From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FCC2C33CB1 for ; Wed, 15 Jan 2020 05:10:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3188D2081E for ; Wed, 15 Jan 2020 05:10:44 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1579065044; bh=C4oxB1KuMssGA4cmBfkzV+QupCkEj6wf0SdPunP6KJc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-ID:From; b=u6Vf2KC6kep1hlf55asn3VWDaAXFHWEXLn05YOGmVS7LO7NJcvekh1YxqhC6goqMU KT3h44Xt2QkBOR+Q+c9D01EfAwotOo7QGs936ngaCMEs16QgiX/JqRrRQtqPiBhJ6N TPg7HRT9w1tefV4suPXCozqpUHa9HNjRRF+rWymI= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729052AbgAOFKn (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Jan 2020 00:10:43 -0500 Received: from mail-pj1-f65.google.com ([209.85.216.65]:36709 "EHLO mail-pj1-f65.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725942AbgAOFKn (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Jan 2020 00:10:43 -0500 Received: by mail-pj1-f65.google.com with SMTP id n59so7145490pjb.1; Tue, 14 Jan 2020 21:10:42 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=x0sMapq9swaZtL82FLYfnbMqZ10mvQ1x7edYmjwiQss=; b=eBP6mwwAgcu+oMVKVIFyJ0jg/r8ZRafk50xCPKZmxbQNYx6TSiBIyYGjd9PvhbBp5t wP8B2BJtguTYg30y8lqHgDnRu+RhtTQL55JozzxGlgWCkiaukyiOWNRtPQBRZeLPru1/ kuiYMyrpnAIOlQSbL+w/Z5aPc8QvVdfZJnGYxMzZABrFGoLoXpXbg80ACMBiHzmAZZkF OIJI1xRwSUhB7VQleR2g3VA4un8XBPEcT3WJjtKfJGfoFM7J+GVD0aIcQxDAQMYaaynN shv7MLLqMHjft3Czbl7BjVpF9l6i+ZO6l1b9/sMjTWbNZElEMLlPvH2Cr1tHx5rOwzjm bszg== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUPPsd0qbnPfsgXwvq9vDcCICyqzxBfjvpzqlZsCjqmHvU8G2Ig XkWEVQZmpQ2IfxTpgvaESmx3OTSm X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxt1SeWNnk7qTNMgQIZA/pZ1v2rFLXYg0fUidOnZWCwgde1FjHIARePzC+AO0osv/JmHGQ+3g== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:547:: with SMTP id 65mr28728166plf.50.1579065042411; Tue, 14 Jan 2020 21:10:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost ([2601:647:5b00:710:ffa7:88dc:9c39:76d9]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c14sm18791959pjr.24.2020.01.14.21.10.40 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 14 Jan 2020 21:10:41 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2020 21:10:40 -0800 From: Moritz Fischer To: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org Cc: mdf@kernel.org, Will Deacon , mark.rutland@arm.com, linux-fpga@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org, atull@kernel.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, yilun.xu@intel.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/2] add performance reporting support to FPGA DFL drivers Message-ID: <20200115051040.GA1389@epycbox.lan> References: <1573622695-25607-1-git-send-email-hao.wu@intel.com> <20191125033412.GB890@hao-dev> <20191125080127.GC1809@willie-the-truck> <20191125080839.GA6227@hao-dev> <20191209024527.GA22625@hao-dev> <20191216010104.GA32154@yilunxu-OptiPlex-7050> <20200106023742.GA3980@hao-dev> <20200114055605.GA13574@hao-dev> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200114055605.GA13574@hao-dev> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Greg, On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 01:56:05PM +0800, Wu Hao wrote: > On Mon, Jan 06, 2020 at 10:37:42AM +0800, Wu Hao wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 09:01:04AM +0800, Xu Yilum wrote: > > > On Mon, Dec 09, 2019 at 10:45:27AM +0800, Wu Hao wrote: > > > > On Mon, Nov 25, 2019 at 04:08:39PM +0800, Wu Hao wrote: > > > > > On Mon, Nov 25, 2019 at 08:01:28AM +0000, Will Deacon wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, Nov 25, 2019 at 11:34:12AM +0800, Wu Hao wrote: > > > > > > > Hi Will and Mark, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Could you please help us on review this patchset? as this patchset mainly > > > > > > > introduced a new perf driver following the similar way as drivers/perf/*. > > > > > > > > > > > > Why is it not under drivers/perf/, then? > > > > > > > > > > Hi Will > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for the quick response. This is one sub feature for DFL based FPGAs, > > > > > and we plan to put this sub feature together with others, including related > > > > > documentation. It only registers a standard perf pmu for its userspace > > > > > interfaces. