 102 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

-- 
2.17.1

[Patch v3 0/3] ARM: dts: am43x-vpfe/ov2659.patch

[Benoit Parrot]

This patch series adds the missing camera endpoint (ov2659) as well as
the required source clocks nodes for the sensor.

On the am437x-sk-evm the camera sensor is sourced from clkout1 but that
clock nodes/tree was removed as it was unsed at the time, we are
re-adding the needed clock nodes here.

Changes since v2:
- Fixed/added Tony's ack

Changes since v1:
- Fix clock name to make it generic
- Add non-standard clock node naming to commit message as per Tony's
  comment
- Rename all clock nodes to use '-' instead of '_'

Benoit Parrot (2):
  ARM: dts: am437x-sk-evm: Add VPFE and OV2659 entries
  ARM: dts: am43x-epos-evm: Add VPFE and OV2659 entries

Tero Kristo (1):
  ARM: dts: am43xx: add support for clkout1 clock

 arch/arm/boot/dts/am437x-sk-evm.dts  | 27 +++++++++++++-
 arch/arm/boot/dts/am43x-epos-evm.dts | 23 +++++++++++-
 arch/arm/boot/dts/am43xx-clocks.dtsi | 54 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 102 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

-- 
2.17.1

[Patch v3 1/3] ARM: dts: am43xx: add support for clkout1 clock

[Benoit Parrot]

From: Tero Kristo <t-kristo@ti.com>

clkout1 clock node and its generation tree was missing. Add this based
on the data on TRM and PRCM functional spec.

commit 664ae1ab2536 ("ARM: dts: am43xx: add clkctrl nodes") effectively
reverted this commit 8010f13a40d3 ("ARM: dts: am43xx: add support for
clkout1 clock") which is needed for the ov2659 camera sensor clock
definition hence it is being re-applied here.

Note that because of the current dts node name dependency for mapping to
clock domain, we must still use "clkout1-*ck" naming instead of generic
"clock@" naming for the node. And because of this, it's probably best to
apply the dts node addition together along with the other clock changes.

Fixes: 664ae1ab2536 ("ARM: dts: am43xx: add clkctrl nodes")
Signed-off-by: Tero Kristo <t-kristo@ti.com>
Tested-by: Benoit Parrot <bparrot@ti.com>
Acked-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Signed-off-by: Benoit Parrot <bparrot@ti.com>
---
 arch/arm/boot/dts/am43xx-clocks.dtsi | 54 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 54 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/am43xx-clocks.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/am43xx-clocks.dtsi
index 091356f2a8c1..c726cd8dbdf1 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/am43xx-clocks.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/am43xx-clocks.dtsi
@@ -704,6 +704,60 @@
 		ti,bit-shift = <8>;
 		reg = <0x2a48>;
 	};
+
+	clkout1_osc_div_ck: clkout1-osc-div-ck {
+		#clock-cells = <0>;
+		compatible = "ti,divider-clock";
+		clocks = <&sys_clkin_ck>;
+		ti,bit-shift = <20>;
+		ti,max-div = <4>;
+		reg = <0x4100>;
+	};
+
+	clkout1_src2_mux_ck: clkout1-src2-mux-ck {
+		#clock-cells = <0>;
+		compatible = "ti,mux-clock";
+		clocks = <&clk_rc32k_ck>, <&sysclk_div>, <&dpll_ddr_m2_ck>,
+			 <&dpll_per_m2_ck>, <&dpll_disp_m2_ck>,
+			 <&dpll_mpu_m2_ck>;
+		reg = <0x4100>;
+	};
+
+	clkout1_src2_pre_div_ck: clkout1-src2-pre-div-ck {
+		#clock-cells = <0>;
+		compatible = "ti,divider-clock";
+		clocks = <&clkout1_src2_mux_ck>;
+		ti,bit-shift = <4>;
+		ti,max-div = <8>;
+		reg = <0x4100>;
+	};
+
+	clkout1_src2_post_div_ck: clkout1-src2-post-div-ck {
+		#clock-cells = <0>;
+		compatible = "ti,divider-clock";
+		clocks = <&clkout1_src2_pre_div_ck>;
+		ti,bit-shift = <8>;
+		ti,max-div = <32>;
+		ti,index-power-of-two;
+		reg = <0x4100>;
+	};
+
+	clkout1_mux_ck: clkout1-mux-ck {
+		#clock-cells = <0>;
+		compatible = "ti,mux-clock";
+		clocks = <&clkout1_osc_div_ck>, <&clk_rc32k_ck>,
+			 <&clkout1_src2_post_div_ck>, <&dpll_extdev_m2_ck>;
+		ti,bit-shift = <16>;
+		reg = <0x4100>;
+	};
+
+	clkout1_ck: clkout1-ck {
+		#clock-cells = <0>;
+		compatible = "ti,gate-clock";
+		clocks = <&clkout1_mux_ck>;
+		ti,bit-shift = <23>;
+		reg = <0x4100>;
+	};
 };
 
 &prcm {
-- 
2.17.1

[Patch v3 1/3] ARM: dts: am43xx: add support for clkout1 clock

[Benoit Parrot]

From: Tero Kristo <t-kristo@ti.com>

clkout1 clock node and its generation tree was missing. Add this based
on the data on TRM and PRCM functional spec.

commit 664ae1ab2536 ("ARM: dts: am43xx: add clkctrl nodes") effectively
reverted this commit 8010f13a40d3 ("ARM: dts: am43xx: add support for
clkout1 clock") which is needed for the ov2659 camera sensor clock
definition hence it is being re-applied here.

