From: Changbin Du <changbin.du@gmail.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
hpa@zytor.com, x86@kernel.org,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/nmi: remove the irqwork from long duration nmi handler
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2020 17:34:50 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200110173449.rhr5p4lal3aul43g@mail.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200110151329.GF19453@zn.tnic>
On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 04:13:29PM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 10:05:49PM +0800, Changbin Du wrote:
> > I added a new function nmi_check_duration(), so shoudn't this check be
> > done in that function?
>
> Why should it be done in that function? Your patch is removing irq_work
> - why is it doing additional changes?
>
Just to move all the check code together and be a standalone function.
yes, this somewhat does code refining after the irqwork is removed but
I think it is normal.
> > Don't worry about performance, this function will be inlined by
> > compiler.
>
> I'm not worried about that at all.
>
> Btw, why are you sending private mail and not keeping the discussion on
> the mailing list?
>
oops, typed wrong key. Just added back.
> --
> Regards/Gruss,
> Boris.
>
> https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
--
Cheers,
Changbin Du
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-01-10 17:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-01-01 7:20 [PATCH] x86/nmi: remove the irqwork from long duration nmi handler Changbin Du
2020-01-07 14:41 ` Changbin Du
2020-01-09 20:55 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-01-09 21:02 ` Borislav Petkov
[not found] ` <20200110140549.xqjhrdpxllkvqbuk@mail.google.com>
[not found] ` <20200110151329.GF19453@zn.tnic>
2020-01-10 17:34 ` Changbin Du [this message]
2020-01-10 19:58 ` Borislav Petkov
2020-01-11 0:17 ` Changbin Du
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200110173449.rhr5p4lal3aul43g@mail.google.com \
--to=changbin.du@gmail.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.