From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.stusta.mhn.de (mail.stusta.mhn.de [141.84.69.5]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F39A87FF5F for ; Fri, 10 Jan 2020 15:00:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.stusta.mhn.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 47vR4V3wTDz4K; Fri, 10 Jan 2020 16:00:42 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=stusta.de; s=default; t=1578668443; bh=bCIqSxNxoHwGiXQLDw+T9+MFPeEeoIUC7qin1WRz0CY=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=YFtG6eAxHmnf+pcjRBOz+5F3wUr/vzdIqsfINZHv92+eLygTa4aCEFwlvrNkea0jU sZgwDsnJ5ZY+k+RGMQrfv659Kor7np/r1/7Ez0gg09aUYGRQDRz5WcMaobJ164JTth oSxJ9j/jGkvqQDO9aCsrLlznEvlEyBJCOwj7yUEojSYXAMgbDTPoRE/zGoxCZzYD0A 7zTzPUs67v4wlB0m8kXmGnyyQhlUu2q1yTB1WB/cUyl/m0ielGuH4QejX1X5hKRZoA 4DeSqnDPcepi+l4diV+7eEDz24d7h8/2df3HKWk8Kmxpps7tvh11aFmn0qgZGXEKSp GIllbf9XYwr06/8/Qe1MPw4RBz1NhbYhjIMYFhWPXp/UdfzYsbxjKRqqcrhBS279Kc LRjU+tSD7/d5pUGhOD8sEWir8N9fbC0y6XJ2wUQuakcPAmF/WMhb/e2dkps+oQet12 IeEM54aj523ADim4kPqSHc8l+OGmE++IpzTVBkTr+lZlFpJ99E4v3EqpIQxFplGza4 EaOiOisQXs8d6uiII72gOlVm2MewEf89/UvipMsDL+AeXJNOKzcpSfttKM2IqL4r91 vWGRTg5oxb3zUSZlyJofentHOb6znxoYF0r5w4mo5A6jcEv4MQX06rGg6FL/E9Z+gL tfpJvfvAbISFH6OioNFW1j6Y= Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2020 17:00:40 +0200 From: Adrian Bunk To: Alexander Kanavin Message-ID: <20200110150040.GA29928@localhost> References: <20200109144454.GB31026@bill-the-cat> <20200109150148.GC31026@bill-the-cat> <20200109155506.GD31026@bill-the-cat> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Cc: Tom Rini , OE-core Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/28] ifupdown: update 0.8.22 -> 0.8.35 X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2020 15:00:45 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline On Thu, Jan 09, 2020 at 05:12:58PM +0100, Alexander Kanavin wrote: > On Thu, 9 Jan 2020 at 16:55, Tom Rini wrote: > > > I have to admit I'm guessing at what level of automated run-time testing > > we normally have today. We sanity test a sysvinit+busybox image with > > networking, yes? If so, we also do that on systemd and I assume with > > what I put for the systemd+busybox-free we also do there, yes? > > > > I believe we test sysvinit+busybox, and systemd+busybox at runtime via poky > and poky-alt distro configs. > > We also test systemd+busybox-free core-base-utils (without ifupdown), but > only as a build (no runtime tests). See > lib/oeqa/selftest/cases/imagefeatures.py. Is musl runtime tested at all? ifupdown is one of these recipes where a musl build error was "fixed" with a patch that makes something do the wrong thing at runtime when using musl. > Alex cu Adrian