Note that because of the current dts node name dependency for mapping to
clock domain, we must still use "clkout1-*ck" naming instead of generic
"clock@" naming for the node. And because of this, it's probably best to
apply the dts node addition together along with the other clock changes.

Fixes: 664ae1ab2536 ("ARM: dts: am43xx: add clkctrl nodes")
Signed-off-by: Tero Kristo <t-kristo@ti.com>
Tested-by: Benoit Parrot <bparrot@ti.com>
Acked-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Signed-off-by: Benoit Parrot <bparrot@ti.com>
---
 arch/arm/boot/dts/am43xx-clocks.dtsi | 54 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 54 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/am43xx-clocks.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/am43xx-clocks.dtsi
index 091356f2a8c1..c726cd8dbdf1 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/am43xx-clocks.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/am43xx-clocks.dtsi
@@ -704,6 +704,60 @@
 		ti,bit-shift = <8>;
 		reg = <0x2a48>;
 	};
+
+	clkout1_osc_div_ck: clkout1-osc-div-ck {
+		#clock-cells = <0>;
+		compatible = "ti,divider-clock";
+		clocks = <&sys_clkin_ck>;
+		ti,bit-shift = <20>;
+		ti,max-div = <4>;
+		reg = <0x4100>;
+	};
+
+	clkout1_src2_mux_ck: clkout1-src2-mux-ck {
+		#clock-cells = <0>;
+		compatible = "ti,mux-clock";
+		clocks = <&clk_rc32k_ck>, <&sysclk_div>, <&dpll_ddr_m2_ck>,
+			 <&dpll_per_m2_ck>, <&dpll_disp_m2_ck>,
+			 <&dpll_mpu_m2_ck>;
+		reg = <0x4100>;
+	};
+
+	clkout1_src2_pre_div_ck: clkout1-src2-pre-div-ck {
+		#clock-cells = <0>;
+		compatible = "ti,divider-clock";
+		clocks = <&clkout1_src2_mux_ck>;
+		ti,bit-shift = <4>;
+		ti,max-div = <8>;
+		reg = <0x4100>;
+	};
+
+	clkout1_src2_post_div_ck: clkout1-src2-post-div-ck {
+		#clock-cells = <0>;
+		compatible = "ti,divider-clock";
+		clocks = <&clkout1_src2_pre_div_ck>;
+		ti,bit-shift = <8>;
+		ti,max-div = <32>;
+		ti,index-power-of-two;
+		reg = <0x4100>;
+	};
+
+	clkout1_mux_ck: clkout1-mux-ck {
+		#clock-cells = <0>;
+		compatible = "ti,mux-clock";
+		clocks = <&clkout1_osc_div_ck>, <&clk_rc32k_ck>,
+			 <&clkout1_src2_post_div_ck>, <&dpll_extdev_m2_ck>;
+		ti,bit-shift = <16>;
+		reg = <0x4100>;
+	};
+
+	clkout1_ck: clkout1-ck {
+		#clock-cells = <0>;
+		compatible = "ti,gate-clock";
+		clocks = <&clkout1_mux_ck>;
+		ti,bit-shift = <23>;
+		reg = <0x4100>;
+	};
 };
 
 &prcm {
-- 
2.17.1

[Patch v3 2/3] ARM: dts: am437x-sk-evm: Add VPFE and OV2659 entries

[Benoit Parrot]

Add VPFE device nodes entries.
Add OmniVision OV2659 sensor device nodes and linkage.

The sensor clock (xvclk) is sourced from clkout1.
Add clock entries to properly select clkout1 and set its parent
clock to sys_clkin_ck.

