From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99E27C43603 for ; Tue, 17 Dec 2019 17:55:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70D88206EC for ; Tue, 17 Dec 2019 17:55:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727709AbfLQRzJ (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Dec 2019 12:55:09 -0500 Received: from mga14.intel.com ([192.55.52.115]:47079 "EHLO mga14.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726722AbfLQRzJ (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Dec 2019 12:55:09 -0500 X-Amp-Result: UNSCANNABLE X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga002.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.21]) by fmsmga103.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 17 Dec 2019 09:55:08 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.69,326,1571727600"; d="scan'208";a="227576274" Received: from sjchrist-coffee.jf.intel.com (HELO linux.intel.com) ([10.54.74.202]) by orsmga002.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 17 Dec 2019 09:55:08 -0800 Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2019 09:55:08 -0800 From: Sean Christopherson To: Christian Borntraeger Cc: James Hogan , Paul Mackerras , Janosch Frank , Paolo Bonzini , Radim =?utf-8?B?S3LEjW3DocWZ?= , Marc Zyngier , David Hildenbrand , Cornelia Huck , Vitaly Kuznetsov , Wanpeng Li , Jim Mattson , Joerg Roedel , James Morse , Julien Thierry , Suzuki K Poulose , linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Christoffer Dall Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/15] KVM: Dynamically size memslot arrays Message-ID: <20191217175507.GA8052@linux.intel.com> References: <20191024230744.14543-1-sean.j.christopherson@intel.com> <20191203221433.GK19877@linux.intel.com> <20191213200151.GF31552@linux.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 09:25:24AM +0100, Christian Borntraeger wrote: > > On 13.12.19 21:01, Sean Christopherson wrote: > > Applies cleanly on the current kvm/queue and nothing caught fire in > > testing (though I only re-tested the series as a whole). > > Do you have the latest version somewhere on a branch? The version on the > list no longer applies cleanly. Ah, I only tested with my sparse x86-only tree. The result with three-way merging, i.e. 'git am -3', looks correct at a glance. Regardless, I need to spin a new version to handle a conflict with an unrelated in-flight memslots bug fix, I'll get that sent out today. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC7E2C43603 for ; Tue, 17 Dec 2019 17:55:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu (mm01.cs.columbia.edu [128.59.11.253]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77F32206EC for ; Tue, 17 Dec 2019 17:55:14 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 77F32206EC Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=kvmarm-bounces@lists.cs.columbia.edu Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE3934A7F1; Tue, 17 Dec 2019 12:55:13 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: at lists.cs.columbia.edu Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mm01.cs.columbia.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SVX3P8dhuIqK; Tue, 17 Dec 2019 12:55:12 -0500 (EST) Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD76A4A4A9; Tue, 17 Dec 2019 12:55:12 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDADE4A49C for ; Tue, 17 Dec 2019 12:55:11 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: at lists.cs.columbia.edu Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mm01.cs.columbia.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mugjKfDxhU7R for ; Tue, 17 Dec 2019 12:55:10 -0500 (EST) Received: from mga11.intel.com (mga11.intel.com [192.55.52.93]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 861A74A319 for ; Tue, 17 Dec 2019 12:55:10 -0500 (EST) X-Amp-Result: UNKNOWN X-Amp-Original-Verdict: FILE UNKNOWN X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga002.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.21]) by fmsmga102.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 17 Dec 2019 09:55:08 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.69,326,1571727600"; d="scan'208";a="227576274" Received: from sjchrist-coffee.jf.intel.com (HELO linux.intel.com) ([10.54.74.202]) by orsmga002.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 17 Dec 2019 09:55:08 -0800 Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2019 09:55:08 -0800 From: Sean Christopherson To: Christian Borntraeger Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/15] KVM: Dynamically size memslot arrays Message-ID: <20191217175507.GA8052@linux.intel.com> References: <20191024230744.14543-1-sean.j.christopherson@intel.com> <20191203221433.GK19877@linux.intel.com> <20191213200151.GF31552@linux.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) Cc: Wanpeng Li , kvm@vger.kernel.org, James Hogan , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Paul Mackerras , kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, Janosch Frank , Marc Zyngier , Joerg Roedel , David Hildenbrand , kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Jim Mattson , Cornelia Huck , linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, Paolo Bonzini , Vitaly Kuznetsov X-BeenThere: kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Where KVM/ARM decisions are made List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: kvmarm-bounces@lists.cs.columbia.edu Sender: kvmarm-bounces@lists.cs.columbia.edu On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 09:25:24AM +0100, Christian Borntraeger wrote: > > On 13.12.19 21:01, Sean Christopherson wrote: > > Applies cleanly on the current kvm/queue and nothing caught fire in > > testing (though I only re-tested the series as a whole). > > Do you have the latest version somewhere on a branch? The version on the > list no longer applies cleanly. Ah, I only tested with my sparse x86-only tree. The result with three-way merging, i.e. 