On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 02:58:54PM +0000, John Garry wrote:
> On 10/01/2020 14:07, Mark Brown wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 11:55:37AM +0000, John Garry wrote: >

> > OK, so that's just reusing the DT binding in which case everything
> > that's valid for the DT binding should also be valid for ACPI - I
> > thought that actually worked automatically without you having to do
> > anything in the code but ICBW.

> I thought that it would be improper as we could be mixing ACPI methods to
> describe the serial bus (SPI Serial Bus Connection Resource Descriptor) and
> also DT properties which could conflict, like CS active high.

Yes, that's one of the issues with importing bits of DT into ACPI
unfortunately - you will get conflicts, it's not clear it's a good idea
to be using PRP0001 for SPI stuff given that there's bus level bindings
for both ACPI and SPI and they don't line up exactly.

> However I do see extra properties than "compatible" being added in DSD for
> PRP0001:
> https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/662813/ (see EEPROM part)

> And if we were to do this, I think that we would need to add some
> device_property_read_u32("spi-rx-bus-width", ...), etc calls in the SPI FW
> parsing for ACPI path - I couldn't see that.

You'd need parsing code, yes.