Signed-off-by: Benoit Parrot <bparrot@ti.com>
---
 arch/arm/boot/dts/am437x-sk-evm.dts | 27 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/am437x-sk-evm.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/am437x-sk-evm.dts
index 74eaa6a3b258..25222497f828 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/am437x-sk-evm.dts
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/am437x-sk-evm.dts
@@ -272,6 +272,12 @@
 		>;
 	};
 
+	clkout1_pin: pinmux_clkout1_pin {
+		pinctrl-single,pins = <
+			0x270 (PIN_OUTPUT_PULLDOWN | MUX_MODE3)	/* XDMA_EVENT_INTR0/CLKOUT1 */
+		>;
+	};
+
 	cpsw_default: cpsw_default {
 		pinctrl-single,pins = <
 			/* Slave 1 */
@@ -593,6 +599,25 @@
 	pinctrl-0 = <&i2c1_pins>;
 	clock-frequency = <400000>;
 
+	ov2659@30 {
+		compatible = "ovti,ov2659";
+		reg = <0x30>;
+		pinctrl-names = "default";
+		pinctrl-0 = <&clkout1_pin>;
+
+		clocks = <&clkout1_mux_ck>;
+		clock-names = "xvclk";
+		assigned-clocks = <&clkout1_mux_ck>;
+		assigned-clock-parents = <&clkout1_osc_div_ck>;
+
+		port {
+			ov2659_1: endpoint {
+				remote-endpoint = <&vpfe0_ep>;
+				link-frequencies = /bits/ 64 <70000000>;
+			};
+		};
+	};
+
 	edt-ft5306@38 {
 		status = "okay";
 		compatible = "edt,edt-ft5306", "edt,edt-ft5x06";
@@ -877,7 +902,7 @@
 	/* Camera port */
 	port {
 		vpfe0_ep: endpoint {
-			/* remote-endpoint = <&sensor>; add once we have it */
+			remote-endpoint = <&ov2659_1>;
 			ti,am437x-vpfe-interface = <0>;
 			bus-width = <8>;
 			hsync-active = <0>;
-- 
2.17.1

[Patch v3 2/3] ARM: dts: am437x-sk-evm: Add VPFE and OV2659 entries

[Benoit Parrot]

Add VPFE device nodes entries.
Add OmniVision OV2659 sensor device nodes and linkage.

The sensor clock (xvclk) is sourced from clkout1.
Add clock entries to properly select clkout1 and set its parent
clock to sys_clkin_ck.

Signed-off-by: Benoit Parrot <bparrot@ti.com>
---
 arch/arm/boot/dts/am437x-sk-evm.dts | 27 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/am437x-sk-evm.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/am437x-sk-evm.dts
index 74eaa6a3b258..25222497f828 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/am437x-sk-evm.dts
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/am437x-sk-evm.dts
@@ -272,6 +272,12 @@
 		>;
 	};
 
+	clkout1_pin: pinmux_clkout1_pin {
+		pinctrl-single,pins = <
+			0x270 (PIN_OUTPUT_PULLDOWN | MUX_MODE3)	/* XDMA_EVENT_INTR0/CLKOUT1 */
+		>;
+	};
+
 	cpsw_default: cpsw_default {
 		pinctrl-single,pins = <
 			/* Slave 1 */
@@ -593,6 +599,25 @@
 	pinctrl-0 = <&i2c1_pins>;
 	clock-frequency = <400000>;
 
+	ov2659@30 {
+		compatible = "ovti,ov2659";
+		reg = <0x30>;
+		pinctrl-names = "default";
+		pinctrl-0 = <&clkout1_pin>;
+
+		clocks = <&clkout1_mux_ck>;
+		clock-names = "xvclk";
+		assigned-clocks = <&clkout1_mux_ck>;
+		assigned-clock-parents = <&clkout1_osc_div_ck>;
+
+		port {
+			ov2659_1: endpoint {
+				remote-endpoint = <&vpfe0_ep>;
+				link-frequencies = /bits/ 64 <70000000>;
+			};
+		};
+	};
+
 	edt-ft5306@38 {
 		status = "okay";
 		compatible = "edt,edt-ft5306", "edt,edt-ft5x06";
@@ -877,7 +902,7 @@
 	/* Camera port */
 	port {
 		vpfe0_ep: endpoint {
-			/* remote-endpoint = <&sensor>; add once we have it */
+			remote-endpoint = <&ov2659_1>;
 			ti,am437x-vpfe-interface = <0>;
 			bus-width = <8>;
 			hsync-active = <0>;
-- 
2.17.1

[Patch v3 3/3] ARM: dts: am43x-epos-evm: Add VPFE and OV2659 entries

[Benoit Parrot]

Add VPFE device nodes entries.
Add OmniVision OV2659 sensor device nodes and linkage.

Since Rev1.2a on this board the sensor source clock (xvclk) has a
dedicated 12Mhz oscillator instead of using clkout1.
Add 'audio_mstrclk' fixed clock object to represent it.