'git am -3', looks correct at a glance. Regardless, I need to spin a new version to handle a conflict with an unrelated in-flight memslots bug fix, I'll get that sent out today. _______________________________________________ kvmarm mailing list kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5250FC43603 for ; Tue, 17 Dec 2019 17:55:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 257E3206EC for ; Tue, 17 Dec 2019 17:55:19 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="u9PHu/5F" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 257E3206EC Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=m5NGAwuFf1pQsAItuzUfugwc+/EdvZ4rTXWinX0yCZo=; b=u9PHu/5FOsptKU Z8kxu0sGr2Ifil53CXopDJ02sABaGXlXkhsS220bs88OvRns/QQghAdUdqebeXSakM2gg6LRAHIDk EHUoQECJ1ZSy/6fPnI1DR2ER+CH2v2R7FKFFF0JAoOa/xLj9nPa7f9i8xtYUqqiAWceQHLLKHmygv sAKu+wedgaYRT2iwrbe4Cloo0Li84pHCoGj8I/QFMaFpbElI8q8k7Zr1YEYFujq/XyUjwTXLPjzay aHF9JJZXCpucifiP+4XcEylOIu7u+UlFz/KQsSuGWo2ayz8YbuyUIpIgY8TcGNcyj7FhmxkYE9G9V I713gmo2dGhI/Hn8Euew==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1ihH3x-0001LA-78; Tue, 17 Dec 2019 17:55:13 +0000 Received: from mga17.intel.com ([192.55.52.151]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1ihH3u-0001HB-Na for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 17 Dec 2019 17:55:11 +0000 X-Amp-Result: UNSCANNABLE X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga002.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.21]) by fmsmga107.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 17 Dec 2019 09:55:08 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.69,326,1571727600"; d="scan'208";a="227576274" Received: from sjchrist-coffee.jf.intel.com (HELO linux.intel.com) ([10.54.74.202]) by orsmga002.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 17 Dec 2019 09:55:08 -0800 Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2019 09:55:08 -0800 From: Sean Christopherson To: Christian Borntraeger Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/15] KVM: Dynamically size memslot arrays Message-ID: <20191217175507.GA8052@linux.intel.com> References: <20191024230744.14543-1-sean.j.christopherson@intel.com> <20191203221433.GK19877@linux.intel.com> <20191213200151.GF31552@linux.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20191217_095510_781078_7F45C34D X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 11.04 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Wanpeng Li , kvm@vger.kernel.org, Radim =?utf-8?B?S3LEjW3DocWZ?= , James Hogan , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Paul Mackerras , kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, Janosch Frank , Marc Zyngier , Joerg Roedel , David Hildenbrand , Julien Thierry , Christoffer Dall , kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Jim Mattson , Cornelia Huck , linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, James Morse , Paolo Bonzini , Vitaly Kuznetsov , Suzuki K Poulose Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 09:25:24AM +0100, Christian Borntraeger wrote: > > On 13.12.19 21:01, Sean Christopherson wrote: > > Applies cleanly on the current kvm/queue and nothing caught fire in > > testing (though I only re-tested the series as a whole). > > Do you have the latest version somewhere on a branch? The version on the > list no longer applies cleanly. Ah, I only tested with my sparse x86-only tree. The result with three-way merging, i.e. 'git am -3', looks correct at a glance. Regardless, I need to spin a new version to handle a conflict with an unrelated in-flight memslots bug fix, I'll get that sent out today. _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sean Christopherson Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2019 17:55:08 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/15] KVM: Dynamically size memslot arrays Message-Id: <20191217175507.GA8052@linux.intel.com> List-Id: References: <20191024230744.14543-1-sean.j.christopherson@intel.com> <20191203221433.GK19877@linux.intel.com> <20191213200151.GF31552@linux.intel.com> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Christian Borntraeger Cc: James Hogan , Paul Mackerras , Janosch Frank , Paolo Bonzini , Radim =?utf-8?B?S3LEjW3DocWZ?= , Marc Zyngier , David Hildenbrand , Cornelia Huck , Vitaly Kuznetsov , Wanpeng Li , Jim Mattson , Joerg Roedel , James Morse , Julien Thierry , Suzuki K Poulose , linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Christoffer Dall On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 09:25:24AM +0100, Christian Borntraeger wrote: > > On 13.12.19 21:01, Sean Christopherson wrote: > > Applies cleanly on the current kvm/queue and nothing caught fire in > > testing (though I only re-tested the series as a whole). > > Do you have the latest version somewhere on a branch? The version on the > list no longer applies cleanly. Ah, I only tested with my sparse x86-only tree. The result with three-way merging, i.e. 'git am -3', looks correct at a glance. Regardless, I need to spin a new version to handle a conflict with an unrelated in-flight memslots bug fix, I'll get that sent out today.