From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Reindl Harald Subject: Re: SMART detects pending sectors; take offline? Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2017 12:38:22 +0100 Message-ID: <201ea04e-1a03-fc83-c31c-146b50bb8624@thelounge.net> References: <629d29b4-a3ae-533f-bdba-f115e99d8ce4@shenkin.org> <8cb4bb54-fadc-30c3-58b9-16e1ca460e83@thelounge.net> <8da0ac59-d83b-671c-b088-8e04b13d685e@turmel.org> <7b011b63-4de6-44ec-1f74-9f33c6466795@turmel.org> <2ab868eb-3ce3-f01b-ac9e-23358563040c@shenkin.org> <59DF4B80.5010807@youngman.org.uk> <5b28b0fc-5e4d-9ac3-9a82-7e36f25c5108@shenkin.org> <7bf0a71e-6cb7-59bc-695b-54ed6b08112b@turmel.org> <05e4489d-98ea-4d12-02d6-f13a98e3d5d4@shenkin.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <05e4489d-98ea-4d12-02d6-f13a98e3d5d4@shenkin.org> Content-Language: de-CH Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Alexander Shenkin , Phil Turmel , Edward Kuns , Mark Knecht Cc: Wols Lists , Carsten Aulbert , Linux-RAID List-Id: linux-raid.ids Am 21.12.2017 um 12:28 schrieb Alexander Shenkin: > Hi all, > > Reporting back after changing the hangcheck timer to 180 secs and > re-running checkarray.  I got a number of rebuild events (see syslog > excerpts below and attached), and I see no signs of the hangcheck issue > in dmesg like I did last time. > > I'm still getting the SMART OfflineUncorrectableSector and > CurrentPendingSector errors, however.  Should those go away if the > rewrites were correctly carried out by the drive?  Any thoughts on next > steps to verify everything is ok? OfflineUncorrectableSector unlikely can go away CurrentPendingSector https://kb.acronis.com/content/9133