Signed-off-by: Benoit Parrot <bparrot@ti.com>
---
 arch/arm/boot/dts/am43x-epos-evm.dts | 23 ++++++++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/am43x-epos-evm.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/am43x-epos-evm.dts
index 95314121d111..b0df37014888 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/am43x-epos-evm.dts
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/am43x-epos-evm.dts
@@ -145,6 +145,12 @@
 			system-clock-frequency = <12000000>;
 		};
 	};
+
+	audio_mstrclk: clock {
+		compatible = "fixed-clock";
+		#clock-cells = <0>;
+		clock-frequency = <12000000>;
+	};
 };
 
 &am43xx_pinmux {
@@ -696,6 +702,21 @@
 		IOVDD-supply = <&dcdc4>; /* V3_3D -> DCDC4 */
 		DVDD-supply = <&ldo1>; /* V1_8AUD -> V1_8D -> LDO1 */
 	};
+
+	ov2659@30 {
+		compatible = "ovti,ov2659";
+		reg = <0x30>;
+
+		clocks = <&audio_mstrclk>;
+		clock-names = "xvclk";
+
+		port {
+			ov2659_1: endpoint {
+				remote-endpoint = <&vpfe1_ep>;
+				link-frequencies = /bits/ 64 <70000000>;
+			};
+		};
+	};
 };
 
 &i2c2 {
@@ -962,7 +983,7 @@
 
 	port {
 		vpfe1_ep: endpoint {
-			/* remote-endpoint = <&sensor>; add once we have it */
+			remote-endpoint = <&ov2659_1>;
 			ti,am437x-vpfe-interface = <0>;
 			bus-width = <8>;
 			hsync-active = <0>;
-- 
2.17.1

[Patch v3 3/3] ARM: dts: am43x-epos-evm: Add VPFE and OV2659 entries

[Benoit Parrot]

Add VPFE device nodes entries.
Add OmniVision OV2659 sensor device nodes and linkage.

Since Rev1.2a on this board the sensor source clock (xvclk) has a
dedicated 12Mhz oscillator instead of using clkout1.
Add 'audio_mstrclk' fixed clock object to represent it.

Signed-off-by: Benoit Parrot <bparrot@ti.com>
---
 arch/arm/boot/dts/am43x-epos-evm.dts | 23 ++++++++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/am43x-epos-evm.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/am43x-epos-evm.dts
index 95314121d111..b0df37014888 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/am43x-epos-evm.dts
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/am43x-epos-evm.dts
@@ -145,6 +145,12 @@
 			system-clock-frequency = <12000000>;
 		};
 	};
+
+	audio_mstrclk: clock {
+		compatible = "fixed-clock";
+		#clock-cells = <0>;
+		clock-frequency = <12000000>;
+	};
 };
 
 &am43xx_pinmux {
@@ -696,6 +702,21 @@
 		IOVDD-supply = <&dcdc4>; /* V3_3D -> DCDC4 */
 		DVDD-supply = <&ldo1>; /* V1_8AUD -> V1_8D -> LDO1 */
 	};
+
+	ov2659@30 {
+		compatible = "ovti,ov2659";
+		reg = <0x30>;
+
+		clocks = <&audio_mstrclk>;
+		clock-names = "xvclk";
+
+		port {
+			ov2659_1: endpoint {
+				remote-endpoint = <&vpfe1_ep>;
+				link-frequencies = /bits/ 64 <70000000>;
+			};
+		};
+	};
 };
 
 &i2c2 {
@@ -962,7 +983,7 @@
 
 	port {
 		vpfe1_ep: endpoint {
-			/* remote-endpoint = <&sensor>; add once we have it */
+			remote-endpoint = <&ov2659_1>;
 			ti,am437x-vpfe-interface = <0>;
 			bus-width = <8>;
 			hsync-active = <0>;
-- 
2.17.1

Re: [Patch v3 0/3] ARM: dts: am43x-vpfe/ov2659.patch

[Tony Lindgren]

* Benoit Parrot <bparrot@ti.com> [191211 06:04]:
> This patch series adds the missing camera endpoint (ov2659) as well as
> the required source clocks nodes for the sensor.
> 
> On the am437x-sk-evm the camera sensor is sourced from clkout1 but that
> clock nodes/tree was removed as it was unsed at the time, we are
> re-adding the needed clock nodes here.

Tero, it seems I can already pick this series?

Or ou want to queue the changes to am43xx-clocks.dtsi along with all
your other clock patches?

Regards,

Tony

 
> Changes since v2:
> - Fixed/added Tony's ack
> 
> Changes since v1:
> - Fix clock name to make it generic
> - Add non-standard clock node naming to commit message as per Tony's
>   comment
> - Rename all clock nodes to use '-' instead of '_'
> 
> Benoit Parrot (2):
>   ARM: dts: am437x-sk-evm: Add VPFE and OV2659 entries
>   ARM: dts: am43x-epos-evm: Add VPFE and OV2659 entries
> 
> Tero Kristo (1):
>   ARM: dts: am43xx: add support for clkout1 clock
> 
>  arch/arm/boot/dts/am437x-sk-evm.dts  | 27 +++++++++++++-
>  arch/arm/boot/dts/am43x-epos-evm.dts | 23 +++++++++++-
>  arch/arm/boot/dts/am43xx-clocks.dtsi | 54 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  3 files changed, 102 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> -- 
> 2.17.1
> 

Re: [Patch v3 0/3] ARM: dts: am43x-vpfe/ov2659.patch

[Tero Kristo]

On 12/12/2019 19:41, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * Benoit Parrot <bparrot@ti.com> [191211 06:04]:
>> This patch series adds the missing camera endpoint (ov2659) as well as
>> the required source clocks nodes for the sensor.
>>
>> On the am437x-sk-evm the camera sensor is sourced from clkout1 but that
>> clock nodes/tree was removed as it was unsed at the time, we are
>> re-adding the needed clock nodes here.
> 
> Tero, it seems I can already pick this series?

