From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 423E0C2D0DA for ; Fri, 27 Dec 2019 17:53:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 171102176D for ; Fri, 27 Dec 2019 17:53:19 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1577469199; bh=Cm/FXUokmBwUWaazZYSM4VH0fK5k9FrRbUsXO20vaLs=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:List-ID:From; b=YDDM5rJ/+m00fttMmczYksF8LDCO/XD8VQb4QlaXutSVKdNioIBi+ix4uO0VVvDYf 84X8oU3RB4B9Zy7y0OUiyo7Tj09++mtfJ8xam4IYwBGLX4Z5gkgq4ilIqdp9iCiOuN mSZ7aYE85ORy52kmSQwK9YzyJSUoOJ7wtVR1rs1E= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727516AbfL0Rmz (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Dec 2019 12:42:55 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:39956 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727993AbfL0Rmt (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Dec 2019 12:42:49 -0500 Received: from sasha-vm.mshome.net (c-73-47-72-35.hsd1.nh.comcast.net [73.47.72.35]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B335B21582; Fri, 27 Dec 2019 17:42:47 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1577468568; bh=Cm/FXUokmBwUWaazZYSM4VH0fK5k9FrRbUsXO20vaLs=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=yaCmE9o2ffTnqy8VXug5x6RyU8vFhvvVJ8Bf8vKoC7/EKLKz5AFSUDX06sY6if2lx 3vfc1DJx4eDRHEUXLMNVwdedYWTrumadSPg/vDb4MmKKK2qRk493L58BTJAzPosY9o HZTL4kx1U89dpAdQUu4JU+NTW+n0CiPd0uBAspSM= From: Sasha Levin To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: Mike Rapoport , Christian Zigotzky , Christoph Hellwig , Michael Ellerman , Sasha Levin , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.4 093/187] powerpc: Ensure that swiotlb buffer is allocated from low memory Date: Fri, 27 Dec 2019 12:39:21 -0500 Message-Id: <20191227174055.4923-93-sashal@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.20.1 In-Reply-To: <20191227174055.4923-1-sashal@kernel.org> References: <20191227174055.4923-1-sashal@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-stable: review X-Patchwork-Hint: Ignore Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Mike Rapoport [ Upstream commit 8fabc623238e68b3ac63c0dd1657bf86c1fa33af ] Some powerpc platforms (e.g. 85xx) limit DMA-able memory way below 4G. If a system has more physical memory than this limit, the swiotlb buffer is not addressable because it is allocated from memblock using top-down mode. Force memblock to bottom-up mode before calling swiotlb_init() to ensure that the swiotlb buffer is DMA-able. Reported-by: Christian Zigotzky Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191204123524.22919-1-rppt@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin --- arch/powerpc/mm/mem.c | 8 ++++++++ 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) diff --git a/arch/powerpc/mm/mem.c b/arch/powerpc/mm/mem.c index be941d382c8d..14c2c53e3f9e 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/mm/mem.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/mem.c @@ -260,6 +260,14 @@ void __init mem_init(void) BUILD_BUG_ON(MMU_PAGE_COUNT > 16); #ifdef CONFIG_SWIOTLB + /* + * Some platforms (e.g. 85xx) limit DMA-able memory way below + * 4G. We force memblock to bottom-up mode to ensure that the + * memory allocated in swiotlb_init() is DMA-able. + * As it's the last memblock allocation, no need to reset it + * back to to-down. + */ + memblock_set_bottom_up(true); swiotlb_init(0); #endif -- 2.20.1 From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC362C2D0DA for ; Fri, 27 Dec 2019 17:48:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 14FD1206CB for ; Fri, 27 Dec 2019 17:48:16 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="yaCmE9o2" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 14FD1206CB Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47kvSG1Cp3zDqDL for ; Sat, 28 Dec 2019 04:48:14 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=kernel.org (client-ip=198.145.29.99; helo=mail.kernel.org; envelope-from=sashal@kernel.org; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="yaCmE9o2"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47kvL24rnpzDqDL for ; Sat, 28 Dec 2019 04:42:50 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from sasha-vm.mshome.net (c-73-47-72-35.hsd1.nh.comcast.net [73.47.72.35]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B335B21582; Fri, 27 Dec 2019 17:42:47 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1577468568; bh=Cm/FXUokmBwUWaazZYSM4VH0fK5k9FrRbUsXO20vaLs=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=yaCmE9o2ffTnqy8VXug5x6RyU8vFhvvVJ8Bf8vKoC7/EKLKz5AFSUDX06sY6if2lx 3vfc1DJx4eDRHEUXLMNVwdedYWTrumadSPg/vDb4MmKKK2qRk493L58BTJAzPosY9o HZTL4kx1U89dpAdQUu4JU+NTW+n0CiPd0uBAspSM= From: Sasha Levin To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.4 093/187] powerpc: Ensure that swiotlb buffer is allocated from low memory Date: Fri, 27 Dec 2019 12:39:21 -0500 Message-Id: <20191227174055.4923-93-sashal@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.20.1 In-Reply-To: <20191227174055.4923-1-sashal@kernel.org> References: <20191227174055.4923-1-sashal@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-stable: review X-Patchwork-Hint: Ignore Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Sasha Levin , Mike Rapoport , Christian Zigotzky , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Christoph Hellwig Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" From: Mike Rapoport [ Upstream commit 8fabc623238e68b3ac63c0dd1657bf86c1fa33af ] Some powerpc platforms (e.g. 85xx) limit DMA-able memory way below 4G. If a system has more physical memory than this limit, the swiotlb buffer is not addressable because it is allocated from memblock using top-down mode. Force memblock to bottom-up mode before calling swiotlb_init() to ensure that the swiotlb buffer is DMA-able. Reported-by: Christian Zigotzky Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191204123524.22919-1-rppt@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin --- arch/powerpc/mm/mem.c | 8 ++++++++ 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) diff --git a/arch/powerpc/mm/mem.c b/arch/powerpc/mm/mem.c index be941d382c8d..14c2c53e3f9e 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/mm/mem.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/mem.c @@ -260,6 +260,14 @@ void __init mem_init(void) BUILD_BUG_ON(MMU_PAGE_COUNT > 16); #ifdef CONFIG_SWIOTLB + /* + * Some platforms (e.g. 85xx) limit DMA-able memory way below + * 4G. We force memblock to bottom-up mode to ensure that the + * memory allocated in swiotlb_init() is DMA-able. + * As it's the last memblock allocation, no need to reset it + * back to to-down. + */ + memblock_set_bottom_up(true); swiotlb_init(0); #endif -- 2.20.1