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This patchset has been submitted for a long time but didn't receive any > > > > > > > comment after v4. we appreciate any review comments! thanks in advance. :) > > > > > > > > > > > > Hmm, not sure I saw the previous versions. Guessing I wasn't on cc? > > > > > > > > > > We switched to perf API from v4, and started ccing you and Mark from v5. :) > > > > > > > > Hi Will > > > > > > > > Did you get a chance to look into this patchset? > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > Hao > > > > > > Hi Will > > > > > > Did you have time to look into this patchset? We have done review work > > > for FPGA part. And as a perf driver, we appreciate your comments. > > > > > > Thanks > > > Yilun > > > > Hi Will > > > > Did you get a chance to look into this patchset these days? > > > > Actually we didn't receive any comments for a long time, if you are busy and > > don't have enough time on this, do you know if someone else could help with > > review and ack from perf driver point of view, or any other things we can do > > to speed up this? Thanks in advance! > > Hi Moritz > > Looks like still no response from Will. :( > > Do you know someone else could help? Do you have some feedback? I'm a bit confused on what to do in such a situation, do I just take the patch if the maintainer doesn't respond for a while? As always thanks for your help! Cheers, Moritz From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2020 21:10:42 -0800 From: Moritz Fischer Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/2] add performance reporting support to FPGA DFL drivers Message-ID: <20200115051040.GA1389@epycbox.lan> References: <1573622695-25607-1-git-send-email-hao.wu@intel.com> <20191125033412.GB890@hao-dev> <20191125080127.GC1809@willie-the-truck> <20191125080839.GA6227@hao-dev> <20191209024527.GA22625@hao-dev> <20191216010104.GA32154@yilunxu-OptiPlex-7050> <20200106023742.GA3980@hao-dev> <20200114055605.GA13574@hao-dev> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200114055605.GA13574@hao-dev> To: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org Cc: mdf@kernel.org, Will Deacon , mark.rutland@arm.com, linux-fpga@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org, atull@kernel.org, yilun.xu@intel.com List-ID: Hi Greg, On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 01:56:05PM +0800, Wu Hao wrote: > On Mon, Jan 06, 2020 at 10:37:42AM +0800, Wu Hao wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 09:01:04AM +0800, Xu Yilum wrote: > > > On Mon, Dec 09, 2019 at 10:45:27AM +0800, Wu Hao wrote: > > > > On Mon, Nov 25, 2019 at 04:08:39PM +0800, Wu Hao wrote: > > > > > On Mon, Nov 25, 2019 at 08:01:28AM +0000, Will Deacon wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, Nov 25, 2019 at 11:34:12AM +0800, Wu Hao wrote: > > > > > > > Hi Will and Mark, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Could you please help us on review this patchset? as this patchset mainly > > > > > > > introduced a new perf driver following the similar way as drivers/perf/*. > > > > > > > > > > > > Why is it not under drivers/perf/, then? > > > > > > > > > > Hi Will > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for the quick response. This is one sub feature for DFL based FPGAs, > > > > > and we plan to put this sub feature together with others, including related > > > > > documentation. It only registers a standard perf pmu for its userspace > > > > > interfaces. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This patchset has been submitted for a long time but didn't receive any > > > > > > > comment after v4. we appreciate any review comments! thanks in advance. :) > > > > > > > > > > > > Hmm, not sure I saw the previous versions. Guessing I wasn't on cc? > > > > > > > > > > We switched to perf API from v4, and started ccing you and Mark from v5. :) > > > > > > > > Hi Will > > > > > > > > Did you get a chance to look into this patchset? > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > Hao > > > > > > Hi Will > > > > > > Did you have time to look into this patchset? We have done review work > > > for FPGA part. And as a perf driver, we appreciate your comments. > > > > > > Thanks > > > Yilun > > > > Hi Will > > > > Did you get a chance to look into this patchset these days? > > > > Actually we didn't receive any comments for a long time, if you are busy and > > don't have enough time on this, do you know if someone else could help with > > review and ack from perf driver point of view, or any other things we can do > > to speed up this? Thanks in advance! > > Hi Moritz > > Looks like still no response from Will. :( > > Do you know someone else could help? Do you have some feedback? I'm a bit confused on what to do in such a situation, do I just take the patch if the maintainer doesn't respond for a while? As always thanks for your help! Cheers, Moritz From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Moritz Fischer Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/2] add performance reporting support to FPGA DFL drivers Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2020 21:10:40 -0800 Message-ID: <20200115051040.GA1389@epycbox.lan> References: <1573622695-25607-1-git-send-email-hao.wu@intel.com> <20191125033412.GB890@hao-dev> <20191125080127.GC1809@willie-the-truck> <20191125080839.GA6227@hao-dev> <20191209024527.GA22625@hao-dev> <20191216010104.GA32154@yilunxu-OptiPlex-7050> <20200106023742.GA3980@hao-dev> <20200114055605.GA13574@hao-dev> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200114055605.GA13574@hao-dev> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Cc: mdf@kernel.org, Will Deacon , mark.rutland@arm.com, linux-fpga@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org, atull@kernel.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, yilun.xu@intel.com List-Id: linux-api@vger.kernel.org Hi Greg, On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 01:56:05PM +0800, Wu Hao wrote: > On Mon, Jan 06, 2020 at 10:37:42AM +0800, Wu Hao wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 09:01:04AM +0800, Xu Yilum wrote: > > > On Mon, Dec 09, 2019 at 10:45:27AM +0800, Wu Hao wrote: > > > > On Mon, Nov 25, 2019 at 04:08:39PM +0800, Wu Hao wrote: > > > > > On Mon, Nov 25, 2019 at 08:01:28AM +0000, Will Deacon wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, Nov 25, 2019 at 11:34:12AM +0800, Wu Hao wrote: > > > > > > > Hi Will and Mark, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Could you please help us on review this patchset? as this patchset mainly > > > > > > > introduced a new perf driver following the similar way as drivers/perf/*. > > > > > > > > > > > > Why is it not under drivers/perf/, then? > > > > > > > > > > Hi Will > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for the quick response. This is one sub feature for DFL based FPGAs, > > > > > and we plan to put this sub feature together with others, including related > > > > > documentation. It only registers a standard perf pmu for its userspace > > > > > interfaces. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This patchset has been submitted for a long time but didn't receive any > > > > > > > comment after v4. we appreciate any review comments! thanks in advance. :) > > > > > > > > > > > > Hmm, not sure I saw the previous versions. Guessing I wasn't on cc? > > > > > > > > > > We switched to perf API from v4, and started ccing you and Mark from v5. :) > > > > > > > > Hi Will > > > > > > > > Did you get a chance to look into this patchset? > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > Hao > > > > > > Hi Will > > > > > > Did you have time to look into this patchset? We have done review work > > > for FPGA part. And as a perf driver, we appreciate your comments. > > > > > > Thanks > > > Yilun > > > > Hi Will > > > > Did you get a chance to look into this patchset these days? > > > > Actually we didn't receive any comments for a long time, if you are busy and > > don't have enough time on this, do you know if someone else could help with > > review and ack from perf driver point of view, or any other things we can do > > to speed up this? Thanks in advance! > > Hi Moritz > > Looks like still no response from Will. :( > > Do you know someone else could help? Do you have some feedback? I'm a bit confused on what to do in such a situation, do I just take the patch if the maintainer doesn't respond for a while? As always thanks for your help! Cheers, Moritz