I believe it is ready if you approve the clkout1 clock patch.

> Or ou want to queue the changes to am43xx-clocks.dtsi along with all
> your other clock patches?

Well, I have actually never queued any omap2+ dts patches myself, and I 
don't think there would be too many of those coming for next merge either.

-Tero

> 
> Regards,
> 
> Tony
> 
>   
>> Changes since v2:
>> - Fixed/added Tony's ack
>>
>> Changes since v1:
>> - Fix clock name to make it generic
>> - Add non-standard clock node naming to commit message as per Tony's
>>    comment
>> - Rename all clock nodes to use '-' instead of '_'
>>
>> Benoit Parrot (2):
>>    ARM: dts: am437x-sk-evm: Add VPFE and OV2659 entries
>>    ARM: dts: am43x-epos-evm: Add VPFE and OV2659 entries
>>
>> Tero Kristo (1):
>>    ARM: dts: am43xx: add support for clkout1 clock
>>
>>   arch/arm/boot/dts/am437x-sk-evm.dts  | 27 +++++++++++++-
>>   arch/arm/boot/dts/am43x-epos-evm.dts | 23 +++++++++++-
>>   arch/arm/boot/dts/am43xx-clocks.dtsi | 54 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>   3 files changed, 102 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> -- 
>> 2.17.1
>>

--
Texas Instruments Finland Oy, Porkkalankatu 22, 00180 Helsinki. Y-tunnus/Business ID: 0615521-4. Kotipaikka/Domicile: Helsinki

Re: [Patch v3 0/3] ARM: dts: am43x-vpfe/ov2659.patch

[Tero Kristo]

On 12/12/2019 19:41, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * Benoit Parrot <bparrot@ti.com> [191211 06:04]:
>> This patch series adds the missing camera endpoint (ov2659) as well as
>> the required source clocks nodes for the sensor.
>>
>> On the am437x-sk-evm the camera sensor is sourced from clkout1 but that
>> clock nodes/tree was removed as it was unsed at the time, we are
>> re-adding the needed clock nodes here.
> 
> Tero, it seems I can already pick this series?

I believe it is ready if you approve the clkout1 clock patch.

> Or ou want to queue the changes to am43xx-clocks.dtsi along with all
> your other clock patches?

Well, I have actually never queued any omap2+ dts patches myself, and I 
don't think there would be too many of those coming for next merge either.

-Tero

> 
> Regards,
> 
> Tony
> 
>   
>> Changes since v2:
>> - Fixed/added Tony's ack
>>
>> Changes since v1:
>> - Fix clock name to make it generic
>> - Add non-standard clock node naming to commit message as per Tony's
>>    comment
>> - Rename all clock nodes to use '-' instead of '_'
>>
>> Benoit Parrot (2):
>>    ARM: dts: am437x-sk-evm: Add VPFE and OV2659 entries
>>    ARM: dts: am43x-epos-evm: Add VPFE and OV2659 entries
>>
>> Tero Kristo (1):
>>    ARM: dts: am43xx: add support for clkout1 clock
>>
>>   arch/arm/boot/dts/am437x-sk-evm.dts  | 27 +++++++++++++-
>>   arch/arm/boot/dts/am43x-epos-evm.dts | 23 +++++++++++-
>>   arch/arm/boot/dts/am43xx-clocks.dtsi | 54 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>   3 files changed, 102 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> -- 
>> 2.17.1
>>

--
Texas Instruments Finland Oy, Porkkalankatu 22, 00180 Helsinki. Y-tunnus/Business ID: 0615521-4. Kotipaikka/Domicile: Helsinki

Re: [Patch v3 0/3] ARM: dts: am43x-vpfe/ov2659.patch

[Tony Lindgren]

* Tero Kristo <t-kristo@ti.com> [191213 07:43]:
> On 12/12/2019 19:41, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > * Benoit Parrot <bparrot@ti.com> [191211 06:04]:
> > > This patch series adds the missing camera endpoint (ov2659) as well as
> > > the required source clocks nodes for the sensor.
> > > 
> > > On the am437x-sk-evm the camera sensor is sourced from clkout1 but that
> > > clock nodes/tree was removed as it was unsed at the time, we are
> > > re-adding the needed clock nodes here.
> > 
> > Tero, it seems I can already pick this series?
> 
> I believe it is ready if you approve the clkout1 clock patch.

OK yeah looks fine.

