From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC1E4C3276E for ; Thu, 2 Jan 2020 23:05:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8ED2620848 for ; Thu, 2 Jan 2020 23:05:21 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="aLeDg29p" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726293AbgABXFU (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Jan 2020 18:05:20 -0500 Received: from mail-pf1-f193.google.com ([209.85.210.193]:38644 "EHLO mail-pf1-f193.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725890AbgABXFU (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Jan 2020 18:05:20 -0500 Received: by mail-pf1-f193.google.com with SMTP id x185so22717752pfc.5; Thu, 02 Jan 2020 15:05:20 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=ryxK0mpRSxESJVWZudLQb/s67AYldpkB0jSH1Eh1Afw=; b=aLeDg29p2KmC/fcmH39b5xWwftAl2vmN2tDI78IvgZ6okRJ5LBdipUUBwbatq4qlgJ 1aNDo7E/8HYOiiwV6+iY3XlcZ4+tTrQPKH8kXppZaAs3ViSizlVTHQn32A7F8pYo+yxP 7A9EUxHltGR3cLoMw0+gZWuVT8IuAQRyLXPVAI68sXpVdu+2Vu+mhE03ChwzjPXC7+na MEXkHYURiJrTFz6joKR56JNB71mt0ISgWE+/4JTflb7xdoPcHHxPz8HZlnkmsLBKhftm F7hlGnTQ90SgE6yzVUUsjaSHYcqHCccfHHNZH2Sc+18odqiYAX2nq3ilFvlob1N+JY8V W3/Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=ryxK0mpRSxESJVWZudLQb/s67AYldpkB0jSH1Eh1Afw=; b=bPzJwnVa0lSw92x1NdO+RLDoesLU5auKqwh5/YB5XZmDJPZ/6tgRKIg6tTYx0Am73v LaRBdS4OOCZiK7YWpeTCRg5WrHRMOd6YJiioCst3sAsidY2cIHCAvGlJCYBL/fKWvdtZ N6kCN6eHEyX5z3G8Kh/1kVfLdAbXW524HkxkaUf7nEWHX5h6J7gsaURKTPFlXw29Msa0 w2xF3CJR+dSQMNF4Ju1MJn2ZNvIyEZv2CxGDjdIsCLp60x48V3l+JiS08dBTUirgwwyy XbDc9nO1+eoLiLPADQLg2WbGUaoW0HvxepJfC6lSKqWXdyBwFtGpM6UiIyJPSvRbEG1i VoFw== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVL22iarJ8n2E78YyFhAWg308560eXQ05Rot9cSTbemJLmlm2bP OERM1h+yjhaDYIDOS8GgObM= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzRWoUbS3Y9gTmH/CRnK1CzA1PLL56ZbDydCwBi6vJWZQmBQydnOJ6BNg36lSEJWkP6r4NRZw== X-Received: by 2002:aa7:968d:: with SMTP id f13mr88709714pfk.67.1578006319882; Thu, 02 Jan 2020 15:05:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost ([2600:1700:e321:62f0:329c:23ff:fee3:9d7c]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id q15sm60886561pgi.55.2020.01.02.15.05.18 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Thu, 02 Jan 2020 15:05:19 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2020 15:05:18 -0800 From: Guenter Roeck To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, ben.hutchings@codethink.co.uk, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.14 00/91] 4.14.162-stable review Message-ID: <20200102230518.GA1087@roeck-us.net> References: <20200102220356.856162165@linuxfoundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200102220356.856162165@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jan 02, 2020 at 11:06:42PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.14.162 release. > There are 91 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Sat, 04 Jan 2020 22:01:54 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. > drivers/pci/switch/switchtec.c: In function 'ioctl_event_summary': drivers/pci/switch/switchtec.c:901:18: error: implicit declaration of function 'readq'; did you mean 'readl'? The problem also affects v4.19.y. Seen with various 32-bit builds, including i386:allmodconfig and arm:allmodconfig. The backport replaces ioread64 with readq, which may not have been such a good idea. Guenter