From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 014ABC43603 for ; Wed, 18 Dec 2019 21:12:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1D30218AC for ; Wed, 18 Dec 2019 21:12:35 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1576703555; bh=4RH/TmZuAJlI0q1kIVymXm7bQbzesZoCwVGj1lkpH5E=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-ID:From; b=XHc5cSIgw1rk0PmSHtFXsz0NaiSAht9XCW3vTyaCF8PAx6zddQmuTkhoVNteDnpEN ymcsaPpeLcGI2K4LuMY+q7UCeHqbO8oasPPFRZd2uqwvmyGGf7Ag3908Cnk4lhob2T NsYz9KhePDtPq8qSR+9dDqblOWMVpSyof8eZBrLQ= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726690AbfLRVMe (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Dec 2019 16:12:34 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:47070 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725991AbfLRVMe (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Dec 2019 16:12:34 -0500 Received: from localhost (83-86-89-107.cable.dynamic.v4.ziggo.nl [83.86.89.107]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4CC212072B; Wed, 18 Dec 2019 21:12:33 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1576703553; bh=4RH/TmZuAJlI0q1kIVymXm7bQbzesZoCwVGj1lkpH5E=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=hPdJBKL/dFVrjaOmqF0b9io657NHPYcPlDsEj4JLr3jfzx3uu5FH4CRshTOfo1fYt JRUyrasO5JP2tOr6YO0CRArhfMGdYMor6HDpbURucAS08w5RJqT1TftYf3BjHb0M/3 F1Wk8SGe0kHtRz4j3E8ZkjGRW0qEDyyPTBlt4bdQ= Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2019 22:12:31 +0100 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Arvind Sankar Cc: Jiri Slaby , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/24] Consolidate dummy_con initialization Message-ID: <20191218211231.GA918900@kroah.com> References: <20191218204002.30512-1-nivedita@alum.mit.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20191218204002.30512-1-nivedita@alum.mit.edu> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Dec 18, 2019 at 03:39:38PM -0500, Arvind Sankar wrote: > This series moves initialization of conswitchp to dummy_con into vt.c, > and configures DUMMY_CONSOLE unconditionally when CONFIG_VT is enabled. > > The patches after the second one remove conswitchp = &dummy_con; from > the various architecture setup functions where it currently appears. If > the first two look ok, I was thinking of sending the others > individually. > > Arvind Sankar (24): > console/dummycon: Remove bogus depends on from DUMMY_CONSOLE > vt: Initialize conswitchp to dummy_con if unset > arch/setup: Drop dummy_con initialization > arch/setup: Drop dummy_con initialization No two patches in a series should have the same subject line, let alone 20 of them. Please fix up. thanks, greg k-h