> > Or ou want to queue the changes to am43xx-clocks.dtsi along with all
> > your other clock patches?
> 
> Well, I have actually never queued any omap2+ dts patches myself, and I
> don't think there would be too many of those coming for next merge either.

OK will queue this series then. For the other ones from Benoit
looks like we need an immutable clock branch before I can apply
anything.

Regards,

Tony

Re: [Patch v3 0/3] ARM: dts: am43x-vpfe/ov2659.patch

[Benoit Parrot]

Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> wrote on Fri [2019-Dec-13 07:29:38 -0800]:
> * Tero Kristo <t-kristo@ti.com> [191213 07:43]:
> > On 12/12/2019 19:41, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > > * Benoit Parrot <bparrot@ti.com> [191211 06:04]:
> > > > This patch series adds the missing camera endpoint (ov2659) as well as
> > > > the required source clocks nodes for the sensor.
> > > > 
> > > > On the am437x-sk-evm the camera sensor is sourced from clkout1 but that
> > > > clock nodes/tree was removed as it was unsed at the time, we are
> > > > re-adding the needed clock nodes here.
> > > 
> > > Tero, it seems I can already pick this series?
> > 
> > I believe it is ready if you approve the clkout1 clock patch.
> 
> OK yeah looks fine.
> 
> > > Or ou want to queue the changes to am43xx-clocks.dtsi along with all
> > > your other clock patches?
> > 
> > Well, I have actually never queued any omap2+ dts patches myself, and I
> > don't think there would be too many of those coming for next merge either.
> 
> OK will queue this series then. For the other ones from Benoit
> looks like we need an immutable clock branch before I can apply
> anything.

Tony, Tero,

Are these merged anyware now?
I still don't see any of these on linux-next?

And by "these" I mean this one and both
 ARM: dts: dra7: add vpe nodes
 ARM: dts: dra7: add cal nodes

Regards,
Benoit

> 
> Regards,
> 
> Tony

Re: [Patch v3 0/3] ARM: dts: am43x-vpfe/ov2659.patch

[Benoit Parrot]

Tony Lindgren <tony-4v6yS6AI5VpBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org> wrote on Fri [2019-Dec-13 07:29:38 -0800]:
> * Tero Kristo <t-kristo-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org> [191213 07:43]:
> > On 12/12/2019 19:41, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > > * Benoit Parrot <bparrot-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org> [191211 06:04]:
> > > > This patch series adds the missing camera endpoint (ov2659) as well as
> > > > the required source clocks nodes for the sensor.
> > > > 
> > > > On the am437x-sk-evm the camera sensor is sourced from clkout1 but that
> > > > clock nodes/tree was removed as it was unsed at the time, we are
> > > > re-adding the needed clock nodes here.
> > > 
> > > Tero, it seems I can already pick this series?
> > 
> > I believe it is ready if you approve the clkout1 clock patch.
> 
> OK yeah looks fine.
> 
> > > Or ou want to queue the changes to am43xx-clocks.dtsi along with all
> > > your other clock patches?
> > 
> > Well, I have actually never queued any omap2+ dts patches myself, and I
> > don't think there would be too many of those coming for next merge either.
> 
> OK will queue this series then. For the other ones from Benoit
> looks like we need an immutable clock branch before I can apply
> anything.

Tony, Tero,

Are these merged anyware now?
I still don't see any of these on linux-next?

And by "these" I mean this one and both
 ARM: dts: dra7: add vpe nodes
 ARM: dts: dra7: add cal nodes

Regards,
Benoit

> 
> Regards,
> 
> Tony

Re: [Patch v3 0/3] ARM: dts: am43x-vpfe/ov2659.patch

[Tony Lindgren]

* Benoit Parrot <bparrot@ti.com> [200113 16:51]:
> Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> wrote on Fri [2019-Dec-13 07:29:38 -0800]:
> > * Tero Kristo <t-kristo@ti.com> [191213 07:43]:
> > > On 12/12/2019 19:41, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > > > * Benoit Parrot <bparrot@ti.com> [191211 06:04]:
> > > > > This patch series adds the missing camera endpoint (ov2659) as well as
> > > > > the required source clocks nodes for the sensor.
> > > > > 
> > > > > On the am437x-sk-evm the camera sensor is sourced from clkout1 but that
> > > > > clock nodes/tree was removed as it was unsed at the time, we are
> > > > > re-adding the needed clock nodes here.
> > > > 
> > > > Tero, it seems I can already pick this series?
> > > 
> > > I believe it is ready if you approve the clkout1 clock patch.
> > 
> > OK yeah looks fine.
> > 
> > > > Or ou want to queue the changes to am43xx-clocks.dtsi along with all
> > > > your other clock patches?
> > > 
> > > Well, I have actually never queued any omap2+ dts patches myself, and I
> > > don't think there would be too many of those coming for next merge either.
> > 
> > OK will queue this series then. For the other ones from Benoit
> > looks like we need an immutable clock branch before I can apply
> > anything.
> 
> Tony, Tero,
> 
> Are these merged anyware now?
> I still don't see any of these on linux-next?

Tero any news on getting some immutable clock changes branch done?
Looks like there are quite a few pending clock patches right now,
probably best to set them all into a branch that I can also merge
in.

> And by "these" I mean this one and both
>  ARM: dts: dra7: add vpe nodes
>  ARM: dts: dra7: add cal nodes

Yeah looks good to me other than the clock dependency.

Regards,

Tony

Re: [Patch v3 0/3] ARM: dts: am43x-vpfe/ov2659.patch

[Tero Kristo]

On 14/01/2020 18:04, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * Benoit Parrot <bparrot@ti.com> [200113 16:51]:
>> Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> wrote on Fri [2019-Dec-13 07:29:38 -0800]:
>>> * Tero Kristo <t-kristo@ti.com> [191213 07:43]:
>>>> On 12/12/2019 19:41, Tony Lindgren wrote:
>>>>> * Benoit Parrot <bparrot@ti.com> [191211 06:04]:
>>>>>> This patch series adds the missing camera endpoint (ov2659) as well as
>>>>>> the required source clocks nodes for the sensor.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On the am437x-sk-evm the camera sensor is sourced from clkout1 but that
>>>>>> clock nodes/tree was removed as it was unsed at the time, we are
>>>>>> re-adding the needed clock nodes here.
>>>>>
>>>>> Tero, it seems I can already pick this series?
>>>>
>>>> I believe it is ready if you approve the clkout1 clock patch.
>>>
>>> OK yeah looks fine.
>>>
>>>>> Or ou want to queue the changes to am43xx-clocks.dtsi along with all
>>>>> your other clock patches?
>>>>
>>>> Well, I have actually never queued any omap2+ dts patches myself, and I
>>>> don't think there would be too many of those coming for next merge either.
>>>
>>> OK will queue this series then. For the other ones from Benoit
>>> looks like we need an immutable clock branch before I can apply
>>> anything.
>>
>> Tony, Tero,
>>
>> Are these merged anyware now?
>> I still don't see any of these on linux-next?
> 
> Tero any news on getting some immutable clock changes branch done?
> Looks like there are quite a few pending clock patches right now,
> probably best to set them all into a branch that I can also merge
> in.

Working on that now, have been forced to prioritize work lately. I can 
probably get the branch set-up on Monday and send a pull-req out 
assuming it is not too late for 5.6 already.

-Tero

> 
>> And by "these" I mean this one and both
>>   ARM: dts: dra7: add vpe nodes
>>   ARM: dts: dra7: add cal nodes
> 
> Yeah looks good to me other than the clock dependency.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Tony
> 

--
Texas Instruments Finland Oy, Porkkalankatu 22, 00180 Helsinki. Y-tunnus/Business ID: 0615521-4. Kotipaikka/Domicile: Helsinki

Re: [Patch v3 0/3] ARM: dts: am43x-vpfe/ov2659.patch

[Tero Kristo]

On 14/01/2020 18:04, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * Benoit Parrot <bparrot-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org> [200113 16:51]:
>> Tony Lindgren <tony-4v6yS6AI5VpBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org> wrote on Fri [2019-Dec-13 07:29:38 -0800]:
>>> * Tero Kristo <t-kristo-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org> [191213 07:43]:
>>>> On 12/12/2019 19:41, Tony Lindgren wrote:
>>>>> * Benoit Parrot <bparrot-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org> [191211 06:04]:
>>>>>> This patch series adds the missing camera endpoint (ov2659) as well as
>>>>>> the required source clocks nodes for the sensor.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On the am437x-sk-evm the camera sensor is sourced from clkout1 but that
>>>>>> clock nodes/tree was removed as it was unsed at the time, we are
>>>>>> re-adding the needed clock nodes here.
>>>>>
>>>>> Tero, it seems I can already pick this series?
>>>>
>>>> I believe it is ready if you approve the clkout1 clock patch.
>>>
>>> OK yeah looks fine.
>>>
>>>>> Or ou want to queue the changes to am43xx-clocks.dtsi along with all
>>>>> your other clock patches?
>>>>
>>>> Well, I have actually never queued any omap2+ dts patches myself, and I
>>>> don't think there would be too many of those coming for next merge either.
>>>
>>> OK will queue this series then. For the other ones from Benoit
>>> looks like we need an immutable clock branch before I can apply
>>> anything.
>>
>> Tony, Tero,
>>
>> Are these merged anyware now?
>> I still don't see any of these on linux-next?
> 
> Tero any news on getting some immutable clock changes branch done?
> Looks like there are quite a few pending clock patches right now,
> probably best to set them all into a branch that I can also merge
> in.

Working on that now, have been forced to prioritize work lately. I can 
probably get the branch set-up on Monday and send a pull-req out 
assuming it is not too late for 5.6 already.

-Tero

> 
>> And by "these" I mean this one and both
>>   ARM: dts: dra7: add vpe nodes
>>   ARM: dts: dra7: add cal nodes
> 
> Yeah looks good to me other than the clock dependency.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Tony
> 

--
Texas Instruments Finland Oy, Porkkalankatu 22, 00180 Helsinki. Y-tunnus/Business ID: 0615521-4. Kotipaikka/Domicile: Helsinki

Re: [Patch v3 0/3] ARM: dts: am43x-vpfe/ov2659.patch

[Tony Lindgren]

* Tero Kristo <t-kristo@ti.com> [200117 14:16]:
> On 14/01/2020 18:04, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > * Benoit Parrot <bparrot@ti.com> [200113 16:51]:
> > > Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> wrote on Fri [2019-Dec-13 07:29:38 -0800]:
> > > > * Tero Kristo <t-kristo@ti.com> [191213 07:43]:
> > > > > On 12/12/2019 19:41, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > > > > > * Benoit Parrot <bparrot@ti.com> [191211 06:04]:
> > > > > > > This patch series adds the missing camera endpoint (ov2659) as well as
> > > > > > > the required source clocks nodes for the sensor.
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > On the am437x-sk-evm the camera sensor is sourced from clkout1 but that
> > > > > > > clock nodes/tree was removed as it was unsed at the time, we are
> > > > > > > re-adding the needed clock nodes here.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Tero, it seems I can already pick this series?
> > > > > 
> > > > > I believe it is ready if you approve the clkout1 clock patch.
> > > > 
> > > > OK yeah looks fine.
> > > > 
> > > > > > Or ou want to queue the changes to am43xx-clocks.dtsi along with all
> > > > > > your other clock patches?
> > > > > 
> > > > > Well, I have actually never queued any omap2+ dts patches myself, and I
> > > > > don't think there would be too many of those coming for next merge either.
> > > > 
> > > > OK will queue this series then. For the other ones from Benoit
> > > > looks like we need an immutable clock branch before I can apply
> > > > anything.
> > > 
> > > Tony, Tero,
> > > 
> > > Are these merged anyware now?
> > > I still don't see any of these on linux-next?
> > 
> > Tero any news on getting some immutable clock changes branch done?
> > Looks like there are quite a few pending clock patches right now,
> > probably best to set them all into a branch that I can also merge
> > in.
> 
> Working on that now, have been forced to prioritize work lately. I can
> probably get the branch set-up on Monday and send a pull-req out assuming it
> is not too late for 5.6 already.

Yes it might be too late, but I'm applying these too into
omap-for-v5.6/ti-sysc-dt-cam.

Regards,

Tony

Re: [Patch v3 0/3] ARM: dts: am43x-vpfe/ov2659.patch

[Tony Lindgren]

* Tero Kristo <t-kristo-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org> [200117 14:16]:
> On 14/01/2020 18:04, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > * Benoit Parrot <bparrot-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org> [200113 16:51]:
> > > Tony Lindgren <tony-4v6yS6AI5VpBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org> wrote on Fri [2019-Dec-13 07:29:38 -0800]:
> > > > * Tero Kristo <t-kristo-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org> [191213 07:43]:
> > > > > On 12/12/2019 19:41, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > > > > > * Benoit Parrot <bparrot-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org> [191211 06:04]:
> > > > > > > This patch series adds the missing camera endpoint (ov2659) as well as
> > > > > > > the required source clocks nodes for the sensor.
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > On the am437x-sk-evm the camera sensor is sourced from clkout1 but that
> > > > > > > clock nodes/tree was removed as it was unsed at the time, we are
> > > > > > > re-adding the needed clock nodes here.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Tero, it seems I can already pick this series?
> > > > > 
> > > > > I believe it is ready if you approve the clkout1 clock patch.
> > > > 
> > > > OK yeah looks fine.
> > > > 
> > > > > > Or ou want to queue the changes to am43xx-clocks.dtsi along with all
> > > > > > your other clock patches?
> > > > > 
> > > > > Well, I have actually never queued any omap2+ dts patches myself, and I
> > > > > don't think there would be too many of those coming for next merge either.
> > > > 
> > > > OK will queue this series then. For the other ones from Benoit
> > > > looks like we need an immutable clock branch before I can apply
> > > > anything.
> > > 
> > > Tony, Tero,
> > > 
> > > Are these merged anyware now?
> > > I still don't see any of these on linux-next?
> > 
> > Tero any news on getting some immutable clock changes branch done?
> > Looks like there are quite a few pending clock patches right now,
> > probably best to set them all into a branch that I can also merge
> > in.
> 
> Working on that now, have been forced to prioritize work lately. I can
> probably get the branch set-up on Monday and send a pull-req out assuming it
> is not too late for 5.6 already.

Yes it might be too late, but I'm applying these too into
omap-for-v5.6/ti-sysc-dt-cam.

Regards,

Tony